 |
10-21-2008, 02:15 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hanahan, SC (North Charleston)
Posts: 535
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
|
Boil time - 60 vs 90 ?
|
|
I've searched a bit and looked at "How to Brew" and The Complete Joy of Homebrewing? and can't find any information on boil times.
I'm curios as to what is going on that makes you want a longer boil on say an IPA vs a Pale Ale (90 vs 60 minutes). It seems you don't gain much with hop utilization beyond 60 minutes. The IPA I did didn't call for adding hops until the 60 minute remaining mark anyway. I'm guessing it has something to do with higher gravity beers.
Laymen terms would be better for me... 
__________________
On Tap - Pale Ale, Centiennal Blonde
Primary - Dry Irish Stout, Dead Guy Ale, Mild Mannered Ale
Crash Chilling -
|
|
|
10-21-2008, 02:17 PM
|
#2
|
|
Frau Administrator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upper Michigan
Posts: 51,707
Liked 1967 Times on 1509 Posts Likes Given: 89
|
There are three reasons I use a longer boil- one is if I'm making a "bigger" beer and want to boil it down more. If I want a more carmelized wort, I've boiled longer. The other is if I use pilsner malt in the mash. Pilsner malt is notorious for producing DMS, so a longer boil is advised to boil off as much DMS as possible.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006
|
|
|
10-21-2008, 09:45 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 127
|
IMHO, a 90 minute boil is only necessary when using Pilsner malt, as Yooper has stated. I rarely use it however, and in all my brews with regular two-row I only boil for 60 minutes. Haven't had DMS issues yet.
__________________
Primary: Rye Pale
Secondary: Belgian Thing, Brewhouse Winterfest
Bottled: Sorachi Slam, Massive RyePA, Dad's Porter, Roasted Steam, Kolsch, Rowecastle Brown, Winter Wit, Double Chocolate Oatmeal Stout
Here's a plug for my boss. Check Brewery Lane out if you live in Atlantic Canada.
|
|
|
10-21-2008, 09:54 PM
|
#4
|
|
In yo' garage, steelin' yo parts.
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oblivion
Posts: 43,970
Liked 3815 Times on 3659 Posts Likes Given: 47
|
I use a 90 minute boil to help with break formation and removal.
That is for the first 15, I skim the break as it foams on the surface without the risk of losing any hop material (except if I FWH). Prolly a twitchy practice but it works for me and my beers became clearer as a result without the need for kettle or cold finings.
At 60, I pitch for bittering and let it go from there.
|
|
|
10-21-2008, 10:35 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 257
|
I always do 90 min boils. I like to be on the safe side with DMS, and I like higher gravity beers. Also it gives me 30 min to scramble around thinking about what to do next :-D
__________________
My semi-regularly updated beer blog: PremiumBitter
PRIMARY 1: Baltic Porter | WLP001
PRIMARY 2: Chocolate-Spearmint Winter Warmer | WLP028
SECONDARY: Spokane Falls Fresh Hop Ale (IPA) | WLP001/WLP028 (Amarillo/Columbus dry hop)
KEGS:
Liberator Doppelbock
Yellow Marmot Ale (Golden Ale) | WLP001
Yellow Marmot Ale (Golden Ale) | WLP028
UPCOMING: Premium Bitter, Imperial Steam Beer, Strong Scotch Ale, Munich Helles, Schwartz Bier, Rauch Bier
|
|
|
10-22-2008, 12:23 AM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 404
Liked 13 Times on 7 Posts
|
I seem to get better results with longer, more vigorous boils. I wait for the hot break then start the timer. 30min after the break I add my bitter hops and go 60 min from there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GilaMinumBeer
That is for the first 15, I skim the break as it foams on the surface without the risk of losing any hop material (except if I FWH). Prolly a twitchy practice but it works for me and my beers became clearer as a result without the need for kettle or cold finings.
|
I'd like to hear more about this practice. you actually remove the foam?
|
|
|
10-22-2008, 12:34 AM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bryan, Texas
Posts: 2,404
Liked 22 Times on 17 Posts Likes Given: 3
|
As far as hops utilization goes, you get a slight increase in a 90 minute boil, but by the time you add in your time and fuel, I don't think you are gaining anything. However, as mentioned above, a 90 minute boil is very useful when using pilsner malt (to ensure DMS removal) or other very light beers. IMHO when I use a 90 minute boil on lighter beers it seems much "crisper" than when I use a 60 minute boil.
As a personal rule of thumb, if I am making a really light, dry, crisp beer, I use a 90 minute low-temp mash and a 90 minute boil. Otherwise I stick with the good 'ole 60 minute boil + whatever mash profile for the style I want to do.
Hope this helps! 
|
|
|
10-22-2008, 12:36 AM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,106
Liked 9 Times on 9 Posts
|
I agree with the 90 minute boil for Pilsen based beers. That said, normally after I finish draining my mash I go and clean my mash tun and ready some other things for the rest of the brew day, occasionally checking my keggle. I'd say I probably average a 75 minute boil for non-pilsen based beers.
__________________
Primary: Cherrywood Smoked Porter
60 Minute IPA
Secondary:
On tap:Amber Ale
Milk Stout
Lagering:
http://www.lazydogbrewery.com
|
|
|
10-22-2008, 01:06 AM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Williamstown, MA
Posts: 425
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by enohcs
I'd like to hear more about this practice. you actually remove the foam?
|
Gila will have to answer for Gila, but I sure do. It's gone and separated itself out, I help the process along by removing it. Doesn't amount to much loss of wort, done correctly.
__________________
Re-filling the pipeline - got a lot of brewing to do.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|