Get your HBT Growlers, Shirts and Membership before the Rush!


Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Beer Discussion > No success with Whirlfloc....
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-22-2012, 03:51 AM   #1
Rev2010
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Bayonne, NJ
Posts: 1,984
Liked 116 Times on 83 Posts
Likes Given: 380

Default No success with Whirlfloc....

I've tried whirlfoc a few times and had stopped using it because I never saw any difference. I had even brewed the same beer with and without whirlfoc and didn't see any difference as well. Recently I did an English Ale, something like Fuller's London Pride, and decided to try it once more. But yet again I have chill haze and even the highly flocculant Wyeast 1968 is making its way into the glass which usually isn't a problem. This is also after the beer has been in the fridge for several days. I do a nice rolling boil and I chill quickly, typically within 11 minutes and in winter as fast as 8 minutes. What could be the reasons I'm seeing not the slightest bit of difference between using whirlfloc or not? I've also done 5 minute end of boil additions lately. I used to do 15 but read many say the actual manufacturer says 5, but there's been no change. Oh, and my mash pH is typically 5.4-5.6.


Rev.

__________________
Rev2010 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-22-2012, 03:54 AM   #2
Skeptidelphian
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Fairmount, Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 225
Liked 53 Times on 36 Posts
Likes Given: 118

Default

What are you doing in transferring your wort from your kettle to fermenter?

I use whirlfloc, then after cooling get a good whirlpool going (helps with aeration as well) and let it sit for 15 minutes. Then I siphon from the kettle into the fermenter, leaving the coalesced trub behind. Remember that's what the whirlfloc is going to do - grab onto proteins and sink them to the bottom.

__________________
Quaker City Brewing Co.
Primary: Empty
Aging: Empty
Conditioning: Nothing
On Tap: Brewerytown Bitter
In the Works: Poplar St. Pale Ale, Boathouse Brown Ale, Philadelphia Porter
Skeptidelphian is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-22-2012, 04:24 AM   #3
Rev2010
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Bayonne, NJ
Posts: 1,984
Liked 116 Times on 83 Posts
Likes Given: 380

Default

I only whirlpool with the immersion chiller. I then drain from my Blichmann kettle into my fermenter using a strainer to remove trub. Interestingly, with this English Ale I took note that nearly everything in the kettle went into the fermenter. I literally had almost no trub in the kettle. But, other times times I had left over trub in the kettle and it was no different.


Rev.

__________________
Rev2010 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-22-2012, 02:13 PM   #4
brew2enjoy
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Delaware
Posts: 944
Liked 37 Times on 32 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Whirlfloc works great for me. When using my wort chiller I can see the break material separating itself and sinking to the bottom. I currently still dump the entire kettle into the fermenter, but all the break still sinks to the bottom in a few hours.

__________________
DIY stuff...
- Bar
- S/S mash paddle, PEX manifold
brew2enjoy is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply



Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Too much whirlfloc? McGlothan Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 6 03-03-2012 06:51 AM
way too much whirlfloc beerhound28 General Beer Discussion 4 01-31-2012 02:22 PM
Yay! for whirlfloc! Soldevi Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 8 01-23-2012 03:31 AM
To WhirlFloc or Not to WhirlFloc MarzBock Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 8 01-13-2011 03:04 PM
Whirlfloc DtownRiot Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 8 01-06-2009 07:33 PM



Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS