 |
|
12-03-2012, 06:32 PM
|
#731
|
|
Moderator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,510
Liked 523 Times on 376 Posts Likes Given: 1253
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beervangelist
I'm not sure what all the excitement is about. Politics is not an ingredient in beer.
|
I think its remarkable that, in a person's lifetime, we have gone from prohibition to the White House Chefs making homemade beer. I call that progress (and exciting).
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 06:56 PM
|
#732
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 636
Liked 101 Times on 77 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pappers_
I think its remarkable that, in a person's lifetime, we have gone from prohibition to the White House Chefs making homemade beer. I call that progress (and exciting).
|
Yup, not much more to it than that. Plus, it's cool to brew the same beer as someone famous, politician or no. If you found out Sir Sean Connery brewed his own wee heavy, are you telling me you wouldn't be interested in trying out his recipe? Or if historians unearthed the Wright bros' secret family recipe for Windy Day Porter*? I don't think it says much about peoples' politics that they're interested, just that they're interested in beer.
Cheers
*As far as I'm aware, this doesn't exist.
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 07:52 PM
|
#733
|
|
Swollen Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 2,502
Liked 251 Times on 209 Posts Likes Given: 107
|
slight variation on the above: the recipes have become a collective experience, as illustrated by the 74 pages of this thread (and numerous other threads, on this board and elsewhere). it's fin to think that people across this country (and likely around the world) are brewing these recipes. even non-brewers have asked me if i've brewed the white house beer, so word is getting out.
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 10:18 PM
|
#734
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 399
Liked 22 Times on 19 Posts Likes Given: 38
|
For as much press as it's gotten, oddly enough, the couple people I talked to in my homebrew club hadn't heard about it.
|
|
|
12-04-2012, 12:02 AM
|
#735
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Rochesterish
Posts: 253
Liked 30 Times on 14 Posts Likes Given: 269
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabills
yeah i know kinda sad isn't it. Beer is beer is beer, no added politics necessary.
|
:d 
__________________
Go Bills!
|
|
|
12-04-2012, 12:19 AM
|
#736
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: glendale, az
Posts: 247
Liked 25 Times on 20 Posts Likes Given: 56
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBills
:d 
|
Lol you smile at such a comment when you were like the first one to 'go there.' Wow hehe.... 
|
|
|
12-04-2012, 02:48 PM
|
#737
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Fiskdale, MA
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by breweringbeaz
I'm reading a lot of reviews regarding the whitehouse honey ale-- has anyone brewed or tried the honey porter?
|
Oh yes the honey porter was a huge hit at Thanksgiving. It needs time in the bottle. After 2 weeks of conditioning I detected a bitterness in the finish that has diminished with time. Thanksgiving, 5 weeks, was fine. Lovely chocolate notes though I couldn't detect much honey (added at 30 mins.).
The bitterness may have been my over-hopping. The recipe called for 3/4 ounce of hops. I said "what the heck" and put in my full ounce packet.
Will brew again.
|
|
|
12-08-2012, 03:11 AM
|
#738
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 344
Liked 38 Times on 33 Posts
|
After 3 weeks, I am calling my honey ale finished. It is very sweet with honey flavor, but not cloying. The finish is bitter, but it also brings the floral quality of the honey out in a pleasant way. This beer is rich, probably the most full bodied one I've brewed. I am glad I chose local wildflower honey as it really showcases the flavors from the honey. I will probably never use Windsor again as it is about impossible to keep out of the pour without leaving a considerable amount of beer in the bottle. Overall, I'm pretty happy with this brew.
|
|
|
12-08-2012, 02:02 PM
|
#739
|
|
Moderator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,510
Liked 523 Times on 376 Posts Likes Given: 1253
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edds5p0
. . .I will probably never use Windsor again as it is about impossible to keep out of the pour without leaving a considerable amount of beer in the bottle. . .
|
Glad you're enjoying the beer. Just wanted to add my two-cents that Windsor is generally a pretty good flocculater and my experience is that it forms a nice compact and stable cake. There are lots of variables, though, which could explain why my experience with Windsor is different than yours.
|
|
|
12-08-2012, 02:26 PM
|
#740
|
|
Stay Rude, Stay SHARP
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 3,582
Liked 410 Times on 317 Posts Likes Given: 116
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pappers_
Glad you're enjoying the beer. Just wanted to add my two-cents that Windsor is generally a pretty good flocculater and my experience is that it forms a nice compact and stable cake. There are lots of variables, though, which could explain why my experience with Windsor is different than yours.
|
I've used Windsor for this beer and this beer only, but i know other English yeasts (Wyeast West Yorkshire comes to mind) that are normally great flocculaters sometimes refuse to drop out
__________________
Up Next: Saison, Tripel
Primary: Accidental Lambic
Secondary: Chili Pepper Smoked Porter(s)
Bottled: Brett B. Tripel, Dubbel, Robust Porter, Black IPA, Cal Common, Chinook/Vienna SMaSH, Kolsch, APA, ESB, Oatmeal Stout, Tafelbier
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|