Get your HBT Growlers, Shirts and Membership before the Rush!


Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > Dry vs. Liquid yeast?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-07-2010, 06:06 PM   #1
maxamuus
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 873
Liked 64 Times on 53 Posts
Likes Given: 34

Default Dry vs. Liquid yeast?

Did a search as i am sure this has been discussed but could seem to find anything.

Fixing to order beer number 4. I notice dry yeast is quite a bit cheaper. Are there any draw back to using dry vs. liquid? I have only used liquid so far and had great results. Just wonder if the extra money is worth it as dry yeast is inferior yeast?

Thanks.

__________________
maxamuus is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-07-2010, 06:16 PM   #2
Revvy
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Revvy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: "Detroitish" Michigan
Posts: 40,804
Liked 2776 Times on 1660 Posts
Likes Given: 3489

Default

It's been done to death here;

http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f36/dry-...-liquid-75697/

http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f12/dry-...d-yeast-45174/

It's a personal preference, they both make beer....I tend ot use more dry than anything else...it's way more cost effective....but there are more wet strains and you can wash an reuse or store..It's not really a vs question...they both work..It's NOT a superority thing at all....they all are excellent.

I have found that a lot of new brewers especially, THINK they HAVE to use liquid yeast, but in reality most ales can be made with Notty, Windsor, Us-05, Us-04 and many lagers with basic Saflager.....7-8 bucks a pop for liquid as opposed to $1.50-2.50 for dry, with more cell count, is imho just a waste of money for the majority of a brewer's recipe bank...most commercial ales us a limited range of strains, and those liquid strains are really the same strains that the afore mentioned dry strains cover, for example Us-05 is the famed "Chico strain", so if you are paying 7-8 bucks for Wyeast 1056 American/Chico Ale Yeast, and you STILL have to make a starter to have enough viable cells, then you are ripping yourself off, in terms of time and money....

I use dry yeast for 99% of my beers, for basic ales I use safale 05, for more british styles I us safale 04 and for basic lagers I use saflager..

The only time I use liquid yeast is if I am making a beer where the yeast drives the style, where certain flavor characteristics are derived from the yeast, such as phenols. Like Belgian beers, where you get spicy/peppery flavors from the yeast and higher temp fermentation. Or let's say a wheat beer (needing a lowly flocculant yest) or a Kholsch, where the style of the beer uses a specific yeast strain that is un available in dry form.

But if you are looking for a "clean" yeast profile, meaning about 90% of american ales, the 05, or nottingham is the way to go. Need "Bready" or yeasty for English ales, then 04 or windsor. Want a clean, low profile lager yeast- saflager usually does the trick.

Here's some info here, http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f163/dry...ptions-131810/

__________________

Like my snazzy new avatar? Get Sons of Zymurgy swag, here, and brew with the best.

Revvy's one of the cool reverends. He has a Harley and a t-shirt that says on the back "If you can read this, the bitch was Raptured. - Madman

I gotta tell ya, just between us girls, that Revvy is HOT. Very tall, gorgeous grey hair and a terrific smile. He's very good looking in person, with a charismatic personality... he drives like a ****ing maniac! - YooperBrew

Revvy is offline
spatman Likes This 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-07-2010, 06:33 PM   #3
oceanselv
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Holly Springs, NC
Posts: 470
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

As Revvy said it is a matter of preference and when the yeast drives the style. I also like to use a liquid slap pack when I have not prepared a starter. When properly used a slap pack will swell and let you know the yeast is good.

__________________
Das Leben is zu kurz um schiess Bier zu trinken
oceanselv is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-07-2010, 07:14 PM   #4
SumnerH
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alexandria, VA, USA
Posts: 2,058
Liked 26 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceanselv View Post
I also like to use a liquid slap pack when I have not prepared a starter. When properly used a slap pack will swell and let you know the yeast is good.
If you're not going to make a starter, dry yeast is almost always a better option.

For a 1.055 OG ale, you generally want to pitch about 200 billion cells per 5 gallons.

An 11.5g packet of dry yeast (your typical US-05, Nottingham, S-04, etc) has about 200 billion viable yeast cells--there's no need to make a starter for most beers.

A Wyeast slap pack or White Labs vial of liquid yeast has about 100 billion cells, though. If you use it without a starter, you're likely to be underpitching by a fair amount. Even with a not-too-huge 1.055 ale, you'll want a 1.2 liter starter in order to get the cell count up to the ideal level (assuming you shake it every 30-60 minutes when it's getting going--more like 2 liters if you're just going to set it aside and forget it).

http://www.mrmalty.com/calc/calc.html has a useful pitching-rate calculator that helps figure out when a starter is needed and how big it should be.
__________________

On deck: Little Bo Pils, Bretta Off Dead (Brett pale)
Secondary: Oude Bruin, Red Sky at Morning (Sour brown ale)
On tap: Saison Duphunk (sour), Amarillo Slim (IPA), Earl White (ginger/bergamot wit)
Bottled: Number 8 (Belgian Strong Dark Ale), Eternale (Barleywine), Ancho Villa (Ancho/pasilla/chocolate/cinnamon RIS), Oak smoked porter (1/2 maple bourbon oaked, 1/2 apple brandy oaked)

SumnerH is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-08-2010, 05:09 PM   #5
bguzz
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 122
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

I have a stirplate and can really grow yeast when needed. That being said, I turn to US05 dry yeast for almost all my american ales/IPA's, it works great and I want neutral anyway. I can't see any reason to do starters of WLP001 or WY1056 for those kinds of beers.

__________________
bguzz is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-08-2010, 05:15 PM   #6
DrawTap88
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 1,074
Liked 9 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 10

Default

If you're going to use dry yeast, don't forget to rehydrate it before pitching (debatable).

Also, +1 to what Revvy said.

__________________

Fermenting: Nothing
Secondary: Nothing
Bottled: Oatmeal Porter, Double Chocolate Chipotle Porter
Kegged: IPA, Red Rye

DrawTap88 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-08-2010, 05:29 PM   #7
mithion
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 395
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts

Default

I got caught in the whole liquid is better than dry thing that was going on a few years back. I recently "rediscovered" dry yeast and found it to be of great value. Unless you're cloning a specific beer with an unusual yeast character, S-04 and US-05 from Safale will get you through most commonly consumed beers with fantastic results. I don't much experience with Danstar but it seems a lot of people swear by their Nottingham strand. However, I cannot speak for other brands of dry yeast like muntons and coopers.

I still use mostly liquid just because I like to experiment with different yeast strands. When I decide last minute to brew a batch of beer, I gladly reach for Safale products to bail me out of having to do a starter.

__________________

Primary:
Secondary: Chimay Tripel #1
Conditioning: The Day After Christmas Eve Old Ale, Phil's Classic English #2
Drinking: Irish Rebellion
Next Beer: Earthly Brown

mithion is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-08-2010, 07:52 PM   #8
SumnerH
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alexandria, VA, USA
Posts: 2,058
Liked 26 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mithion View Post
I got caught in the whole liquid is better than dry thing that was going on a few years back. I recently "rediscovered" dry yeast and found it to be of great value. Unless you're cloning a specific beer with an unusual yeast character, S-04 and US-05 from Safale will get you through most commonly consumed beers with fantastic results
Hmm. I'd say almost no German, Czech, or Belgian styles can sub either of those yeasts (heck, 95% of German styles are either lagers or hefes)--that's a pretty huge chunk of the styles out there. And lagers are certainly the most commonly consumed beers in the world.

I'd say less than half of my brewing could sub US-05 or S-04 pretty well. In reality, I use it more like a third of the time. It's beautifully easy to work with, though, and I always keep it around for emergencies or spontaneous brew days.

Just for fun, the yeasts I used for beers in my .sig:
Little Bo Pils--Wyeast Czech Pils
Oude Bruin--Wyeast Roeselaire + various dregs
Saison Duphunk--Wyeast French Saison + Orval dregs + Roeselaire
Stanley Steamer (Cali common)--Wyeast California Lager
St James Gate Stout (dry irish stout)--Wyeast Irish Ale
Earl White--Wyeast Belgian witbier
Saison Laurentian: Wyeast French Saison
Centennial IPA: Safale US-05
Toil and Trouble (Scottish 80/-): Wyeast Scottish ale
Number 8 (Belgian Strong Dark Ale): Wyeast Belgian Strong
Eternale (Barleywine): Wyeast Scottish ale
Ancho Villa (Ancho/pasilla/chocolate/cinnamon RIS): Safale US-05

The barleywine, St James stout, and scottish 80/- could've been done with S-04/US-05 and been fairly close. The cali common could maybe sub US-05 but that's really a stretch (and, honestly, the yeast is sort of what defines the style). The Pils, Oude Bruin, saison, funked saison, wit, and belgian strong dark wouldn't be anything like the same beer with those 2 yeasts, though saflager might do okay in the pils.
__________________

On deck: Little Bo Pils, Bretta Off Dead (Brett pale)
Secondary: Oude Bruin, Red Sky at Morning (Sour brown ale)
On tap: Saison Duphunk (sour), Amarillo Slim (IPA), Earl White (ginger/bergamot wit)
Bottled: Number 8 (Belgian Strong Dark Ale), Eternale (Barleywine), Ancho Villa (Ancho/pasilla/chocolate/cinnamon RIS), Oak smoked porter (1/2 maple bourbon oaked, 1/2 apple brandy oaked)

SumnerH is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-09-2010, 06:58 AM   #9
JuanMoore
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JuanMoore's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Old Pueblo
Posts: 17,170
Liked 3253 Times on 3153 Posts
Likes Given: 20

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SumnerH View Post
Hmm. I'd say almost no German, Czech, or Belgian styles can sub either of those yeasts (heck, 95% of German styles are either lagers or hefes)--that's a pretty huge chunk of the styles out there. And lagers are certainly the most commonly consumed beers in the world.

I'd say less than half of my brewing could sub US-05 or S-04 pretty well. In reality, I use it more like a third of the time. It's beautifully easy to work with, though, and I always keep it around for emergencies or spontaneous brew days.
I get your point, and I agree, but there are a lot more dry yeasts available than just S-04 and S-05, and the variety of dry yeast strains is improving all the time. I think it's now possible to successfully brew most beers with dry yeast, including many German and Belgian styles.

While Safbrew T-58 isn't my favorite of the belgian strains that I've used, it produces classic belgian flavors, and can make a great belgian beer. Safbrew WB-06 has low flocculation and produces lots of banana and clove flavors for a great classic hefeweizen or dunkelwiezen. The Weihenstaphaner 34/70 strain is IMHO among the best yeasts for lagers and pilsners, and it's availble in dry form now too.

I still don't get why people buy WLP001 or Wyeast 1056. Safale S-05 is virtually the same strain, has twice as many cells per package, costs half as much, and has a much longer shelf life.
__________________
JuanMoore is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-09-2010, 09:38 PM   #10
TexMexBrew
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 4
Default

When I first started brewing, dry yeast was recommended to me due to the ease of use and the cost effectiveness of it. I have never had any problems with it and my brews have turned out quite nicely. Rehydrating it is debatable as I have been able to use it both ways, rehydrating and pitching it straight into my brew. My only experience with liquid yeast did not turn out well and due to the cost, I decided I would just stick with dry yeast. Though I may try it again later on.

__________________
TexMexBrew is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply



Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Liquid Starter for Liquid Yeast the_merlin Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 4 10-01-2010 10:14 PM
Mixing dry yeast with liquid yeast starter, ok or no? Reelale Fermentation & Yeast 6 04-29-2010 02:58 PM
Liquid Yeast--Do Kits in Sequence or Split Yeast Pack? osagedr Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 10 02-27-2010 03:24 PM
Kit comes with liquid yeast, first time brewer I think I want dry. Which dry yeast? rival178 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 12 10-22-2009 03:10 AM
Do commercial breweries use dry yeast or liquid yeast? fat x nub Commercial Brew Discussion 5 08-01-2008 03:52 PM



Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS