 |
|
03-02-2011, 08:43 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: cowpens, s.c.
Posts: 9
|
4 weeks in primary?
|
|
Due to circumstances beyond my control, I had to leave an amber ale in
the primary for 4 weeks. Is this going to be a problem? Thanks.
|
|
|
03-02-2011, 08:47 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: OKC
Posts: 1,238
Liked 49 Times on 44 Posts Likes Given: 222
|
For some 4 weeks is the minimum / norm.
|
|
|
03-02-2011, 08:48 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: cowpens, s.c.
Posts: 9
|
Thanks. This is just my second brew. Still learning.
|
|
|
03-02-2011, 09:02 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Grand Forks, ND, USA
Posts: 517
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
Oh, don't worry about it. Other than being unsanitary*, it's actually hard to truly screw up a beer.
*Even then, sometimes the germs don't take over. I'm not advocating unsanitary practices, I'm just sayin' it happens. 
|
|
|
03-02-2011, 09:04 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Osceola, Iowa
Posts: 1,419
Liked 20 Times on 17 Posts Likes Given: 6
|
4 weeks is the norm for me.
|
|
|
03-02-2011, 09:26 PM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 323
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
Four weeks... that's my norm. 30 days then to bottling/kegging.
__________________
~ BIAB : All Grain Made Easy ; Mash, Sparge, Boil all in the same Kettle ~ all you need is a bag and a hook!
|
|
|
03-03-2011, 04:08 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Indian Mills, NJ
Posts: 267
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
|
I have done lagers that I left on the yeast for 4-5 months. Not the best protocol but the beers did not suffer at all.
|
|
|
03-03-2011, 04:12 PM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: conway SC., South Carolina
Posts: 1,924
Liked 19 Times on 19 Posts Likes Given: 6
|
many people on this site have switched to longer primarys and not using secondary at all. i've been doing it this way and my beers have been great so far
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrk00k
I'm getting ingredients in the mail today, and I can't even taste my beer yet. What should I do?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsweet
I would make a yeast starter, and pitch it into your mailbox.
|
|
|
|
03-03-2011, 04:18 PM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,374
Liked 59 Times on 49 Posts Likes Given: 19
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teacher
Oh, don't worry about it. Other than being unsanitary*, it's actually hard to truly screw up a beer.
*Even then, sometimes the germs don't take over. I'm not advocating unsanitary practices, I'm just sayin' it happens. 
|
I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not, but it's not 'unsanitary' in any way, provided you did a good job keeping things sanitized when you put it in and haven't opened the lid...
|
|
|
03-03-2011, 05:12 PM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: conway SC., South Carolina
Posts: 1,924
Liked 19 Times on 19 Posts Likes Given: 6
|
im pretty sure he meant that being unsanitary was one of the only ways to screw up a beer. not that long primary was unsanitary
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrk00k
I'm getting ingredients in the mail today, and I can't even taste my beer yet. What should I do?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsweet
I would make a yeast starter, and pitch it into your mailbox.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|