 |
|
06-09-2008, 06:29 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lakewood, WA
Posts: 32
|
Do smaller carboys settle faster than big ones?
|
|
I made what was supposed to be a five gallon batch of Raspberry that ended up being six gallons. When i racked it I filled a 5 gallon carboy then a one gallon jug. its been sitting for sevvferal weeks now and has a very dark, rich raspberry color. This evening i tried to shine a light through the large carboy to see how it was clearing and the light didn't even show through. Yet when I shined the light through the one gallon jug it was pretty clear.
Has anyone ever experienced this? Do the smaller carboys clear faster than the big ones. Logic and common sense tell me this is the case but I have found that sometimes experience trumps logic and common sense.
Any thoughts?
__________________
Chris
Lake Grove Cottage Cellars is now
Dragon's Lair Wines and Meads
http://www.dragonslairmeads.com/
**********************************
Planning: Turning the garage into a 100 GPM (gal/month) winery/meadery.
Primary: JM Ancient Orange & Spice Mead, Pure Dragon's Breath Metheglin
Secondary: ZIP
Bulk Storage: Quartermasters Blend
Bottled: Granny Smith Apple, Cheryl's Choice Raspberry, Peacy Keen
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 12:05 PM
|
#2
|
|
Drink your beer!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upper Michigan
Posts: 41,492
|
I don't know- I never really noticed how fast they clear before. One thing I noticed, though, is sometimes the big carboys are clear, but don't seem to be because of the volume. Often, if you pull out a sample, it will be clear in that small container.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 12:31 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 11,900
|
What Yooper said. Unless you have a really "squat" 1-gallon jug, I'd say that you'd be shining light through about twice as much liquid in the 5-gallon carboy...all that extra liquid refracts/absorbs more light, thus making it appear less clear.
__________________
MOSS HOLLOW BREWING CO.
Aristocratic Ales, Lascivious Lagers
.planned:
•Scottish 80/- •Sweet Stout •Roggenbier
.primary | bright:
98: Moss Hollow Soured '09 72: Oude Kriek 99: B-Weisse 102: Brett'd BDSA 104: Feat of Strength Helles Bock 105: Merkin Brown
.on tap | kegged:
XX: Moss Hollow Springs Sparkling Water 95: Gott Mit Uns German Pils 91b: Brown Willie's Oaked Abbey Ale 103: Merkin Stout
98: Yorkshire Special 100: Maple Porter 89: Cidre Saison 101: Steffiweizen '09 (#3)
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 01:26 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Eastern Colorado
Posts: 5,794
|
I actually have a side by side comparison with Leap Year Mead. 100% Same Recipe, same nutrients, same honey, same water, Same Yeast.
The 5 gallon batch is just now clearing...still can't see through a glass of it. The 1 gallon batch has been "Newsprint Clear" for 2 months.
My Gut says YES, Small carboys clear faster, my brain says it's because of the ratio of contact area with the glass. That gives the particulate somewhere to go.
Just a guess....I guess.
__________________
Seriously. I'm here for BEER
It's Not The Size Of Your Rig That Counts....It's How Often You Use It.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TxBrew
This forum is like America's money spread. 90% of the posts were created by 1% of the community.
|
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 03:39 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atkinson (near the Quad Cities), IL
Posts: 17,955
|
I say no. Clearing is a natural occurance.
A squatter container would clear at the same time as a tall skinny one would, but the taller one would "appear" to clear faster as more liquid is observed.
The only difference would be in the surface area.
__________________
HB Bill
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 04:33 AM
|
#6
|
|
Beer Geek
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Decatur, Illinois
Posts: 6,108
|
Ditto to what HB'r 99 said. Like all the others I think its an optical illusion.
The only difference would be if you moved one around more or the content is not the same.
Lets say a 6 gal primary was clearing you pulled off the top for the 1 gal. Then filled the 5 gal. Its possible the 5 gal has more yeast stirred up from racking closer to bottom.
__________________
Success is getting what you want. Happiness is wanting what you get. - Dale Carnegie
BS Nano-Brewery
Primary: Dunkelweizen, Helles, Apfelwein
2ndary:empty
Drinking: Light Ale, Fat Tyre Clone, Portly Porter, Apfelwein
Next: Irish Dry Stout, Caribou Slobber,
|Myeast 50327|Easy Hop Oast|
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 03:04 AM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lakewood, WA
Posts: 32
|
The physics of wine making
|
|
I want to thank you all for your comments. Some thought out and considered, some merely opinion. All are appreciated.
So I have been thinking about this a lot. Probably too much. Does that mean I'm obsessed? I was wondering what Galileo would think about this question.
Here's my conclusion. The smaller carboy appears to clear faster for several reasons. The container is smaller so there has less liquid to look through, therefore less sediment. For example both containers could have, say 1000 ppm of particulate suspended at a given point yet in the larger carboy there is greater volume of liquid and therefore more total particulate at said point.
Next I considered total sediment within each container and concluded that the smaller carboy has less sediment by volume so of course it would appear to clear faster. I also considered the distance the sediment has to fall to reach the bottom. Again, the sediment in the smaller carboy has less distance to fall and will therefor appear to clear faster. This does not conflict with Galileo's theory on falling objects.
In the final analysis I have formed the following two hypothesis: 1) The smaller the container the faster it will clear and 2) There is no gravity, the earth sucks.
__________________
Chris
Lake Grove Cottage Cellars is now
Dragon's Lair Wines and Meads
http://www.dragonslairmeads.com/
**********************************
Planning: Turning the garage into a 100 GPM (gal/month) winery/meadery.
Primary: JM Ancient Orange & Spice Mead, Pure Dragon's Breath Metheglin
Secondary: ZIP
Bulk Storage: Quartermasters Blend
Bottled: Granny Smith Apple, Cheryl's Choice Raspberry, Peacy Keen
|
|
|
06-16-2008, 07:04 PM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Washington D.C. Metro area
Posts: 512
|
The answer as has been posted above is the smaller amounts of suspended sediment so the smaller clears more quickly than the larger.
Another factor is that it's probable that more sediment will be sucked from the bottom of the primary fermenter than from the top as our yeasties tend to sink over time.
If one filled the small container from near the bottom of the primary there may be more sediment per unit volume (per cubic centimeter), but less sediment in total than in the larger carboy.
|
|
|
06-16-2008, 07:36 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Eastern Colorado
Posts: 5,794
|
Pythagorean what? Angle is proportionate to who?
You guys can complicate the simplest of questions!
I hope nobody asks a "Technical" Question. 
__________________
Seriously. I'm here for BEER
It's Not The Size Of Your Rig That Counts....It's How Often You Use It.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TxBrew
This forum is like America's money spread. 90% of the posts were created by 1% of the community.
|
|
|
|
06-16-2008, 07:53 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atkinson (near the Quad Cities), IL
Posts: 17,955
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigKahuna
Pythagorean what? Angle is proportionate to who?
You guys can complicate the simplest of questions!
I hope nobody asks a "Technical" Question. 
|
So, to paraphrase...when clear...rack... 
__________________
HB Bill
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|