Ss Brewing Technologies Giveaway!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > wlp005 (1187) vs wlp002 (1968)
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-07-2011, 10:25 PM   #1
jubelale
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 70
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default wlp005 (1187) vs wlp002 (1968)

Has anybody done a side by side comparison of these two English yeasts?

__________________
jubelale is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-08-2011, 03:19 AM   #2
Nugent
Session ale enthusiast
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Nugent's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 692
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts
Likes Given: 15

Default

I have used both yeasts in the same recipe with the same hopping.

1968 is quite fruity and has a sweet character. It certain allows the malt to come through and make for a balanced beer as long as the hops are there in a big way.

1187 is less fruity, but still adds a unique quality to the beer; Wyeast calls it 'estery'. It makes for a beer with a drier maltiness and the hops come through really well.

I'm a big fan of both.

__________________
Nugent is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-08-2011, 03:31 AM   #3
strat_thru_marshall
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,679
Liked 27 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 32

Default

I find that 005 gives a slightly drier beer, slight "mineral" ester, and compliments English malts in a very nice way. I prefer it to 002.

I have not done a side-by-side, but I have used both and know that for milds and E.brown ales I like the 005.

__________________
strat_thru_marshall is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-08-2011, 11:41 AM   #4
SwampassJ
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 2,162
Liked 37 Times on 34 Posts
Likes Given: 53

Default

Not in the same beer but at the same time. I like 002 more, it's got a sweeter frutier taste. Although in my case the beer with 002 attenuated 75% and the 005 only hit 65% and that's with gentle swirling several times a day throughout fermentation. So far uncarbed it tastes a little mineraly and earthy. I wouldn't call it fruity at all, but the hops/malt combo I used might push it more to the earthy side.

I spent an hour trying to wash the 005 and just said **** it. I have never dealt with a bigger pain the ass. No matter what I did or how many step downs in container size I just could not get a respectable amount of yeast, it settled at about the same speed as the hops and trubs so it's all mixed together.

__________________

BLAH BLAH BLAH

SwampassJ is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-08-2011, 01:05 PM   #5
strat_thru_marshall
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,679
Liked 27 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 32

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SwampassJ View Post

I spent an hour trying to wash the 005 and just said **** it. I have never dealt with a bigger pain the ass. No matter what I did or how many step downs in container size I just could not get a respectable amount of yeast, it settled at about the same speed as the hops and trubs so it's all mixed together.
yes, 005 does not flocc out as hard and fast as 002. I have had success re-pitching it for several generations however.
__________________
strat_thru_marshall is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-08-2011, 03:19 PM   #6
bierhaus15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: , New York
Posts: 1,511
Liked 71 Times on 51 Posts
Likes Given: 10

Default

Top cropping is practically required with wlp005 to get a clean repitch. Wlp002 also works great.

__________________
bierhaus15 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-26-2012, 01:30 PM   #7
BaldApe
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Calvert County, Maryland, USA
Posts: 30
Likes Given: 2

Default

I'm late to this party, but I have a Mild in two carboys right now, one with 002 and the other with 005. I find the 002 much fruitier and much more flocculent.

Both were fermented with 1 qt starters, new yeast from the vial. Both started in the mid 60s in glass carboys, then brought to room temp (low-mid 70s) to make room for a lager in my fermentation cooler.

002 seems slower to reduce the diacetyl, in fact I don't think I tasted diacetyl in the 005, but my taste threshold for diacetyl isn't all that low.

Plan on kegging today. If I have anything to add, I'll let you know in a few days

__________________
BaldApe is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply



Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wyeast Ringwood (1187) Attenuation dmbRedGetta Fermentation & Yeast 4 09-14-2011 04:57 PM
Best Uses of Wyeast 1187 Ringwood Ale strain OldManHouston Fermentation & Yeast 10 04-10-2011 06:52 PM
1187 Ringwood GRHunter Fermentation & Yeast 13 02-22-2011 11:42 PM
WLP005 good sub for WLP002? johnnyc Fermentation & Yeast 5 05-14-2010 12:10 PM
Wlp005 rwinzing Fermentation & Yeast 5 02-28-2010 08:00 PM