Home Brew Forums

Home Brew Forums (http://www.homebrewtalk.com/forum.php)
-   Wine Making Forum (http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f25/)
-   -   LIquid Oak Extract (http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f25/liquid-oak-extract-367651/)

kevinstan 11-14-2012 03:19 AM

LIquid Oak Extract
Worth it or not ? I saw it at my LHBS and now I want it, but wanted to ask first on here. What are the pros and cons ? Anyone used it ?

bigbeergeek 11-14-2012 03:22 AM

Never used it -- what's the point? Why not use chips if you're in a hurry?

kevinstan 11-14-2012 02:07 PM

Extract would be quicker than chips. Right ? Or am I missing something ?

bigbeergeek 11-14-2012 04:09 PM

Chips only take a few days of contact time to do their thing. Add them 4 days before you plan to package the beer and you'll be good to go. Also: you can make your own "extract" by soaking chips in vodka for a couple of weeks and adding the oaked liquor to the beer at packaging. I'd also like to hear the experience from someone who's used extract...

DromJohn 11-14-2012 04:40 PM

Pro: Extracts, whether oak, malt, vanilla, lemon, and so on provide a consistent product and usually maximize the flavors. For instance, liquid smoke passes taste tests by snobbish bbq judges. If you would use vanilla extract rather than scraping the beans, or LME, then oak extract is fine. Some may look down on extract brewing, but it's not like oak chips aren't a step down from aging in an oak barrell.

Cons: Extracts often add alcohol which can change the desired taste. They are less tactile. They usually cost more.

So says Drom John who has oak chips punnishly sitting in Mesquite waiting for an eastbound UPS truck.

saramc 11-14-2012 07:05 PM

Pros: extracts, if homemade, are great for tasting trials as they give you a great idea of what/how much of your extract to add...if you choose to add it.
- if you are fortifying, the alcohol you used as base for your extract simply blends in
-you are only limited by the access to extract ingredients and your imagination.
You will find yourself using them in baking, in cooking, in coffee....even DIY reed infusers.

Cons: it is an extract and some feel that is cheating. My view on that is, if homemade it is all natural ( one would hope you are not using synthetic anything) and it is YOUR craft. If you enter in competition then be sure to disclose if rules require you to do so.

I have not used the LHBS variety of extract because the wines I have tasted that use them have always seemed overdone to me. They may have a better impact in brewing, perhaps not so much in winemaking. BUT, I also believe you get what you pay for. Use only the best extract you can find, and afford. Ask others which extract they prefer for x-flavor and where do they source it. What have they used it in, and in what ratio. A classic example is a chocolate extract: compare LHBS or such to that of StarKayWhite brand chocolate extract. You will never buy another chocolate extract again. That brand is considered by many professionals to be THE brand across the culinary planet. And even normal people can easily attain it, with the click of a mouse.

Tasting trials are key. Do not ever just add x-amount because that is what someone told you. We may share what works for us, but is your wine the exact duplicate, is your extract the exact duplicate? Temperature and S.G. and type/style of wine will impact the outcome of the extract. Be prepared to experiment. You never know when three little drops per gallon will send your palate on a rollercoaster ride. Speaking for all extracts.

Sorry for being a windbag.

Honda88 11-15-2012 01:25 AM

extracts are okay but that is about it, if you are looking for good then the oak needs to be extracted by the wine not added to the wine after being extracted.

WilliamSlayer 11-15-2012 01:23 PM

I've never used liquid oak, but have been advised by a veteran wine maker to reserve it for low quality wines that need 'help'.

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:05 AM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.