 |
|
11-11-2010, 06:20 PM
|
#31
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 488
Liked 18 Times on 14 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
One more detail. I use Beer Tools Pro to formulate all my recipes, even recipes I get from a reliable source like Jamil and John's book. This tunes the recipe to my equipment. BTP takes care of all calculations and volume temperature compensations so that I can focus on formulating the recipe and making accurate measurements. With good preparations I can hit the mash temp within one degree, and I have exactly 0.5 gallons of liquid left in the MLT at the end of the sparge.
|
|
|
11-11-2010, 06:46 PM
|
#32
|
|
It's about the beer.
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Michigan's Upper Peninsula
Posts: 1,783
Liked 57 Times on 48 Posts Likes Given: 80
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quaffer
One more detail. I use Beer Tools Pro to formulate all my recipes, even recipes I get from a reliable source like Jamil and John's book. This tunes the recipe to my equipment. BTP takes care of all calculations and volume temperature compensations so that I can focus on formulating the recipe and making accurate measurements. With good preparations I can hit the mash temp within one degree, and I have exactly 0.5 gallons of liquid left in the MLT at the end of the sparge.
|
There's a compelling argument for using brewing software. I'm kind of old school still, and do most of my calcs by hand, and don't bother calculating irrelevant but useful data like sparge volumes. Using software like that would streamline my process, reduce variables, and help me dial in on some of my recipes.
I've only calculated efficiency a couple times, once with a trial version of software, and they were not the same. That was before I built the new rig. Perhaps I should make the leap to the 21st century now that I have the new rig and the ability to produce more consistent beers, and buy some software...?
TB
__________________
On tap:
1. Bock 2. Pale Ale 3. Blonde 4. Saison 5.[Nitrogen] Dry Stout
Primary:
1. Pale 2. Pale 3. None 4. None 5. None
Secondary:
1. Lambic x2 2. Brett Ale 3. Thimbleberry Lambic x2
Bottled:
About 56 gallons of beer & 7.5 gallons of mead
Kegged & conditioning:
Porter x2, Saison, Pale Ale, Pilsner x2 (lagering)
My 1/2 BBL electric HERMS build | Homemade hot sauce
|
|
|
11-11-2010, 06:53 PM
|
#33
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9,101
Liked 145 Times on 139 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by utopeya
I suspected I was sparging too fast... I'm still working out how to set my valves up so things go at the proper speed. Maybe I also had some channeling, but I'm not sure. I guess as I get my process down, this issue will work itself out. Anyway, the beer in the fermenter smells really good, so I'm excited about that.
Thanks everyone for the help.
|
That has to be it. My first two beers on my new e-herms hit 80%, exactly where the last 50 batches I did in a cooler ended up at. This last one got away from me and I sparged way to fast, like 4 gallons in 15 minutes.  I have never missed an OG by more than 2 points, this one came up 8 points shy.
Beer is ALL about the process, that's why I was so hesitant to change setups, there will be a learning curve. Damn you, mediocre transitional beers.
|
|
|
11-11-2010, 07:06 PM
|
#34
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 488
Liked 18 Times on 14 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiber_Brew
There's a compelling argument for using brewing software. I'm kind of old school still, and do most of my calcs by hand, and don't bother calculating irrelevant but useful data like sparge volumes. Using software like that would streamline my process, reduce variables, and help me dial in on some of my recipes.
I've only calculated efficiency a couple times, once with a trial version of software, and they were not the same. That was before I built the new rig. Perhaps I should make the leap to the 21st century now that I have the new rig and the ability to produce more consistent beers, and buy some software...?
TB
|
It certainly did the trick for me. Also I tried two programs to calculate efficiency. The results were different and neither matched my hand calculations. I figured that those guys must know something I don't so I picked one and let it do the calcs from then on. It is still enlightening to do the calculations once in a while to keep up with how it works.
I am really happy with Beer Tools Pro. It is inexpensive and it does a great job. It takes a little time to get the hang of, but now it makes perfect sense how it works.
|
|
|
11-11-2010, 07:28 PM
|
#35
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Monroe, CT
Posts: 522
|
I have a corona Mill sitting around and I could grind that into a fine powder on my next wheat beer. I'm thinking about doing a hefe soon.
I tried wetting the grains with a spray bottle once after reading Kai's brewing wiki page and I had a problem with grains sticking to the hopper... I'll certainly have to try it again, but to be honest... I havnt been super pleased with my Malt Mill.. I'm thinking about selling it and getting a Crankenstein 3D
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|