 |
|
11-28-2012, 08:07 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Whitman, MA, Massachusetts
Posts: 233
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
|
HUUUGE Starter!
|
|
I'm about to brew a Maibock with an projected OG of 1.070. I'm relatively new to lagers, and I just want to make sure my yeast preparation is not going to be a problem. Instead of multiple vials of yeast in a smaller starter, I want to pitch a single vial into a 7 liter starter (per mr. malty). I've never even heard of a starter this large, but I'm able to get my stir plate to spin 7 liters in my bottling bucket so I figured I'd give it a shot. Any downside to doing this? Obviously the water I tested the stir plate with doesn't spin too vigoriously, but there is a tiny little vortex in the middle. Anyone try this before? How did it go? Thanks!
__________________
Uhhhm...
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 08:12 PM
|
#2
|
|
Brewing Thespian
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Terryville, CT
Posts: 1,663
Liked 83 Times on 75 Posts Likes Given: 61
|
Just a thought on an alternate approach: Playing with YeastCalc.com (it allows you to play with steps) it looks like you could also get there in two steps - just do a 1.7L starter, decant, and pitch the slurry into a second 1.7L starter. Might be a little easier to manage than a 7L starter in your bucket.
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 08:16 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 524
Liked 48 Times on 44 Posts Likes Given: 8
|
According to yeastcalc you could get really close with a 1 liter starter stepped up to 2 liters if you start with a fresh packet of yeast.
Last edited by stpug; 11-28-2012 at 08:17 PM.
Reason: darn tablets are slow to type
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 08:26 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: minneapolis, minnesota
Posts: 1,402
Liked 111 Times on 102 Posts Likes Given: 36
|
I'll second yeast calculator. I just recently discovered that site and find it way more user friendly than Mr. Malty and it allows you to do the steps which I just used for a pilsner I did.
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 08:51 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Whitman, MA, Massachusetts
Posts: 233
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
|
Ah, yes that does sound much easier! Although, I was kinda starting to get a little excited about my giant starter... But I suppose I'll stick with the more sensible approach. Thanks all!
__________________
Uhhhm...
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 08:54 PM
|
#6
|
|
AHA Member
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 11,952
Liked 433 Times on 391 Posts Likes Given: 266
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtrman13
Ah, yes that does sound much easier! Although, I was kinda starting to get a little excited about my giant starter... But I suppose I'll stick with the more sensible approach. Thanks all!
|
I've gone with two, and three, stepped starters to get more cells than you could with a 20L+ starter. Especially when using older packets of yeast (more than a few months old). With either a 2L or 3L flask, you can do two, or three, starter steps for pretty much anything you would brew (in a batch size of up to 10-12 gallons).
__________________
My RocketHub Project
Hopping Tango Brewery
跟猴子比丟屎 ・ Gun HOE-tze bee DIO-se
On Tap: Caramel Ale, Mocha Porter II, MO SMaSH IPA
Waiting/Carbonating: 12.5% Wee Honey II, 8.9% Old Ale, English Brown Ale, Lickah ESB, Mocha Porter II
Fermenting
K1: MO SMaSH IPA
K2:
K3: TripSix
On Deck: Caramel Ale
Aging:mead
Mead [bottled]:Oaked Wildflower Traditional, Mocha Madness, Blackberry Melomel, maple wine
...the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
|
|
|
11-29-2012, 06:57 AM
|
#7
|
|
call me kees van vlees
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: utrecht, netherlands
Posts: 1,549
Liked 118 Times on 95 Posts Likes Given: 6
|
in zainasheff&white's YEAST book they explain pretty well, and show a simple experiment to back up the idea, that as you decrease your pitching rate, you decrease your 'yield factor' (cell count increase per degree plato consumed). practically, that means that as you pitch your pack into larger and larger starter wort volumes, at some point you reach a cutoff where the yield starts to decrease. you still get more yeast out from a larger starter than a smaller one, as there is more sugar and more yeast growth, just that in a huge starter, for each gram of DME you are getting fewer cells in return. in their experiment they pitched 1 pack/vial into different sized starters and measured the growth rates, the optimal results were in the 1-2L range, but from 0.8 to 8 liters were in the same ballpark, and still perfectly acceptable for the homebrewer. of course these rates are calculated for you in yeastcalc.com, as the others have pointed out, play with the numbers and starter sizes on the website and see what works for you! and these experiments were done with a fresh 100 billion cells, whereas shipped packs of course have significant viability dropoff; so if you're really pitching 10 billion cells into 7 L, your yield factor may be really on the downward slope of the curve, and you will really benefit from a smaller step-up. thanks for the excuse to go back and re-read that section of the book.
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 01:53 PM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Malden, MA
Posts: 1,403
Liked 96 Times on 93 Posts Likes Given: 51
|
Call me crazy, but for 5 gallons of a 1.070 lager a single 7 litter starter sounds small. I would think you would need about 500 billion cells if my math is right. That's a "growth factor" of 4, or a yield of 5 times the initial cell count. It would take three sequential 3 litter starters to get there according to yeast calc.
Might I propose an alternative:
Pitch 100 billion cells into 1 gallon of your wort on brew day. On the following day add the remainder of the wort.
There are two reasons why it should be one gallon. First, Mr. Malty tells us that 100 billion cells in 1 gallon of 1.070 wort is the correct pitch rate for a lager. Secound, cell growth is roughly proportional to the amount of sugar, so pitching into one gallon of your wort will produce about 500 billion cells. And bonus, there is no wasted DME or time spent on a starter.
__________________
Woodland Brewing Company Brewing science for those of us without a Ph.D
BLOG: Brewing Boiled Down and learn more on The WBC You Tube Channel Ready to drink: Champagne Cider, 50c 28c and 19c Ale, Adventinus clone. Up next: Douppleweizenbock, Eisbock, Saision Terri, Raspberry Cream Ale
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 02:02 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 193
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts Likes Given: 10
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodlandBrew
Call me crazy, but for 5 gallons of a 1.070 lager a single 7 litter starter sounds small. I would think you would need about 500 billion cells if my math is right. That's a "growth factor" of 4, or a yield of 5 times the initial cell count. It would take three sequential 3 litter starters to get there according to yeast calc.
Might I propose an alternative:
Pitch 100 billion cells into 1 gallon of your wort on brew day. On the following day add the remainder of the wort.
Cell growth is roughly proportional to the amount of sugar, so pitching into one gallon of your wort will produce about 500 billion cells. And bonus, there is no wasted DME or time spent on a starter.
|
Yes, but for many brewers this raises the concern of where to put the infection-risk wort that isn't fermenting for a day. Another plastic fermenter is cheap, sure, but I think there are some other added risk factors you would be getting into by using this method.
That being said, it's also kind of a cool idea. It isn't much different than say, fermenting a large batch of belgian beer and adding sugar after a few ays of primary. Sure, the purposes are different, but the risks of opening the bucket and sanitation are nearly the same, minus the risk for infecting the 4ish gallons of wort for your proposed method.
__________________
Bottles on hand:
(1) Breakfast in Bed
(2) American-British Collision Amber Ale
(3) Belma's Lovely IPA
(4) Belma's Lovely Cream Ale
Primary:
(1) Donkey Kong Belgian Brown aged on Sugar Whiskey Staves
(2) Empty
Secondary:
(1) Empty
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 02:10 PM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cincy, OH
Posts: 710
Liked 64 Times on 53 Posts Likes Given: 32
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodlandBrew
Might I propose an alternative:
Pitch 100 billion cells into 1 gallon of your wort on brew day. On the following day add the remainder of the wort..
|
What a practical and good idea!
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|