The Great Bottle Opener Giveaway

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Community > General Chit Chat > Casey Anthony - not guilty

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-05-2011, 06:46 PM   #1
mrduna01
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Louisville, KY, KY
Posts: 870
Liked 24 Times on 22 Posts

Default Casey Anthony - not guilty

What are your thoughts on this? Can't say I'm surprised.

__________________
mrduna01 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-05-2011, 06:51 PM   #2
cd38
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas,Texas
Posts: 218
Liked 3 Times on 2 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

Pissed is all I can say

__________________
cd38 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-05-2011, 06:52 PM   #3
mlyday
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 915
Liked 25 Times on 24 Posts

Default

Nope. Although most people agree she is probably guilty, the prosocution has to prove it BEYOND a reasonable doubt. There case mostly circumstantial. Obviously not enough for those 12 people.

mlyday is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-05-2011, 06:56 PM   #4
Airborneguy
Adjunct of the Law
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Airborneguy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Isle of Staten
Posts: 10,854
Liked 835 Times on 619 Posts
Likes Given: 1103

Default

Sucks but sometimes you just can't prove it to the level our nation requires. She's definitely guilty, but not beyond a reasonable doubt. Hopefully she fixes herself so she can't kill anymore kids (well her own at least).

__________________
Fermentor(s):
Lagering:
Bottled: Atonement Brown Porter
Airborneguy is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-05-2011, 06:56 PM   #5
mrduna01
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Louisville, KY, KY
Posts: 870
Liked 24 Times on 22 Posts

Default

I am pisses myself but I think the jury acted as they were supposed to, all emotion aside. There were so many lies from so many people that the jury couldn't possibly make heads or tails out of what really happened. Even so she obviously had some part in it but how much was her part? I think the jury just didn't know and the justice system in this country kind of goes the way of not guilty when there is that much doubt. There is certainly no justice for kaylee here.

__________________
mrduna01 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-05-2011, 06:59 PM   #6
beerloaf
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 610
Liked 15 Times on 15 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlyday View Post
Nope. Although most people agree she is probably guilty, the prosocution has to prove it BEYOND a reasonable doubt. There case mostly circumstantial. Obviously not enough for those 12 people.
Exactly! I personally think that she is a POS however if she murdered that child, it cannot be proven. The problem arose when the coroner could not even establish an actual cause of death. Everything in this case is speculation which sucks because that little girl will not get any justice.

beerloaf
__________________
"Look, let me explain something to you. I'm not Mr. Lebowski. You're Mr. Lebowski. I'm the Dude. So that's what you call me. That or His Dudeness... Duder... or El Duderino, if, you know, you're not into the whole brevity thing." -The Dude
beerloaf is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-05-2011, 07:05 PM   #7
LVBen
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,345
Liked 18 Times on 18 Posts
Likes Given: 52

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Airborneguy View Post
She's definitely guilty, but not beyond a reasonable doubt.
I think my definition of 'definitely' is different from yours!
__________________
LVBen is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-05-2011, 07:08 PM   #8
mrduna01
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Louisville, KY, KY
Posts: 870
Liked 24 Times on 22 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beerloaf

Exactly! I personally think that she is a POS however if she murdered that child, it cannot be proven. The problem arose when the coroner could not even establish an actual cause of death. Everything in this case is speculation which sucks because that little girl will not get any justice.

beerloaf
My thoughts exactly. I thought the defense did a tremendous job throwing doubt in every single piece of evidence. Understand though I'm not condoning letting a child killer free. Interesting how the parents walked out moments later. I wonder when the Casey Anthony book will come out.
__________________
mrduna01 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-05-2011, 07:08 PM   #9
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Thiensville, Wisconsin
Posts: 6,597
Liked 207 Times on 182 Posts
Likes Given: 366

Default

Hi, my name is Jose Baez, and today I just put a child killer back on the street. Who wants to buy me a coke?

__________________
Quote:
The man who intoxicates himself on bad whisky is sometimes moved to kill his wife and set his house on fire, but the victim of applejack is capable of blowing up a whole town with dynamite and of reciting original poetry to every surviving inhabitant.

– "A Wicked Beverage," New York Times, April 10, 1894
motobrewer is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-05-2011, 07:08 PM   #10
cd38
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas,Texas
Posts: 218
Liked 3 Times on 2 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

Yea sucks that a 2 year old could have this done to her and no one has to pay for it!!!! Freaking animals

__________________
cd38 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools