Happy HolidaySs Giveaway - Winners Re-Re-Re-Re-Drawn - 24 hours to Claim!

Get your HBT Growlers, Shirts and Membership before the Rush!


Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > Ever used 1275, Thames Valley Ale?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-22-2014, 01:40 AM   #1
bzwyatt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 446
Liked 30 Times on 24 Posts

Default Ever used 1275, Thames Valley Ale?

I am making an ESB with it. I made one a while back, didn't like it much, but I've overhauled my recipe to give it another shot. 1275 isn't a really common ESB yeast, but when I was looking for a yeast to use I picked it because I love the way Thames is pronounced. I just love that word and anything called 'Thames Valley' is awesome.

So I checked the profile on Wyeast's site

https://www.wyeastlab.com/hb_yeastst...ail.cfm?ID=138

and it says flocculation is Medium-Low. I'm going to do other research, but how will that compare to a yeast that has high flocculation? Will it have more yeast in suspension after it is done? Should I cold-crash it, or chill it in the bottle for longer before drinking if I don't want a lot of yeast flavor? Or will it just make a really dry beer because yeast stay suspended in the beer longer? I'm guessing not, because attenuation is 72-76%, and that is independent of flocculation, right?

So is this going to make a more 'yeasty' beer?

The description says it is clean, but how can that be if it has low flocculation?

__________________
bzwyatt is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-22-2014, 05:34 AM   #2
highgravitybacon
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 904
Liked 205 Times on 144 Posts
Likes Given: 152

Default

What was it you didn't like about the beer you made?

__________________
highgravitybacon is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-22-2014, 05:47 AM   #3
Gar
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 212
Liked 24 Times on 21 Posts
Likes Given: 22

Default

made a 20 gallon batch of stout about 15-16 months ago and seperated it into 5 gallon batches and used different yeast in each one. thames valley was one of them. ive not set and tried a side by side but a few guys at the LHBS did and all of them liked thames valley the best.

__________________
Gar is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-22-2014, 07:41 AM   #4
bzwyatt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 446
Liked 30 Times on 24 Posts

Default

Too malty, hops presence was not smooth. Just a bad recipe I think, made it on a whim in beersmith.

I'm hopeful for this one, just know more about yeast now (and every other aspect of brewing) than I did then so I'm wondering about anybody else's experience with 1275.

__________________
bzwyatt is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-22-2014, 12:12 PM   #5
CastleHollow
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CastleHollow's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Midlothian, VA
Posts: 672
Liked 101 Times on 72 Posts
Likes Given: 60

Default

I use it every year in the fall at hop harvest time to brew a "wet hopped" brown ale. I found a number of SN Tumbler clone recipes that used it. My recipe calls for 85% MO/10% C60 and then equal parts chocolate + smoked malt, with Centennial hops for bittering and Cascade late additions. Thames Valley definitely gives the beer a nice malty profile, but a clean finish--I think it tastes very fresh.

I use whirlfloc, about a month in fermentation, and then a 2 day cold crash before packaging and it always clears beautifully in the bottle.

__________________
CastleHollow is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-22-2014, 12:44 PM   #6
bzwyatt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 446
Liked 30 Times on 24 Posts

Default

Oh sounds nice.
Thanks for replies.

Is it a slow starter?

I've never had a yeast do this - about 18 hours after pitching, almost all the trub was floating and the airlock was bubbling but it was still, mostly, under all the floating solids.

After about 36 hours it is actively fermenting, all swimming and swirling.

My yeast wasn't so fresh and I didn't make a starter. That is probably why it started slow, but I've heard some strains (irish yeast, is it wlp004?, is one) start slow. Is 1275 like that?

__________________
bzwyatt is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-22-2014, 01:27 PM   #7
cavemanbrews
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
cavemanbrews's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Midlothian, Texas
Posts: 21
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

I made the NB's Elevenses recipe with it and also did not make a starter. My take off time with it was a little longer more like 24 hours, pitched at 74* then into the chamber and got it down to 66* I believe. The finished beer was clear from the bottle even with disturbing the sediment on the bottom of the bottle. It seemed to be a pretty neutral yeast to me but that’s just my opinion.

__________________
cavemanbrews is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-22-2014, 02:45 PM   #8
bzwyatt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 446
Liked 30 Times on 24 Posts

Default

I used two jars of clean rinsed yeast. Normally I make a starter with one, but since I didn't make a starter and it has been a couple months since I rinsed it, I used both jars.

It was about 62 though, kinda forgot about the temp. That definitely could have slowed the start some.

Sounds like everything is good and this should be a good beer.

Thanks again for responses.

__________________
bzwyatt is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-22-2014, 04:00 PM   #9
highgravitybacon
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 904
Liked 205 Times on 144 Posts
Likes Given: 152

Default

The Wyeast description of yeast says its really clean, enough so that it's suitable for an alt. Is this a temperature-dependent thing? I want some light to moderate amount of British esters for a stout.

__________________
highgravitybacon is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-22-2014, 04:15 PM   #10
Conman13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 174
Liked 18 Times on 15 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

I used it on the NB Elevenses recipe also. I thought the beer turned out absolutely fantastic, and very clear. I cold crashed for 24 hours before kegging and pretty much everything floculated out. The yeast character was very neutral, if not slightly nutty and british tasting. I fermented at about 66F. I think it's a terrific yeast.

I don't think you should have any concerns of a yeasty flavor, or low flocculation based on my experience with this yeast.

__________________
Conman13 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply



Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What to make with Wyeast 1275 Thames Valley DurangoMatt Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 6 08-10-2013 04:03 AM
Wyeast Thames Valley Ale Yeast #1275 Yooper Recipes/Ingredients 12 11-10-2011 03:17 AM
Wyeast Thames Valley Ale 1275 USM_Eagle Recipes/Ingredients 7 04-03-2011 06:27 PM
Anyone used Wyeast 1275 Thames Valley Ale? FlyGuy Recipes/Ingredients 5 08-15-2007 12:40 PM
Wyeast 1275 Thames Valley mysterio Recipes/Ingredients 2 01-27-2007 07:12 PM



Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS