 |
|
11-29-2010, 03:46 PM
|
#21
|
|
Moderator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Reed City, MI
Posts: 18,785
Liked 747 Times on 564 Posts Likes Given: 347
|
Passed here in May. I hear the bars are losing patronage, and as a side benefit, the school system, which is partially funded with lottery sales, are losing money because people are spending fewer dollars at the bar, which jmeans fewer lottery tickets too.
But, I went to a Karaoke bar this summer and in no time the place was a friggin smokestack. I guess the law doesn't count if nobody calls the cops. FYI - The ventilation system was non-existent and we came home smelling like a pack of camels.
I am personally for a smoke-free bar and the right to smoke in a bar if you want to.
|
|
|
11-29-2010, 04:19 PM
|
#22
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Mid Missouri, MO
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZ_IPA
Is this the first 5.5 year thread bump in the history of HBT?
|
This is a pretty impressive necro 
__________________
The standard by which all women should be judged: those who like Monty Python and those who don't.
|
|
|
11-30-2010, 05:25 PM
|
#24
|
|
Beer Drinker
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: North Augusta, SC
Posts: 2,897
Liked 81 Times on 64 Posts Likes Given: 47
|
Not sure if the "bars will lose business" argument holds water -
22% of Americans smoke - that means 78% do not. And some percentage of THAT population doesn't frequent bars because of the smoke. So they're likely to GAIN some patrons...maybe as many as they lose or more.
my 2 cents.
and yes, nice zombie resurrection, dzlater, intentional or not!
|
|
|
11-30-2010, 05:49 PM
|
#25
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,657
Liked 15 Times on 15 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
The majority of San Antonio will be smoke free in August, 2011.
The delay is to give business owners time to build patios for smoking outside. Seems like a very reasonable compromise.
__________________
Doggfather Brewery
Planned: Lambic, American IPA
Fermenting: 6 gals of 1.090 stout (Belgian) & 6 gals of 1.090 stout (English)
Tapped: Berliner Weisse, Black English IPA, German Pils, & Live Oak Primus
|
|
|
11-30-2010, 06:12 PM
|
#26
|
|
Adjunct of the Law
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Isle of Staten
Posts: 10,346
Liked 658 Times on 499 Posts Likes Given: 853
|
In NYC, the bar business dipped initially, but went right back up. Smokers rebelled, but once the appeal of the bar outweighs staying home to smoke, they returned.
Overall it is a smashing success and I don't recall anyone I know complaining about it.
__________________
Fermentor(s):
Lagering:
Kegged: Unintentional Sour Brown
Bottled:
Tapped: Midnight Wheat
Up Next: IPA
Reading: 100 Battles
|
|
|
11-30-2010, 06:15 PM
|
#27
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,657
Liked 15 Times on 15 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airborneguy
Overall it is a smashing success and I don't recall anyone I know complaining about it.
|
You mean, complaining about it now.
People were screaming bloody murder around here. Houston had a similar backlash that disappeared quickly.
__________________
Doggfather Brewery
Planned: Lambic, American IPA
Fermenting: 6 gals of 1.090 stout (Belgian) & 6 gals of 1.090 stout (English)
Tapped: Berliner Weisse, Black English IPA, German Pils, & Live Oak Primus
|
|
|
11-30-2010, 06:49 PM
|
#28
|
|
Adjunct of the Law
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Isle of Staten
Posts: 10,346
Liked 658 Times on 499 Posts Likes Given: 853
|
True, there was a lot of complaining when it started. Even most smokers agree with it now though.
__________________
Fermentor(s):
Lagering:
Kegged: Unintentional Sour Brown
Bottled:
Tapped: Midnight Wheat
Up Next: IPA
Reading: 100 Battles
|
|
|
12-01-2010, 10:42 AM
|
#29
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 982
Liked 55 Times on 38 Posts Likes Given: 6
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hang Glider
Not sure if the "bars will lose business" argument holds water -
22% of Americans smoke - that means 78% do not. And some percentage of THAT population doesn't frequent bars because of the smoke. So they're likely to GAIN some patrons...maybe as many as they lose or more.
my 2 cents.
and yes, nice zombie resurrection, dzlater, intentional or not!
|
Shortly after it passed here, there was an article in the paper talking about the loss to businesses. They claimed that it was because the smokers were spending far less time at the bar when they went there. Instead of staying for a couple of hours or more, they would stay for a half hour or so, and leave. There were more reasons, but that was the one that I remembered the most.
__________________
Does that make me an ***hole?
No, that's not what makes you an ***hole.
|
|
|
12-01-2010, 02:56 PM
|
#30
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 141
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
In Michigan, smoking is banned in bars as well. On one hand, it's nice going out to the bars and not smelling like smoke. But on the other hand, I'm a believer in fewer government regulations and think it should be up to the bars to make the decision. When smoking was allowed I did tend to frequent smoke-free watering holes more so than ones that did allow smoking.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|