 |
|
11-26-2008, 07:10 PM
|
#31
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 238
|
Bookmark'd.
|
|
|
11-27-2008, 11:20 PM
|
#32
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 2,280
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts
|
PseudoChef - Nice write up and thank you for making a very sound argument.
Personally I prefer to use honey, I don't know if I can actually taste any difference but it must be an subconscious thing. Even then I try not to go over 10% of the fermentables just because I like rich and full beers.
__________________
---
In Primary: Belgium Chimay clones.
In Secondary: Braggot, pale ale, end of the world white.
Conditioning: Mead, Cider, braggot, Belgium Wheat.
On Tap: Clones, Chimay Blue, Red, Porter, malted cider.
Bottles: Far, far, too many to list.
|
|
|
11-28-2008, 12:01 AM
|
#33
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: St. George Utah
Posts: 3,945
Liked 28 Times on 27 Posts Likes Given: 41
|
I had some awful of flavors to a can+kilo kit I did fifteen years ago. I think I doubled the sugar. The next can kit I did I used DME (even for primming) and it was much better. Life got in the way and I just recently started to brew again.
I have no problems with using sugar but it needs to have a purpose in the recipe.
|
|
|
11-28-2008, 12:20 AM
|
#34
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Grand Forks, ND, USA
Posts: 517
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
Count me among the pro-sugar crowd. My favorite beer is a RyePA with .75 lb sugar and Notty's, which results in a nice dry beer to allow the rye and hop flavors to shine...and absolutely no cidery flavors. I've used up to 1.25-1.5 lbs (not sure) with no problems. I'm about to brew a bastardized Belgian Golden (I'm gonna use a little pale malt to increase the body a little) using 2 pounds and am sure it will be great.
|
|
|
11-28-2008, 01:12 AM
|
#35
|
|
Registered User
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: jersey
Posts: 1,008
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts
|
thank you, finally some support for sugar. I tried arguing this a few months ago and every1 was against it
|
|
|
11-29-2008, 01:52 AM
|
#36
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bridgewater, NJ
Posts: 822
Liked 13 Times on 8 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PseudoChef
All right, I'm tired of people saying that adding some type of sugar (be it cane, corn, whatever) is going to make it taste like Cider. I would even bet that most people have never tried doing this and are just hopping on this anti-sugar bandwagon because it's the "in" thing to do.
|
Well, duh... It's a homebrewing forum. Making up random crap and arguing about it is really our main hobby. Homebrewing is just an offshoot. 
|
|
|
11-29-2008, 01:21 PM
|
#37
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 3,714
Liked 79 Times on 59 Posts Likes Given: 8
|
Sugar can be quite appropriate. Fuller's London Pride, for example, uses sugar, along with many well-regarded real ales.
Cheers,
Bob
|
|
|
11-29-2008, 03:10 PM
|
#38
|
|
Swing the BIG hammer
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,445
Liked 21 Times on 18 Posts Likes Given: 17
|
Yea for sugar! Lets all brew a batch with nothing but sugar and yeast! Just kidding, but after reading this thread it does give me enough data to at leased investigate the reasons for using sugar. The only sugar I've ever used was dark brown sugar in my nut brown ale recipe. It's added a bit more taste and obviously a bump in ABV. I've brewed a batch without the brown sugar because I wanted to see what it would taste like without it. I was surprised to find that it was not as "thin" and when it came to the taste there was barely a noticeable difference. here's the recipe:
Ingredients:
------------
Amount Item Type % or IBU
13.00 lb Pale Malt (2 Row) US (2.0 SRM) Grain 71.23 %
1.50 lb Cara-Pils/Dextrine (2.0 SRM) Grain 8.22 %
1.00 lb Chocolate Malt (350.0 SRM) Grain 5.48 %
0.50 lb Victory Malt (25.0 SRM) Grain 2.74 %
0.25 lb Special B Malt (180.0 SRM) Grain 1.37 %
2.00 oz Williamette [5.50 %] (60 min) Hops 18.7 IBU
1.00 oz Fuggles [4.50 %] (20 min) Hops 4.6 IBU
1.00 oz Fuggles [4.50 %] (3 min) Hops 1.0 IBU
2.00 lb Brown Sugar, Dark (50.0 SRM) Sugar 10.96 %
1 Pkgs Edinburgh Ale (White Labs #WLP028) Yeast-Ale
2 Pkgs Nottingham (Danstar #-) Yeast-Ale
I've also substituted the sugar for honey pound for pound. It's had similar but noticeable results. But, I'll get to the point or rather my question:
Outside of a recipe that looks for a certain result albeit flavor, color, or the obligatory bump in ABV, why would you use sugar when you can get the same results with the proper blend of malt?
__________________
North Saint Paul Brewshack
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmendez29
Mom was right. Never argue with an idiot. They just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Where's my beer. I know I left it around here somewhere.....
|
Kegged/Drinking:Nihilistic Integrity - Black IPA, #1 BIAB pale ale, Bells Two Hearted - yes a keg of the real stuff
Kegged/Conditioning:Wally N Seans Braggot, Emerald Eyes - Irish Red, Atomic Tsunami - brown
Primary:empty
|
|
|
11-29-2008, 03:25 PM
|
#39
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 2,430
Liked 19 Times on 18 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seabee John
Yea for sugar! Lets all brew a batch with nothing but sugar and yeast! Just kidding, but after reading this thread it does give me enough data to at leased investigate the reasons for using sugar. The only sugar I've ever used was dark brown sugar in my nut brown ale recipe. It's added a bit more taste and obviously a bump in ABV. I've brewed a batch without the brown sugar because I wanted to see what it would taste like without it. I was surprised to find that it was not as "thin" and when it came to the taste there was barely a noticeable difference. here's the recipe:
Ingredients:
------------
Amount Item Type % or IBU
13.00 lb Pale Malt (2 Row) US (2.0 SRM) Grain 71.23 %
1.50 lb Cara-Pils/Dextrine (2.0 SRM) Grain 8.22 %
1.00 lb Chocolate Malt (350.0 SRM) Grain 5.48 %
0.50 lb Victory Malt (25.0 SRM) Grain 2.74 %
0.25 lb Special B Malt (180.0 SRM) Grain 1.37 %
2.00 oz Williamette [5.50 %] (60 min) Hops 18.7 IBU
1.00 oz Fuggles [4.50 %] (20 min) Hops 4.6 IBU
1.00 oz Fuggles [4.50 %] (3 min) Hops 1.0 IBU
2.00 lb Brown Sugar, Dark (50.0 SRM) Sugar 10.96 %
1 Pkgs Edinburgh Ale (White Labs #WLP028) Yeast-Ale
2 Pkgs Nottingham (Danstar #-) Yeast-Ale
I've also substituted the sugar for honey pound for pound. It's had similar but noticeable results. But, I'll get to the point or rather my question:
Outside of a recipe that looks for a certain result albeit flavor, color, or the obligatory bump in ABV, why would you use sugar when you can get the same results with the proper blend of malt?
|
Holy Schnikes! That's a big brown beer! Prolly the biggest ever. Oh wait, is that for a 10Gal batch? I notice a lot of Chocolate malt in this beer. What's the SRM turn out to be? I'll bet its got preternatural head retention though.
I'm brewing a English brown next weekend so I'm exploring my options.
__________________
On Tap: 1. Kelly R. IPA, 2. Roter Hund Hefeweizen, 3. Bud Killer Blonde, 4. Red Dog Pale, 5. Roter Hund Oktoberfest, 6. Pumpkin Ale, 7. McRed's Stout (with new nitro system and stout tap,) Cream Soda, 8. ESB # 3, & 9. Ordinary Bitter.
|
|
|
11-29-2008, 09:43 PM
|
#40
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 2,280
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrNate
Well, duh... It's a homebrewing forum. Making up random crap and arguing about it is really our main hobby. Homebrewing is just an offshoot. 
|
I strongly disagree and fully disapprove that this would ever happen here!
I think 90 percent of the statistics here are made up 50 percent of the time. 
__________________
---
In Primary: Belgium Chimay clones.
In Secondary: Braggot, pale ale, end of the world white.
Conditioning: Mead, Cider, braggot, Belgium Wheat.
On Tap: Clones, Chimay Blue, Red, Porter, malted cider.
Bottles: Far, far, too many to list.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|