The Great Bottle Opener Giveaway

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > Yeastcalc.com (Now two stir plate options?)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-12-2013, 03:50 AM   #1
bradfordmonk
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 86
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
Likes Given: 11

Default Yeastcalc.com (Now two stir plate options?)

Now this just got confusing...why are there all of a sudden two different stir plate options?

  1. Stir Plate (K. Troester)
  2. Stir Plate (J. Zainesheff)


And I get completely different sets of numbers for each. See below...Anyone know what the difference is...aside from numbers; and which should I go with?
screen-shot-2013-03-11-11.48.55-pm.jpg   screen-shot-2013-03-11-11.49.06-pm.jpg  
__________________
if it's too loud, turn it down
bradfordmonk is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2013, 05:10 AM   #2
Hermit
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Alternate Universe
Posts: 2,126
Liked 51 Times on 46 Posts
Likes Given: 10

Default

Kai shaking up the home brew world? Nice going dude.

__________________
Hermit is online now
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2013, 06:57 AM   #3
diS
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
diS's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Croatia
Posts: 1,018
Liked 45 Times on 43 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

Growth rates are not fully researched jet, that is the main reason why different authors states different results.
Yeastcalc is using results from 3 common resources:

Chris White researched growth rate at non-stirred starter, results are published in "Yeast".
Jamin Zainasheff then multiplied those results to get growth in stirred starter, I think he uses 2.5 as multiplier.
Kai Troester researched growth rate in stirred starter as function of growth per gram of extract.

That said, when using stirred starter you will make slightest mistake if you use Troester's growth rate. I think it is the best resource that we have at the moment, but I hope that further experiments will be made on this topic.

__________________

We are only 10,000 years into beer... there are thousands of years left to go!
Things are bound to change!!

Brewroom with HERMS build
Fermentation chamber and Keezer.. a.k.a. FermKeezer

diS is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2013, 09:16 AM   #4
bradfordmonk
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 86
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
Likes Given: 11

Default

Any idea as to which one was used before when there was only 1 option?

__________________
if it's too loud, turn it down
bradfordmonk is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2013, 11:47 AM   #5
raouliii
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
raouliii's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Posts: 739
Liked 56 Times on 49 Posts
Likes Given: 80

Default

Kai Troester has published information on this subject here.


Woodland Brewing published information related to yeast growth vs sugar concentration here.

On a related note, Woodland Brewing has also published viability test results, here, which call into question the viability calculations being used as well.

__________________
On Tap:
NippleRub Ultra
Ranger(ish) IPA clone
Horizocade Amber
Rochefort 7

In the Chamber:
Nada

Next Up:
Big Breasted Blonde
raouliii is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2013, 02:02 PM   #6
bradfordmonk
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 86
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
Likes Given: 11

Default

So you think I should go with the Troester option of Stir Plate? I would like to believe that, as I'd only have to make a 1 step starter @2L.

but the numbers are so widely different. So its tough to say...i do now when I've made yeast starters with step starters (I assume using the Zainesheff stir plate model being what was defaulted by yeastcalc before) that my fermentations were very vigurous and fast...maybe a dig that I had alot more cells than the calculator was estimating? Possibly?

__________________
if it's too loud, turn it down
bradfordmonk is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2013, 02:39 PM   #7
CloverBrew
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: waterloo, iowa
Posts: 117
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts
Likes Given: 9

Default

Kai's stirplate data la used in conjunction with sugar concentration data on brewersfriend also

__________________
CloverBrew is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2013, 06:59 PM   #8
bradfordmonk
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 86
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
Likes Given: 11

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CloverBrew View Post
Kai's stirplate data la used in conjunction with sugar concentration data on brewersfriend also
not sure what you mean. Are you saying that's what the option Troesters accounts for. If thats the case this seems better.
__________________
if it's too loud, turn it down
bradfordmonk is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2013, 07:04 PM   #9
WoodlandBrew
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
WoodlandBrew's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Malden, MA
Posts: 1,739
Liked 123 Times on 120 Posts
Likes Given: 57

Default

Thanks for the mention Rauliii.

Use Kai's equation. Especially if you let it ferment to completion. His equations were produced from stirred starters instead of scaling still starters. It also more closely follows Ballings observation.

If you really want to dial in the measurement of cell growth without a microscope there are some calculations that can be done based on starting gravity, and final gravity as measured with both a refractometer and hydrometer. But for all practical purposes, Kai's equation will get you plenty close.

On my blog is a comparison of various calculators and actual growth of over 50 starters. These were all still starters, but it may be of interest.

http://woodlandbrew.blogspot.com/201...revisited.html

__________________

The 2nd edition is now available: Brewing Engineering
BLOG: Brewing Boiled Down Brewing science for those of us without a Ph.D

WoodlandBrew is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2013, 08:13 PM   #10
JehovahsWitnessProtection
Registered User
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 34
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

.

__________________
JehovahsWitnessProtection is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dramatically improve your Stir Starter stir plate wildwest450 DIY Projects 27 03-24-2012 12:05 AM
first time stir plate user, how aggressive should i stir? wncbrewer Fermentation & Yeast 3 01-14-2012 01:35 AM
Stir Plate Motor Options? RonRock Equipment/Sanitation 15 06-08-2011 11:31 PM
Stir plate effectiveness concern-maybe too small of a stir bar? crlova2 Fermentation & Yeast 20 03-15-2011 06:06 PM
DIY Stir Plate, Stir Bar attracted to mounts littlejon326 DIY Projects 5 03-13-2011 02:12 PM