 |
|
05-10-2011, 05:51 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: firestone, co
Posts: 344
Liked 11 Times on 8 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
K type thermocouple or RTD sensor
|
|
Just about to place the order for the PID and was wondering if anyone uses the K Type thermocouples. Do you find them to be not that accurate? Its hard to drop $65 for 2 RTDs when K type go for less then $10 on ebay.
|
|
|
05-10-2011, 07:23 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 5,420
Liked 48 Times on 46 Posts Likes Given: 29
|
RTD !
I've used both and find RTD's to be more accurate. I also like to stick with the same source for both devices. I've found that the calibration is usually pretty close as delivered, whereas when I've bought other brands I have to work at it.
|
|
|
05-10-2011, 08:27 PM
|
#3
|
|
I use secondaries. :p
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 11,238
Liked 64 Times on 56 Posts Likes Given: 11
|
__________________
Ground Fault Brewing Co.
|
|
|
05-10-2011, 09:07 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: firestone, co
Posts: 344
Liked 11 Times on 8 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
THANKS! Dont know how I missed those searching this morning. Now if they could only shorten that probe up a little. I think I can make it work.
|
|
|
05-10-2011, 09:51 PM
|
#5
|
|
I use secondaries. :p
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 11,238
Liked 64 Times on 56 Posts Likes Given: 11
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by acefaser
THANKS! Dont know how I missed those searching this morning.
|
Probably because they mistakenly labeled them as "thermocouples" and don't mentioned "RTD" in the listing.
I actually searched for "pt100", which is a common type of RTD, and that's what showed up.
__________________
Ground Fault Brewing Co.
|
|
|
05-11-2011, 06:58 AM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: portland
Posts: 628
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Thermocouples can be very accurate. We use them in the lab all the time, in fact i can't think of a temp probe that isn't a thermocouple that we use on a daily basis.
I think that in our context here (homebrewing) the problem is that many of us need to extend the leads on our temperature sensors or put them through a wall of some sort (control panel side, etc) using a disconnect. In these cases you have other issues to contend with such as matching wires and proper connectors with thermocouples. These aren't problems for RTD sensors.
As Walker said, though, you can get RTD's for about the same price point as thermocouples. You sacrifice some temperature range going with RTD's, but again in this context they really have no significant limitations and a host of benefits.
__________________
The power to tax, once conceded, has no limits; it contains until it destroys. I was not joking when I told them to dig into their own pouches. It may not be possible to do away with government — sometimes I think that government is an inescapable disease of human beings. But it may be possible to keep it small and starved and inoffensive — and can you think of a better way than by requiring the governors themselves to pay the costs of their antisocial hobby?
R. A. Heinlein
|
|
|
05-11-2011, 02:48 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 5,420
Liked 48 Times on 46 Posts Likes Given: 29
|
excerpted from here
Selecting sensors for reliability
For temperatures ranging from cryogenic to about 800°F (427°C), a resistance temperature detector (RTD) is better than a thermocouple. Though RTDs were once more expensive, today the cost difference between the two is negligible, and an RTD provides greater accuracy, stability, and life span. Over its useable range, a standard-grade RTD provides more than twice the accuracy of a thermocouple.
To understand why, consider the materials of construction. A thermocouple is comprised of two dissimilar metals welded together; the resulting junction begins to deteriorate immediately. The deterioration is faster at higher temperatures and can result in drift of several degrees per year. On the other hand, an RTD consists of stable, highly purified platinum.
RTDs drift just fractions of a degree per year and are accurate for many years when used at temperatures below 800°F (427°C). Thermocouples, however, are not and require frequent replacement. This tips the scale for installation costs in favor of the RTD.
|
|
|
05-11-2011, 03:10 PM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 798
Liked 62 Times on 50 Posts Likes Given: 38
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by samc
excerpted from here
Selecting sensors for reliability
For temperatures ranging from cryogenic to about 800°F (427°C), a resistance temperature detector (RTD) is better than a thermocouple. Though RTDs were once more expensive, today the cost difference between the two is negligible, and an RTD provides greater accuracy, stability, and life span. Over its useable range, a standard-grade RTD provides more than twice the accuracy of a thermocouple.
To understand why, consider the materials of construction. A thermocouple is comprised of two dissimilar metals welded together; the resulting junction begins to deteriorate immediately. The deterioration is faster at higher temperatures and can result in drift of several degrees per year. On the other hand, an RTD consists of stable, highly purified platinum.
RTDs drift just fractions of a degree per year and are accurate for many years when used at temperatures below 800°F (427°C). Thermocouples, however, are not and require frequent replacement. This tips the scale for installation costs in favor of the RTD.
|
Well, I can agree with this in theory but I can also tell you in practice, in any lab setting I have ever been in and I have been in allot, thermocouples can last a very long time and because they have a very predictable response curve they are very easy to calibrate initially and when they do drift out of cal over time.
That being said, trigger is right about the potential issues we may see in homebrewing and if the RTD will work better for your setup then you should certainly go that rout!
|
|
|
05-11-2011, 08:15 PM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: firestone, co
Posts: 344
Liked 11 Times on 8 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
I think I am going with the RTDs for the following reasons:
1. I'm anal and strive for perfection and the RTDs are more accurate.
2. The Auber Instrument RTDs have the nice quick disconnect to remove the wire. (even though they are charging me $18 to ship something that would easily fit in a $10 USPS box).
I plan on using 1 PID and having the quick disconnect I could swap the wires from the HLT RTD to the RTD on the boil pot.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|