The Great Bottle Opener Giveaway

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Community > General Chit Chat > New Zealand wants to tax methane emmissons

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-23-2008, 12:58 PM   #1
EdWort
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
EdWort's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bee Cave, Texas
Posts: 11,968
Liked 251 Times on 135 Posts
Likes Given: 7

Default New Zealand wants to tax methane emmissons

How long before they go after homebrewers and their yeast byproducts? Customers of Taco Bell?

http://www.chicagotribune.com/featur...,7812753.story

EdWort is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-23-2008, 01:52 PM   #2
Evan!
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Evan!'s Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 11,901
Liked 66 Times on 60 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

CO2 production from brewers' yeast and Chicken Soft Taco Anal Explosions is a drop in the ocean compared to livestock emissions, so I doubt you'll see anyone going after brewers or the unfortunate Taco Hell patrons any time soon.

But really, if it's an externalized effect, which livestock methane emissions certainly are, I can see how an argument could be made for some kind of regulation or agreement on how to deal with said externalities.

__________________
MOSS HOLLOW BREWING CO.
Aristocratic Ales, Lascivious Lagers


.planned:
•Scottish 80/- •Sweet Stout •Roggenbier
.primary | bright:
98: Moss Hollow Soured '09 72: Oude Kriek 99: B-Weisse 102: Brett'd BDSA 104: Feat of Strength Helles Bock 105: Merkin Brown
.on tap | kegged:
XX: Moss Hollow Springs Sparkling Water 95: Gott Mit Uns German Pils 91b: Brown Willie's Oaked Abbey Ale 103: Merkin Stout
98: Yorkshire Special 100: Maple Porter 89: Cidre Saison 101: Steffiweizen '09 (#3)
Evan! is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-23-2008, 02:20 PM   #3
Loweface
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Limerick, Ireland
Posts: 1,041
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts

Default

Brewing is relativly carbon neutral anyway... The CO2 produced by the yeast is coming from sugars (derived from starch derived from sugars) derived from the sun through photosynthesis...

As such the only real CO2 comes from the electricity used to boil the wort, keep it warm etc... And the petrol/diesel used to cultivate and deliver the raw grain etc...

What I mean to say is that it has no more impact on the environment (in CO2 terms) than say, cooking...

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Me
In the process of buying a bar... One drink at a time...
Quote:
Originally Posted by chortly View Post
...homebrew contains more satisfactrons per serving, so you don't have to drink as much as you would a commercial beer to get to your satisfactron saturation.
Loweface is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-23-2008, 02:39 PM   #4
EdWort
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
EdWort's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bee Cave, Texas
Posts: 11,968
Liked 251 Times on 135 Posts
Likes Given: 7

Default

What about livestock emissions 100 years ago? To me it's ridiculous and just a way to tax the poor cattlemen and drive up the price of food.

Animals of all kind have been farting and belching long before we came around. It's unproven that reducing it (if they can) will ever change anything in the first place, but it makes people feel good and lines the pockets of governments.

I wonder if these ladies should buy some carbon credits.

EdWort is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-23-2008, 03:02 PM   #5
Evan!
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Evan!'s Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 11,901
Liked 66 Times on 60 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdWort View Post
What about livestock emissions 100 years ago? To me it's ridiculous and just a way to tax the poor cattlemen and drive up the price of food.

Animals of all kind have been farting and belching long before we came around. It's unproven that reducing it (if they can) will ever change anything in the first place, but it makes people feel good and lines the pockets of governments.
I'm a staunch libertarian, Ed, and so I'm loathe to give the gubmint any more power than it already has...but even I have to admit that IF it's an externality, there should be some way for those affected by it to mitigate it.

Can they reduce it? Will it help anything? I don't know for sure. But that doesn't preclude the general idea of trying to mitigate or compensate for externalities such as this. Principally speaking, what happened 100 years ago is not a valid argument against doing something about it now. And in terms of the principles involved (namely, externalized effects of agriculture), that fact that current models might "tax poor cattlemen and line the pockets of the government" are not valid arguments either. You can fix those problems and still make an argument that externalized effects should be controlled...just as you would expect some sort of controls to prohibit your upstream neighbor from dumping chemicals into the river and polluting your water supply. The details you mention can be fixed and the idea of regulating externalized effects is still valid. The problems you list are really just problems with the execution of the idea, not the idea itself.
__________________
MOSS HOLLOW BREWING CO.
Aristocratic Ales, Lascivious Lagers


.planned:
•Scottish 80/- •Sweet Stout •Roggenbier
.primary | bright:
98: Moss Hollow Soured '09 72: Oude Kriek 99: B-Weisse 102: Brett'd BDSA 104: Feat of Strength Helles Bock 105: Merkin Brown
.on tap | kegged:
XX: Moss Hollow Springs Sparkling Water 95: Gott Mit Uns German Pils 91b: Brown Willie's Oaked Abbey Ale 103: Merkin Stout
98: Yorkshire Special 100: Maple Porter 89: Cidre Saison 101: Steffiweizen '09 (#3)
Evan! is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-23-2008, 03:30 PM   #6
EdWort
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
EdWort's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bee Cave, Texas
Posts: 11,968
Liked 251 Times on 135 Posts
Likes Given: 7

Default

If ways to reduce it without arbitrarily digging into my wallet are available, then by all means let's do it. To levy a tax in hopes of changing behavior in hopes of making a change in hopes of making a difference leaves too much hope on the table and not enough fact & reality.

__________________

Cheers,

EdWort

Haus Pale Ale, Bavarian Hefeweizen, Robust Porter, Oktoberfest Ale, Wounded Knee IPA, Rye IPA, BCB IPA, Kolsch, Apfelwein

EdWort is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-23-2008, 04:14 PM   #7
Loweface
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Limerick, Ireland
Posts: 1,041
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts

Default

The real approach to take is to try reducing "food miles"... New Zealand beef may be great (it is and I've eaten plenty of it), but the distance it travels to get to the US or Europe is crazy when it can be produced locally. Irish people should eat Irish beef, Americans should eat US beef, Kiwis should eat New Zealand beef (I'm sure they do).

If a country can't produce a product, they should import from their closest neighbours.

This isn't a rant about self sufficiency’s nor is it meant to be against any countries exports or rights to export but something is wrong when your dinner has travelled longer in it's short lifespan than you have in a much longer one...

/Rant

Disclaimer: I am very guilty of buying long distanec because it's cheaper but then hey, I'm still a student...

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Me
In the process of buying a bar... One drink at a time...
Quote:
Originally Posted by chortly View Post
...homebrew contains more satisfactrons per serving, so you don't have to drink as much as you would a commercial beer to get to your satisfactron saturation.

Last edited by Loweface; 06-23-2008 at 04:14 PM. Reason: spelling
Loweface is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-23-2008, 04:23 PM   #8
Evan!
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Evan!'s Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 11,901
Liked 66 Times on 60 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdWort View Post
If ways to reduce it without arbitrarily digging into my wallet are available, then by all means let's do it. To levy a tax in hopes of changing behavior in hopes of making a change in hopes of making a difference leaves too much hope on the table and not enough fact & reality.
Agree 100%. I support the spirit of the regs, but, judging by how effective the gubmint is at most things besides blowing sh*t up, I have very little faith in its ability to execute it properly.
__________________
MOSS HOLLOW BREWING CO.
Aristocratic Ales, Lascivious Lagers


.planned:
•Scottish 80/- •Sweet Stout •Roggenbier
.primary | bright:
98: Moss Hollow Soured '09 72: Oude Kriek 99: B-Weisse 102: Brett'd BDSA 104: Feat of Strength Helles Bock 105: Merkin Brown
.on tap | kegged:
XX: Moss Hollow Springs Sparkling Water 95: Gott Mit Uns German Pils 91b: Brown Willie's Oaked Abbey Ale 103: Merkin Stout
98: Yorkshire Special 100: Maple Porter 89: Cidre Saison 101: Steffiweizen '09 (#3)
Evan! is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
hi from new zealand fishoe Introductions 5 06-28-2009 02:49 PM
How about using spent grains to generate methane to run the kettle? Poindexter Equipment/Sanitation 7 06-08-2009 02:33 PM
hello from new zealand martinworswick Introductions 11 05-19-2009 11:38 PM
hello from new zealand jchobs Introductions 6 05-05-2009 11:41 AM
Hi from New Zealand Styles Introductions 2 04-20-2009 09:37 PM