 |
|
03-12-2010, 03:03 PM
|
#31
|
|
Session ale enthusiast
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 689
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts Likes Given: 15
|
Update on my best bitter and this yeast.
I really like this yeast. While I wouldn't use it on all of my British beers, it would certainly be in rotation with 1968 and 1275. I like the hint of fruitiness that really shines through; I can see how this would be great with a porter. Yep, flocced out beautifully and attenuated really well - went from 1.044 to 1.011 after 10 days in primary and a week in secondary being dry-hopped.
I washed it three times and have three half pint jars with a nice, thick, white layer in the fridge.
|
|
|
03-12-2010, 03:28 PM
|
#32
|
|
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Thiensville, Wisconsin
Posts: 6,005
Liked 150 Times on 136 Posts Likes Given: 268
|
hm, i might have to try a stronger porter with c120 and this yeast.
|
|
|
03-12-2010, 03:41 PM
|
#33
|
|
fer-men-TAY-shuhn
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,907
Liked 160 Times on 128 Posts Likes Given: 133
|
Like a couple of others, I made a mild to get this yeast started, but now I’m trying to figure what to do next. So far in this thread there’s mention of: Mild, Porter, Old Ale, Pale Ale, Dark Mild, RIS, ESB, Best Bitter and Strong Porter.
Nugent’s Best Bitter looks tasty, and with the warmer weather coming, it would make a good seasonal transition beer. But he also mentioned a Pale Ale with Fuggles and Cascade, a combination that could work well for a springtime brew.
Have to weigh that against the “plan ahead” guy looking over my shoulder saying that KingBrianI’s idea for a RIS would be excellent planning for next fall/winter. Even a porter would age well.
There are just too many possibilities. Every time I make a decision, someone comes up with an idea that sounds irresistible. I’m so confused.
  
__________________
It’s best to brew dark beer at night, because that way the darkness gets into the beer. —Bohuslav Hlavsa
|
|
|
03-12-2010, 04:05 PM
|
#34
|
|
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Thiensville, Wisconsin
Posts: 6,005
Liked 150 Times on 136 Posts Likes Given: 268
|
yeah I battle with that every time I plan my next brew. right now it's going to be an IPA.
but i really wanna brew a kolsch soon to be ready by may-june.
i'd also like to brew a light vienna style for summer.
i'd also like to brew an Oktoberfest soon for a nice 6mo lager.
i'm also almost out of porter, and this ESB isn't gonna last long and it's tasty.....
decisions, decisions....
|
|
|
03-12-2010, 04:15 PM
|
#35
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 3,464
Liked 53 Times on 46 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnOldUR
Like a couple of others, I made a mild to get this yeast started, but now I’m trying to figure what to do next. So far in this thread there’s mention of: Mild, Porter, Old Ale, Pale Ale, Dark Mild, RIS, ESB, Best Bitter and Strong Porter.
Nugent’s Best Bitter looks tasty, and with the warmer weather coming, it would make a good seasonal transition beer. But he also mentioned a Pale Ale with Fuggles and Cascade, a combination that could work well for a springtime brew.
Have to weigh that against the “plan ahead” guy looking over my shoulder saying that KingBrianI’s idea for a RIS would be excellent planning for next fall/winter. Even a porter would age well.
There are just too many possibilities. Every time I make a decision, someone comes up with an idea that sounds irresistible. I’m so confused.
  
|
The fuggles and cascade pale ale actually sounds really good. Have you ever tried shipyard's IPA? It's all fuggles I believe and uses ringwood yeast. Anyway, the flavorful yeast and the fuggles really play nicely together, and I think this yeast, with it's subtle fruitiness would work in a fuggles pale ale really well.
__________________
I'm too lazy and have too many beers going to keep updating this!
|
|
|
03-12-2010, 04:47 PM
|
#36
|
|
fer-men-TAY-shuhn
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,907
Liked 160 Times on 128 Posts Likes Given: 133
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingBrianI
The fuggles and cascade pale ale actually sounds really good. . . . this yeast, with it's subtle fruitiness would work in a fuggles pale ale really well.
|
You know, I think you've convinced me which direction to go. Wondering where this would fall in BJCP land. There's an overlap in the guidelines between a Best Bitter and an APA. The yeast would push it in the English Pale Ale direction, but the Cascade would give it some American character. A loose plan would be Maris Otter as a base grain, 1.045-1.050 OG, 35-40 IBU's, Cascade for bittering / flavor and Fuggles for flavor / aroma. Just out of curiosity, where do you think this would land in terms of style?
__________________
It’s best to brew dark beer at night, because that way the darkness gets into the beer. —Bohuslav Hlavsa
|
|
|
03-12-2010, 04:54 PM
|
#37
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 3,464
Liked 53 Times on 46 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnOldUR
You know, I think you've convinced me which direction to go. Wondering where this would fall in BJCP land. There's an overlap in the guidelines between a Best Bitter and an APA. The yeast would push it in the English Pale Ale direction, but the Cascade would give it some American character. A loose plan would be Maris Otter as a base grain, 1.045-1.050 OG, 35-40 IBU's, Cascade for bittering / flavor and Fuggles for flavor / aroma. Just out of curiosity, where do you think this would land in terms of style?
|
I would gravitate towards calling it an English Pale Ale (8C). The american hops are allowed in the style and I think the malt flavor from the maris otter and flavorful yeast would take it a bit out of style for an APA.
__________________
I'm too lazy and have too many beers going to keep updating this!
|
|
|
03-13-2010, 01:23 PM
|
#38
|
|
fer-men-TAY-shuhn
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,907
Liked 160 Times on 128 Posts Likes Given: 133
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgo737
Anyone have any tips? Damn near impossible to differentiate WLP002 yeast chunks from trub...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajf
Follow the above mentioned thread Yeast Washing Illustrated , but only wait 5 minutes instead of 20. That's what I do, and it works well. -a.
|
Love the search feature. Dug these posts up while trying to wash my Wyeast 1882-PC and having the same problem. Looking for some conformation that it's the yeast and not something that I may have done wrong. Anyone mind sharing their experience washing this stuff?
__________________
It’s best to brew dark beer at night, because that way the darkness gets into the beer. —Bohuslav Hlavsa
|
|
|
03-13-2010, 03:32 PM
|
#39
|
|
Session ale enthusiast
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 689
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts Likes Given: 15
|
It's chunky like 1968. I threw a gallon of sterilized water (boiled for 20 mins. and cooled) into my FV and gave it a really good swirl. It eventually started breaking up. There was a lot of material collected at the bottom of the jug that I decanted into after 10 mins, but lots in suspension as well. Decanted the suspended material, gave the jug a shake and repeated.
As mentioned before, after three washings (the yeast is currently sitting under sterilized water only) I managed to get three half pint jars with about 3/8" of creamy, white yeast. The additional washings got the darker, presumably dead yeast out of it, as for as I can tell.
According to Jamil's Yeast Calculator, I would need about 5 tbsps of thick slurry to have enough cells to pitch directly, based on the ever dropping viability. Won't have enough with what I have, so I'll make a big ol' starter to get it going again. Will repeat the same process again after the next brew. Jamil, as well as the brewer that I brewed with at Granville Island Brewing (Vancouver, Canada), that later generations do a better job and make the beer taste better. I guess I'll find out.
Anyway, hope this helps.
Last edited by Nugent; 03-13-2010 at 05:51 PM.
|
|
|
03-13-2010, 05:00 PM
|
#40
|
|
fer-men-TAY-shuhn
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,907
Liked 160 Times on 128 Posts Likes Given: 133
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nugent
As mentioned before, after three washings (the yeast is currently sitting under sterilized water only) I managed to get three half pint jars with about 3/8" of creamy, white yeast. The additional washings got the darker, presumably dead yeast out of it, as for as I can tell. . . Anyway, hope this help.
|
I must have skimmed over your “three washing” post, but that's a interesting coincidence. It also took me three washings before I was happy with the results. Ended up with about 6 fluid ounces of clean yeast.
The picture below is what remained after the final wash. I added more water to it just to see how it would settle out. The new liquid is on top, a thin layer of yeast and a lot of trub at the bottom. What I have in the refrigerator is all like that thin layer. The volume and make-up of the bottom layer has me baffled. I don’t get it when using the exact same technique with other yeasts. Why do these British strains produce this stuff and what is it?
__________________
It’s best to brew dark beer at night, because that way the darkness gets into the beer. —Bohuslav Hlavsa
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|