HBT 2014 Big Giveaway - 4/10 Re-Draw Winners Posted!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Beer Discussion > I'm bringing back the "Is secondary necessary?" argument




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-17-2011, 03:04 PM   #1
Zixxer10R
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Haslet, Texas
Posts: 525
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default I'm bringing back the "Is secondary necessary?" argument

This weekend i had a nice conversation with my LHBS owner about how i wasn't secondary-ing any longer just because i had been convinced on this forum that most people aren't using this step any longer.

My LHBS owner convinced me to continue using this step because of a few reasons, but cheif among them was the fact that the simple science behind moving your beer off of the spent yeast will yield better beer. I mean, if you started eating your own waste, the final "out"come ( ) wouldn't be pretty either.

I realize that i'll get flamed almost immediately, but i'm gonna say this anyway. At least in the beginning of the "no secondary" trend, the primary reason for the trend beginning was because people are lazy and didn't feel like taking a few minutes to rack the beer off the trub layer.

There, i said it. Let the flaming begin.



__________________
Diablo Pass Brewing Co.
Zixxer10R is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-17-2011, 03:11 PM   #2
Germelli1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Blacksburg/Herndon, VA
Posts: 2,194
Liked 33 Times on 33 Posts
Likes Given: 19

Default

It sounds like you LHBS owner is stuck with the outdated information that has been covered here probably 500 times. I am not trying to flame but I figured someone starting a thread like this would have at least a little bit of decent information rather than what some dude said who clearly has little knowledge of the science behind yeast.



__________________

If I had 8 hours to chop down a tree, I would spend 6 sharpening my axe. ~Abe Lincoln

Germelli1 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-17-2011, 03:12 PM   #3
Revvy
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Revvy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: "Detroitish" Michigan
Posts: 40,774
Liked 2657 Times on 1602 Posts
Likes Given: 3444

Default



3-5 threads a day about this aren't enough for you?

Just read this. Every debate, discussion, scientific reason, argument, reargument, re-discussion, re-debate, and every guestion has been done ad nauseum in that thread, and about a thousand others, but that one seems to be the best.

Heck, just print it out and hand it to him. Or just let him believe what he believe, and believe what you believe.

Do you really feel the need to re-invent the wheel for the 30 millionth time? We've been talking about it for 4 years on here. There's plenty of information on here already without rehashing the same useless arguments over and over.
__________________

Like my snazzy new avatar? Get Sons of Zymurgy swag, here, and brew with the best.

Revvy's one of the cool reverends. He has a Harley and a t-shirt that says on the back "If you can read this, the bitch was Raptured. - Madman

I gotta tell ya, just between us girls, that Revvy is HOT. Very tall, gorgeous grey hair and a terrific smile. He's very good looking in person, with a charismatic personality... he drives like a ****ing maniac! - YooperBrew

Revvy is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-17-2011, 03:12 PM   #4
Airborneguy
Adjunct of the Law
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Airborneguy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Isle of Staten
Posts: 10,838
Liked 832 Times on 618 Posts
Likes Given: 1099

Default

If you feel the need, then do it. I never understood arguing about what other people do with their beer. Who cares?

__________________
Fermentor(s):
Lagering:
Bottled: Atonement Brown Porter
Airborneguy is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-17-2011, 03:13 PM   #5
smalliewader
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruffs Dale, PA
Posts: 371
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

I have tried the whole longer primary thing and honestly, I tend to like my beers better that I secondary. I think they taste a little more "cleaner" when I secondary. I figure there's still yeast going to the secondary to do clean up duty. I know guys are making great beer without them, but to each his own. I personally like to secondary.

__________________
smalliewader is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-17-2011, 03:14 PM   #6
Homercidal
Moderator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Homercidal's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Reed City, MI
Posts: 22,065
Liked 1650 Times on 1197 Posts
Likes Given: 940

Default

Your LHBS is a moron!

Yeah, I suck at flaming.

Actually, I would not want to leave my beer on the yeast past the point where it will create a negative situation either. He is right in saying that the yeast will die and cause bad flavors. I think nearly everyone will agree that a certain amount of dead yeast will make your beer taste bad.

Here is what I know to be true: I have left my beer on the yeast in the primary for up to 3 months to no ill effect.

I do not have equipment that allows me to do measurements, but I believe a few things to be true: You are eating yeast excrement in every batch. I don't believe that the yeast will necessarily create a bad flavor out of the metabolism of dead yeast product. In fact, I think that they very likely turn some of that stuff into other, more beneificial products.

It's just as likely that not having living yeast to help clean up will result in the dead yeast contributing MORE bad flavors, since those dead yeast cells will just continue to contribute their rottenness with no option of changing it into anything else.

In the interest of keeping this short, I think that yeast can live many more weeks than previously thought, and as long as they do, they will not only perform conditioning of the beer, but conditioning of their former selves. And all the while, your beer is clearing and the yeast cake compacting.

I would not like to go past, say 3 months, because at some point you WILL get some nasties. I just don't think it's going to be in the 3-6 weeks or so that I usually primary my beers for.

For long term aging, I'll secondary into a carboy and top with CO2.

__________________
Homercidal is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-17-2011, 03:17 PM   #7
bruin_ale
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 1,435
Liked 15 Times on 15 Posts

Default

I've been mightily underwhelmed by LHBS owners' knowledge these days.
The "eating your own waste" argument makes no sense. The waste - or byproducts of fermentation are EXACTLY what we want the yeast there to work on longer. The point at which they start eating themselves is what we want to prevent (autolysis). Many here, myself included, have left beers in primary for a couple months without detectable flavors from autolysis. If you want to bring back this argument, you should do a 10 gallon batch, split it into two and do one with secondary and one without. Then blind taste test and see which is the better beer. That certainly won't "put it to rest", but it might help you decide if you think it makes a difference.

__________________
San Jose Homebrew Club - The Grain Trust
bruin_ale is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-17-2011, 03:21 PM   #8
PVH
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 572
Liked 12 Times on 12 Posts

Default

I like to secondary to remove the ethanol waste produced by the yeast.

__________________
PVH is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-17-2011, 03:32 PM   #9
scottland
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 2,117
Liked 131 Times on 103 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

Quote:
I've been mightily underwhelmed by LHBS owners' knowledge these days.
I have nothing else to add.
__________________
scottland is offline
iahebert Likes This 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-17-2011, 03:56 PM   #10
bwomp313
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 1,189
Liked 25 Times on 18 Posts
Likes Given: 28

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zixxer10R View Post
I mean, if you started eating your own waste, the final "out"come ( ) wouldn't be pretty either.
Yeast poop and human poop are not the same thing. Yeast poop is delicious. Human poop; not so much.


__________________
bwomp313 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Brew House" vs "Actual Mash" Efficiency huntsman General Beer Discussion 5 12-07-2013 08:58 AM
Woof...HUGE difference with "fresh" vs "not-so-fresh" commercial brew scrambledegg81 General Beer Discussion 15 08-20-2011 01:25 PM
Cost of "good" beer, versus "swill". TwoWheeler General Beer Discussion 26 07-14-2011 01:39 PM
"Appetizer" vs. "full-meal" beers..? beergears General Beer Discussion 5 06-04-2010 11:39 PM
"Floaters" left even after secondary??? zanemoseley General Beer Discussion 2 03-12-2009 03:01 PM