Get your HBT Growlers, Shirts and Membership before the Rush!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Beer Discussion > "Heavy" Beers, drinkability, etc.
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-19-2009, 05:57 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 48
Default "Heavy" Beers, drinkability, etc.

Well we all know that bigger beers means a high gravity. But when a lot of people refer to "heavy" beers, what they mean is that they could only drink two or three. Most regular people will say they like Guiness, but it's like drinking a meal, and they could at most drink a couple. When we know it's actually more on the lighter side.

Obviously there's a difference in thickness when comparing say a big RIS to a Bud Light. The RIS is thick, the Bud is watery. I think more of reason to say the beer is "heavy" and to only drink two or three would be because of the alcohol content - not that it would fill you up more.

When we get right down to it, isn't 16 oz of liquid still 16 oz of liquid regardless of style? To me, I don't think I get filled up any more with a big RIS than a light beer.

Are there any facts behind "drinkability?" Can 16 oz of RIS fill you up more than 16 oz of Bud Light?

TheCapn22 is offline
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-19-2009, 06:07 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 179
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts


Agreed about the Guinness - thinking that it's heavy is purely psychological. However, comparing 16 oz of RIS vs. 16 oz of Bud Lite, the RIS has many more calories, which will definitely affect how satiated you feel. Think about the limiting case - just a tiny step beyond Bud Lite - a 16 oz glass of water...

Dos_Locos_Brewery is offline
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-19-2009, 06:08 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 4,567
Liked 41 Times on 38 Posts


They had a great article in the last Zymurgy about session beers and drinkability. Believe it or not, that term has been used long before the Bud marketing people started using it.

I'm not too sure about how much they actually fill you up. I think FG and leftover dextrins might have a lot to do with it. Compare a 9% RIS and a 9% Tripel. The RIS will have a higher FG, which translates to a "thicker" beer. It also has stronger flavors The tripel will be drier and have a less complex flavor palette.

As far as drinkability goes, most people would concur that in this example, the Tripel would win. Like I said, I don't really know if one would "fill you up" more than the other.

In my mind, the key to drinkability is balance, low alcohol, relatively drier, and a lack of any strong flavors. Not that a good session beer can't be flavorful. Maybe thats why some would consider Guiness a "heavy beer". For a Bud drinker, the flavors of Guiness are a LOT stronger than what they are used to.

Edcculus is offline
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-19-2009, 07:18 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 698
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts


Look at it in terms of calories, your brain can trigger a full sated feeling by sensing the calories consumed or it can sense you just being full of water and still hungry. Four glasses of milk will hold you over for a while, four glasses of water make you pee a lot and leave you still wanting something with some substance.(calories) So, malty english beer types will fill you better than bud55 or mgd64. That's my take on heavy.



Due to recent economic crisis, stock market crash, budget cuts, and the rising cost of everything including taxes: "The Light at the End of The Tunnel" has been turned off.
beerocd is offline
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-19-2009, 08:34 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: QCA, Iowa
Posts: 959
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts


For me, it's more about richness than volume. Drinking 3-4 RISs or DIPAs in a row would just overwhelm me, not because I'm full or drunk, but just because of the shear amount of flavor.

Scimmia is offline
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-19-2009, 08:40 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
mmb's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 24,966
Liked 3207 Times on 3109 Posts
Likes Given: 181


All I know is I can pound pints of Guinness just as easy as any bitter or lager.

Some days I'd rather hit the black stuff as well.

White Dog Aleworks and Drafthouse
mmb is offline
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-19-2009, 08:45 PM   #7
Hobby Collector
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
IrregularPulse's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 43,842
Liked 2814 Times on 2759 Posts
Likes Given: 124


I agree, Drinkability gets a bad wrap by beer snobs because of Bud. But it is a legit term used to describe beer. it's about the desire to keep drinking. Like said, a RIS is great for maybe a Pint or two, but it's too rich to drink all night. That would mean it's drinkability is not that of a Mild or Scottish 60/ fore example.

For heavy I think "chewy". Doesn't get heavier in my book then an Oatmeal Stout on Beergas

Tap Room Hobo

I should have stuck to four fingers in Vegas. :o - marubozo
IrregularPulse is offline
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Quick Reply
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"5 Beers in 1 Huge Glass" idiots in advertising madewithchicken General Beer Discussion 32 08-16-2011 12:52 AM
Just started making some "Big Beers"... questions about pitching yeast and o2 h4rdluck Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 7 03-25-2011 03:28 AM
"This beer doesn't fit a style"- crazy beers SkinnyShamrock General Beer Discussion 22 06-04-2009 10:53 PM
"designing great beers", second edition? mikfire General Beer Discussion 2 05-31-2009 04:53 PM
my "****in Heavy Ale" - carbonation question BADS197 Extract Brewing 7 12-30-2008 07:22 PM

Newest Threads