Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > To secondary or not, redux




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-2012, 05:15 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 636
Liked 101 Times on 77 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default To secondary or not, redux

First off, hi to all--I've read this board for a long time but never posted--seems like all my questions have already been asked answered a dozen times here over the past few years. However, I do have a lingering question regarding something that has been touched on several times--namely, the effect of racking to a secondary on beer clarity.

So here's the deal: I've read the arguments for leaving your beer (esp. ales) on the primary yeast cake, and I've found over the course of my brewing (probably 50-60 batches over eight years) that I agree. The yeast are able to do a better "cleanup" job when you let them sit for at least a couple of weeks. However, I still rack to a secondary, usually two or three weeks into fermentation, and I find that it does make for a clearer beer, primarily I think because when I subsequently rack to my bottling bucket I can do so without fear of stirring up much trub.

Now, I know there are plenty of other ways to enhance clarity--gelatin, whirfloc, moss, cold crashing, etc. I'm not crazy about adding a bunch of extra stuff to my beer (although I do occasionally use Irish moss), and I usually cold crash my secondary before racking to the bottling bucket. So my question is, holding all other techniques constant, does racking to the secondary really improve beer clarity, or am I imagining things? For example, if I split a recipe at fermentation and did them like so:

A) Primary: 2 weeks, Secondary: 1 week, Bottle age: 4 weeks
B) Primary: 3 weeks, Bottle age: 4 weeks

Would A be any clearer than B, or would there be no difference? I may have to give this a shot, because if there's really no reason to do this it'll save me a step, albeit one of the simpler steps in my process. I'm aware of the counter arguments regarding additional risk of contamination, etc, but that's not what I'm interested in here.

Thoughts?


jerrodm is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-12-2012, 05:58 PM   #2
Recovering from Sobriety
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
osagedr's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 2,371
Liked 78 Times on 67 Posts
Likes Given: 21

Default

Paging Revvy...


__________________
2012 Canadian Brewer of the Year

@evilgoatbrewing
osagedr is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-12-2012, 07:57 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 444
Liked 15 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 14

Default

This question always provokes a lot of hysteria. I don’t know why people feel so strongly whether or not somebody else goes to secondary.

You don’t have to, that’s for sure.

I think it depends on a lot of things. I used to use WL004 Irish yeast with a small ale that went to bottle in a couple or three weeks. Two or three days in secondary cleared it a lot.

The big caveat is to be sure not to go to secondary too soon. Be sure you have hit FG or you risk a stuck fermentation.

Try it both ways and decide for yourself.
Wynne-R is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-12-2012, 08:31 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 636
Liked 101 Times on 77 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

Yes, I know this is one topic where people seem to be stuck on different sides of the fence. Maybe I'll need to run my experiment. If I do, I'll take pictures and post here.
jerrodm is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-12-2012, 10:37 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Glenview, IL
Posts: 3,921
Liked 235 Times on 218 Posts
Likes Given: 87

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerrodm
Yes, I know this is one topic where people seem to be stuck on different sides of the fence. Maybe I'll need to run my experiment. If I do, I'll take pictures and post here.
It basically comes down to you whatever works best for you and your process is what you roll with, technically there is no right or wrong. The only important thing to consider is if you choose to secondary be sure fermentation is complete.
__________________
Nothing Left to do but smile and drink beer.....

The Commune Brewing Company-Perfecting the "art" of beer since 2010
duboman is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-13-2012, 01:06 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 185
Liked 36 Times on 23 Posts

Default

Racking to a second vessel does not clear a beer any more or any faster than leaving it in primary. It's just the same beer in another container exposed to more oxygen.

That said, If you're not careful when you rack from primary you can stir up a lot of yeast/trub and it'll end up in suspension for a little bit. If you can rack from primary carefully- do that, no secondary. If for some reason you can't, then I guess secondary. It doesn't really need to be a week though. whatever you stir up will settle out in 1-3 days depending on temp.
__________________
Primary: American Brown Ale
Kegged: American Pale Ale V2

On Deck: American Pale Ale V3
Brown Porter
JesperX is online now
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-13-2012, 01:13 PM   #7
Brewer / Designer
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mtyquinn's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Meriden, Connecticut
Posts: 99
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

I'm for leaving it on the yeast cake longer and avoiding trub in the transfer. (I do use whirfloc) Then it's just a matter of time for the beer to clear.
__________________
www.thestudiopub.com

Your Labels. On Tap.
mtyquinn is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-13-2012, 01:15 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 106
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Can someone explain to me what whirflock is? I see a lot people talk about it.
Southern_Junior is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-13-2012, 01:27 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 101
Liked 13 Times on 5 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

A blend of Irish Moss and purified Kappa carrageenan that encourages the precipitation of haze causing materials such as proteins and Beta glucans. Prepared in a quick dissolving, highly soluble tablet form. Almost everyone who tries Whirlfloc tablets prefer them to regular Irish Moss.
Add for the final 5 minutes of the boil.

From the MoreBeer.com site...
TheBiGZ is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-13-2012, 01:34 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,098
Liked 40 Times on 35 Posts
Likes Given: 34

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesperX View Post
Racking to a second vessel does not clear a beer any more or any faster than leaving it in primary. It's just the same beer in another container exposed to more oxygen.
I've seen evidence otherwise. Basic Brewing Radio has pictures showing a belgian-style beer clearing much faster when racked to secondary.


afr0byte is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Latest Lager Redux - what I have learned. bernerbrau Fermentation & Yeast 54 04-12-2012 11:38 PM
To Secondary or Not to Secondary? LarsonLE Fermentation & Yeast 37 03-23-2011 06:42 AM
Fermentation redux?? (Am I stuck?) meporsche Fermentation & Yeast 4 02-21-2010 05:43 PM
My first secondary. I officially HATE secondary DansBrew Fermentation & Yeast 18 02-11-2010 04:07 PM
Too Secondary or not to secondary...that is the question. permo Fermentation & Yeast 9 12-20-2009 04:41 PM



FOLLOW US ON