Spike Brewing 12.5 Conical Fermenter Giveaway - Enter Now!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Electric Brewing > Help with Auber 2352

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-27-2011, 05:37 PM   #1
bendavanza
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oak CLiff, TX
Posts: 2,348
Liked 14 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default Help with Auber 2352

I have been using a RIMS toolbox for a while now, and it seemed it was all working well, within a few degrees of my desired temps. I did the upgrade on the impeller of the pump, and the last few times I used it, I overshot the temps. It would seem to work fine for say 20 minutes but slowly creep up, still activating the element when the RTD's temp was above the desired point.
I needed to clean the tun so I made up a batch of cleanitizer (similar to oxy but no rinse) at 5 gallons and once the temp was near the 150 set point, initiated auto-tune. It went through the sequence and when I checked on it about 45 min. later the temp was 155, with the element still being pulsed every so often.
My Pd value (offset for RTD) is at 7 to get the temp from my calibrated digital thermo at the return tube to match the indicated PV.

I'm no EE or anything, so suggestions and help are much appreciated.
links to my equipment should be in my signature.

My brew tree
My RIMS toolbox

__________________
bendavanza is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-29-2011, 09:43 PM   #2
shortyjacobs
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 2,511
Liked 29 Times on 29 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

So what was your setpoint for the autotune process? Starting it at only 5 deg below SP is kind of shallow...maybe aim for 10 deg offset before you fire it up? Not sure why it's an issue that your PV was at 155 with the element pulsed every so often when you returned 45 minutes later...if your SV was 155 for the AT process, it should have then resumed holding 155 after AT finished, which would require pulsing every once in a while....

Most importantly, after you did your recent AT, have you brewed to see if it overshoots?


Shoot: reread your post. Ignore the stuff above. You want to start AT at a point BELOW the SV of the system. AT works by going into full proportional control, (P only, no I and D of the PID controller), and ramps the system UP to the SV until it hits it. Then the controller watches to see what the over shoot is, and lets the system drop back below the SV. Then it fires again, ramping up to SV and watching for overshoot, then letting it relax. It oscillates around the SV a few times, and uses the ramp and decay rates for the system to determine P, I, and D values. So, to do an AutoTune, if your setpoint is at 150, start the AT when the system is at 140 or less. Run through AT again starting at a PV 10 degrees lower than the current system SV, and report back .

Edit: reason behind this is PIDs are assumed to be making CHANGES to a system, not just maintaining temp. So starting the AT process with PV=SV is useless. You want PV=SV-10 or more to start, so it can do what it thinks it should be doing, ramping the system to a new SV and then maintaining that new SV=PV. (this also gives you a controller well tuned to both hold PV=SV, and ramp PV up to a mashout temp of the {mash SV}+something).

Double edit: For clarity, PV = process value, (current temp of mash). SV = setpoint value, (temp you want the mash to be), AT = autotune....you probably knew this, but wanted to make it clear...I hate when people acronym the sh!t out of everything, but I do it too.
__________________
Itchy Dog Brewery.

(As of 10-24-2011)
Primary - Steppe 112 PA, 2x Monday RyePA
Aging - None :-(
On tap - Big Dog, Apfelwein, Steppe 112 PA

My invisible AG sculpture, with no actual sculpture and a tiny footprint.
My Kegerator goes offroading!
My Coors Home Draft dispenser for boating/beering on the go.
shortyjacobs is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-16-2011, 09:57 AM   #3
bendavanza
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oak CLiff, TX
Posts: 2,348
Liked 14 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

What you said makes sense, I did a second AT and it seemed to work better.
I brewed again with it and this time it seemed to hover around 1 degree over the set point so I am happy.

__________________
My brew tree
My RIMS toolbox
bendavanza is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-16-2011, 07:38 PM   #4
scottland
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 2,117
Liked 134 Times on 104 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

I have a 2352 on my RIMS tube, and found what shortyjacob said to be accurate. The few things that helped me.

A. Do an initial AT with the temp about 10 below SP. The autotune runs longer, and seemed to be more accurate.

B. Do a second AT with the temp 10 below the SP, same as the first. Mine dialed itself in much better the second time around. The AT uses the current PID settings, so it helps to run it more than once.

C. Flow rate is extremely critical to settings. you absolutely have to use the same flow rate during your test run as when you are actually recirculating your mash. I found this to make the biggest difference. If my flow is slower than the flow that I tuned at, I get a lot of oscillation in my temps.

__________________
scottland is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Auber 2352 PIDs terrazza Electric Brewing 5 10-13-2011 10:17 PM
Inaccurate Cycle Time on Auber SYL-2352 PIDs Quaffer Electric Brewing 9 06-04-2011 02:47 AM
Help with Auber 2352 PID Navy_Brewer Electric Brewing 0 04-05-2011 07:38 PM
Auber SYL-2352 PID issue: Temp way off JayInJersey Electric Brewing 10 02-15-2011 11:44 PM
Auber 2352 vs. 2362 paledragon Electric Brewing 0 12-19-2010 01:24 PM