 |
|
12-05-2012, 06:28 AM
|
#91
|
|
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: McLean/Ogden, Virginia/Quebec
Posts: 3,805
Liked 204 Times on 173 Posts Likes Given: 7
|
Except that here the bible is based on sound engineering principles and decades of experience in fire prevention and safety enhancing techniques. Unlike the bible the code can be updated as the needs of the industry change and as new risks and technologies are discovered.
Also I must say I haven't seen any personal attacks (well maybe a couple of small ones). Apparently some consider questioning of their positions as personal attacks but picking up your marbles and stomping off the playground isn't a very mature attitude and is not one conducive to development of deeper understanding.
Someone complained that the code makes unreasonable demands on us when we build our own equipment. The code does not expect you to build your own equipment. It expects us to buy 'listed' equipment or equipment which has UL or other certifying laboratory seal of approval. Knowing that "The purpose of this Code is the practical safeguarding of persons and property from hazards arising from the use of electricity." I want any equipment I build to be as compliant with it as possible because there are reasons for all the provisions. This does put a heavy burden on me because the damn thing isn't exactly light reading. Grounding is a particularly difficult area because the reasons for the grounding rules aren't always obvious. As a consequence I've had professional electricians miswire panels in my house and I have also stumbled onto professional electricians' bulletin boards where essentially this same subject is debated with equal heat (and real personal attacks). Interesting.
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 06:40 AM
|
#92
|
|
Drinks Beer
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Surrounded by Yoopers
Posts: 3,165
Liked 308 Times on 230 Posts Likes Given: 136
|
AJ, you've wrapped this up. I vote for sticky. Or submit your article for membership. You seem to have technical writing mastered.
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 07:22 AM
|
#93
|
|
Registered User
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 821
Liked 38 Times on 35 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajdelange
Except that here the bible is based on sound engineering principles and decades of experience in fire prevention and safety enhancing techniques. Unlike the bible the code can be updated as the needs of the industry change and as new risks and technologies are discovered.
Also I must say I haven't seen any personal attacks (well maybe a couple of small ones). Apparently some consider questioning of their positions as personal attacks but picking up your marbles and stomping off the playground isn't a very mature attitude and is not one conducive to development of deeper understanding.
Someone complained that the code makes unreasonable demands on us when we build our own equipment. The code does not expect you to build your own equipment. It expects us to buy 'listed' equipment or equipment which has UL or other certifying laboratory seal of approval. Knowing that "The purpose of this Code is the practical safeguarding of persons and property from hazards arising from the use of electricity." I want any equipment I build to be as compliant with it as possible because there are reasons for all the provisions. This does put a heavy burden on me because the damn thing isn't exactly light reading. Grounding is a particularly difficult area because the reasons for the grounding rules aren't always obvious. As a consequence I've had professional electricians miswire panels in my house and I have also stumbled onto professional electricians' bulletin boards where essentially this same subject is debated with equal heat (and real personal attacks). Interesting.
|
I mostly agree with you - I was a practicing electrician for many years. I've seen my share of electrician screw-ups like floating grounds and reverse wiring (hot on white, neutral on black). But NEC does not expect you to buy any plug-in device to any code because the NEC covers wiring. The sentince you quoted "The purpose of this Code is the practical safeguarding of persons and property from hazards arising from the use of electricity." includes that 1930's antique electric fan you may have bought off eBay, or one of the 1920's - 1940's vacuum tube radio I restore, all of which use non-polarized plugs and have exposed metal parts, and all of which carry no modern UL certification.
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 12:11 PM
|
#94
|
|
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 254
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts
|
Say the spa panel is mounted on the brew stand and connected to a pre-1996 50a range outlet (H-H-N). Is it possible/safe/legal to drive another grounding rod to connect the spa panel earth ground. You wouldn't be connecting the neutral and grounding wires at any point and you'd have a true 4 wire system for the spa panel.
It was mentioned earlier in the thread, but I don't remember reading a response to the idea.
__________________
-Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 12:26 PM
|
#95
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,031
Liked 75 Times on 55 Posts Likes Given: 12
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsguitar
I don't see how the NEC could possibly expect everyone to buy and read the NEC code book before they plug something in. It's just unrealistic and too far reaching IMO.
|
The NEC doesn't expect people, generally speaking, to buy and read the NEC code book. However, most people aren't wiring up spa panels and fabricating electric brew systems, et al. The average consumer is plugging in a lamp, or a TV, or a welder that they purchased as a complete, tested, and approved unit.
General consumer safety relies on engineers and manufacturers to adhere to sound practices guided by NEC and perhaps UL, and such devices passing the appropriate certification and approval criteria, so the average Joe doesn't have to be a Code expert. What's going on here is a completely different matter.
DEIT: Sorry...more or less a duplicate of AJ's post...
__________________
Primary: Empty
Bottled: Maibock
Bottled: Edwort's Apfelwein
Drinking: Irish Dry Stout
"Charlie don't surf."
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 12:44 PM
|
#96
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,031
Liked 75 Times on 55 Posts Likes Given: 12
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thargrav
But NEC does not expect you to buy any plug-in device to any code because the NEC covers wiring. The sentince you quoted "The purpose of this Code is the practical safeguarding of persons and property from hazards arising from the use of electricity." includes that 1930's antique electric fan you may have bought off eBay, or one of the 1920's - 1940's vacuum tube radio I restore, all of which use non-polarized plugs and have exposed metal parts, and all of which carry no modern UL certification.
|
What's your point here...that we should continue to foster 1920's ways, despite the knowledge and insight gained in roughly the last 90 years?
You're right in the semantics sense that NEC doesn't expect you to buy any device to any given code, but that's not license to intentionally or unintentionally violate NEC when it has articles that specifically apply to cord and plug connected equipment. 250.114 is very clear in this statement and is pretty much proof positive that NEC doesn't stop at the receptacle or hard-wired installations.
__________________
Primary: Empty
Bottled: Maibock
Bottled: Edwort's Apfelwein
Drinking: Irish Dry Stout
"Charlie don't surf."
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 01:08 PM
|
#97
|
|
Registered User
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 821
Liked 38 Times on 35 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whoaru99
What's your point here...that we should continue to foster 1920's ways, despite the knowledge and insight gained in roughly the last 90 years?
You're right in the semantics sense that NEC doesn't expect you to buy any device to any given code, but that's not license to intentionally or unintentionally violate NEC when it has articles that specifically apply to cord and plug connected equipment. 250.114 is very clear in this statement and is pretty much proof positive that NEC doesn't stop at the receptacle or hard-wired installations.
|
No, my real point is we need to stop nit-picking eack other's opinions.
If you understand electrical wiring and want to use the SPA panel then go ahead and wire it yourself. But if you are unsure you should hire an electrician.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beer_Maker
Say the spa panel is mounted on the brew stand and connected to a pre-1996 50a range outlet (H-H-N). Is it possible/safe/legal to drive another grounding rod to connect the spa panel earth ground. You wouldn't be connecting the neutral and grounding wires at any point and you'd have a true 4 wire system for the spa panel.
It was mentioned earlier in the thread, but I don't remember reading a response to the idea.
|
Yes you can legally and safely run a separate ground wire to the SPA panel, and if you do, the new ground has to be completely isolated from the neutral wire coming in. But you need to look at your local code requirements for sub-panel grounding.
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 01:22 PM
|
#98
|
|
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 254
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts
|
Is it still considered a sub-panel if its a plug in device?
__________________
-Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 01:31 PM
|
#99
|
|
Registered User
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 821
Liked 38 Times on 35 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beer_Maker
Is it still considered a sub-panel if its a plug in device?
|
It is not a sub-panel of it's plugged in.
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 01:38 PM
|
#100
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,756
Liked 142 Times on 118 Posts Likes Given: 188
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thargrav
...
Yes you can legally and safely run a separate ground wire to the SPA panel, and if you do, the new ground has to be completely isolated from the neutral wire coming in. But you need to look at your local code requirements for sub-panel grounding.
|
Try this idea: The scene is a farm with a barn on the property. The electric power is set up and delivered to the house. Power to the barn is run on overhead wires delivering 120/240V. In every case, the power is delivered as a 3 wire system and ground at the barn is established at that service panel using a grounding rod.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|