 |
|
04-14-2011, 01:32 PM
|
#11
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,756
Liked 142 Times on 118 Posts Likes Given: 188
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhollist
...
Only thing missing on the schematics you posted, P-J is the wiring of the temp probe.
Do you have something like that worked up?
|
Temp probe wiring is really covered in the PID manual. With that said:

Setup for a RTD probe.

Setup for a type K probe.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhollist
I took some liberties with your diagram P/J in irfanview. Keep in mind that I am know very little about electrical, but I feel I know enough to merely delete stuff!
Would this be an acceptable set-up for a PID controlled BIAB setup?
|
That's fine. I see no problem in doing it that way.
|
|
|
04-14-2011, 01:53 PM
|
#12
|
|
Comfortably Numb
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rabbit Town, Bama
Posts: 1,252
Liked 59 Times on 53 Posts Likes Given: 15
|
What is the difference between the 2352 and the 2362 PIDs and which one is better? I am doing a 240V HLT and have 45A SSrs. Thanks
|
|
|
04-14-2011, 02:14 PM
|
#13
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,756
Liked 142 Times on 118 Posts Likes Given: 188
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shelly_belly
What is the difference between the 2352 and the 2362 PIDs and which one is better? I am doing a 240V HLT and have 45A SSrs. Thanks
|
Either one will work. The difference? The SYL-2352 PID uses "fuzzy logic" for its temperature control which provides better accuracy. Take a look at the manuals for each one for a better understanding.
|
|
|
04-14-2011, 03:11 PM
|
#14
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wakefield, RI
Posts: 21
|
Another quick question (and sorry to Hi-jack GRHunter!):
What plugs are best?
I was thinking either NEMA L6-30, NEMA 10-30, or NEMA 14-40 without using the neutral (are any of these unacceptable?) from element to panel and then a standard 4 wire plug (ala The Electric Brewery) from panel (hardwired) to 240v 30am GFCI receptacle.
the NEMA 10-30 and 14-40 are likely the cheapest options. Are they kosher though.....
Last edited by jhollist; 04-14-2011 at 06:37 PM.
Reason: updated plug from element
|
|
|
04-14-2011, 06:46 PM
|
#15
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, De
Posts: 9
|
Thanks for posting guys! I'm looking to do the same thing, a 5500k element, 240v, 30A, single pump, single PID, with dual temp probes (one for BK/HLT, one for MT) which all seems workable from some of PJ's diagrams (thanks, btw! Your work is astounding.) My only alteration is I want a secondary display to continually show the temp in the MT. I'll be using my old IC as the HERM coil, submerged in the BK/HLT, which will be controlled by the PID. In my head it's a simple on/of, PID display, secondary display, button for the element, button for the pump, big ol' E-stop button. Simple, sleek, small. Any suggestions?
Edit:
I've been looking at that diagram you linked to, P-J, for a while now. What I can figure for the element is simply eliminate the dual switch for the element in favor of a single switch, and cut out one of the pumps. That would take care of everything except the secondary display and the e-stop. What would you do to rig those into the existing diagrams?
Last edited by Mindar76; 04-14-2011 at 06:51 PM.
|
|
|
04-15-2011, 02:09 AM
|
#16
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,756
Liked 142 Times on 118 Posts Likes Given: 188
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindar76
I'm looking to do a 5500k element, 240v, 30A, single pump, single PID, with dual temp probes (one for BK/HLT, one for MT)
My only alteration is I want a secondary display to continually show the temp in the MT. I'll be using my old IC as the HERM coil, submerged in the BK/HLT, which will be controlled by the PID. In my head it's a simple on/of, PID display, secondary display, button for the element, button for the pump, big ol' E-stop button. Simple, sleek, small. Any suggestions?
I've been looking at that diagram you linked to, P-J, for a while now. What I can figure for the element is simply eliminate the dual switch for the element in favor of a single switch, and cut out one of the pumps. That would take care of everything except the secondary display and the e-stop.
|
Is this what you are looking for?
Auberin-wiring1-a4-5500w-30d.jpg
BTW: That will all fit in the Auber Instruments Project Box. Place the SYL- 1512 under the cutout for the SYL-2352.
P-J
|
|
|
04-15-2011, 06:03 AM
|
#17
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, De
Posts: 9
|
You, sir. Are amazing.
|
|
|
04-15-2011, 12:30 PM
|
#18
|
|
Beer Herder
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Elizabeth, CO
Posts: 2,100
Liked 28 Times on 25 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-J
The HLT is the place where you would want to control the temperature so it's where the probe would normally go. No need for one in the boil kettle.
|
Though note the temp probe must remain connected to the PID - even when running in manual output mode for the boil.
__________________
Many Bothans died to bring you this information.
|
|
|
04-15-2011, 12:56 PM
|
#19
|
|
Beer Herder
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Elizabeth, CO
Posts: 2,100
Liked 28 Times on 25 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shelly_belly
What is the difference between the 2352 and the 2362 PIDs and which one is better?
|
They have slightly different feature sets. You may want to read through the spec sheets and see which you like more.
2362 supports SSR and relay outputs, has a limit operating mode, and is closer to a "traditional" PID (though it does have a configurable AI).
2352 is SSR only, and has a more sophisticated AI. It also uses an entirely different value for P (not proportional band) so experienced PID users may find it a bit strange.
IMO, the 2352 is probably better for the "auto-tune and forget" crowd who don't want to learn (or mess with) PID operation. Folks more comfortable with PIDs will probably prefer the 2362 which is easier to tweak into a critically damped system (for mash temp control).
__________________
Many Bothans died to bring you this information.
|
|
|
11-27-2012, 12:15 AM
|
#20
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Plainfield, IL
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhollist
I took some liberties with your diagram P/J in irfanview. Keep in mind that I am know very little about electrical, but I feel I know enough to merely delete stuff!
Would this be an acceptable set-up for a PID controlled BIAB setup?

|
jhollist, Do you have a higher resolution copy of this image? This is much closer to the design I am leaning towards; however, I will be using a 120v setup with 2000w element.
Thanks.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|