New Giveaway - Wort Monster Conical Fermenter!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > Do I have to use a starter?




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2013, 04:28 PM   #1
BrewBear76
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 16
Default Do I have to use a starter?

So I'm going to try and use liquid smack packs for the first time and wanted to know if it is really necessary to use a starter to obtain the proper cel count. I'm looking to pitch 18 M into my 1.083 OG wort and since each smack pack is noted as producing 6 M can't I just add 3 smack packs equaling 18 M instead of taking the time with the starter? I know that the yeast starter is cheaper but my problem is time not money. All advice appreciated.



__________________
BrewBear76 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-17-2013, 04:59 PM   #2
pdxal
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 849
Liked 62 Times on 58 Posts
Likes Given: 99

Default

Yes, you can just pitch multiple packs of yeast if you want. Make sure they are fresher/more viable to have the numbers you have found you need (not sure about 6M, for example, Wyeast purports to have 100 million cells, perhaps you are meaning to refer to #million/degree plato/ml wort?). Without looking at a calculator 3 smack packs sounds ballpark for 1.083 if they are fresh.
Starters give you the benefit of greater numbers of yeast, but also viability and vitality being enhanced.
However you choose, it will still be beer. Worst that can happen is it doesn't turn out exactly like you intended.

__________________
pdxal is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-17-2013, 05:07 PM   #3
jdauria
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jdauria's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Braintree, Massachusetts
Posts: 383
Liked 18 Times on 17 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

Yes, you could just use 3 packs, but consider this:

According to MrMalty.com a 1.083 OG 5 gallon batch of ale, needs 283 billion cells. So yes, without a starter, you could pitch 3 (actually 2.9 per the site), but with a starter with stir place, you only need 1 pack.

However, you also have to factor in the age of the yeast. Above numbers are with yeast packaged today. If the date on the smack pack was say 4 months old, you would need 12.9 smack packs without a starter vs 4 with...so cost could factor in. And just FYI, if you use White Lab vials instead, the date on the vial is "best by", the actual date is four months earlier.

Saying all that, I did start myself by just using X number of smack packs, but have since moved to a stir plate starter. I find that not only does fermentation start quicker with a starter, it also finishes much quicker also. I also find that I am getting a cleaner, better attenuated final product.

__________________

We are Boston Strong!

Primary - Empty
Secondary - Empty
Kegged - Heady or Not Here I Come (Heady Topper clone).
Bottled - California Common (2nd place, 2014 OSHC).

jdauria is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Starter or No Starter with Large Amount of Washed Yeast jww9618 Fermentation & Yeast 14 02-24-2014 03:56 PM
wlp838 starter activity? first lager starter... haeffnkr Fermentation & Yeast 6 07-10-2012 05:15 PM
Starter question, how long is a starter good to pitch johnheather125 Fermentation & Yeast 4 03-14-2012 10:50 PM
Quick question regaridng starter from starter newbie jmkratt Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 8 04-08-2011 09:34 PM
Steping up a starter to avoid making a giant sized starter. maida7 Fermentation & Yeast 8 03-31-2010 12:33 PM