 |
|
11-03-2008, 11:57 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Newington, CT
Posts: 127
|
90min vs. 60min boil
|
|
Anyone know the reason for doing a 90min boil over a 60min boil even if the first hop addition is at the 60min mark. I'm planing on doing this SNCA clone recipe by dude
http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f12/recipe-tomorrow-question-4788/#post43073
and he has it done for 90min. Just wondering. Also I plan on doing a partial mash version of this recipe if that changes anything.
__________________
Primary:
Secondary:
Kegged:
UpNext:
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 12:00 AM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lesotho
Posts: 4,772
|
When you do AG brewing sometimes you need the longer boil to get your wort down to the right size and OG since you start with a larger volume and lower gravity. The extra 30 min allows for some evaporation. You will be fine with a 60 min boil
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 12:07 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 849
|
For beers with pilsner or other undermodified malts, a 90 min. boil is said to be necessary to drive off DMS precursors. Some people do a 90 min. boil on all their beers because it gives them a cleaner taste. Also, the evaporation reason that someone mentioned.
I am skeptical of both of the above reasons to do a 90 min. boil. Basic Brewing Radio or Video interviewed someone a while ago who said that after some study, they found that a 45 min. boil is all that is necessary given a good rolling boil.
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 12:07 AM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,620
|
I boil 90mins with large grain bills, because I run off more wort. More grain, more sugars, more runoff, requires a longer boil to get the right volume and good eff.
If I do a 45 minute boil, or a 60 minute boil, I will either have a 6 gallon batch because of all my runoff, OR I will have to run off less and leave more sugars in the mash. I dont want to do either, so I do 90 min boils.
____________________________________
Primary- Orange Cascade APA
Secondary- AIR
Keg1- Centennial Blonde
Keg2- Oktoberfest
Keg3- Christmas Spice
Keg4- Fire In The Hole
Keg5- AIR
Keg6- AIR
Keg7- AIR
Keg8- AIR
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 12:31 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,281
|
You get better hop utilization by allowing the hot break to form before adding hops to the boil. I'm not advocating doing a 90 min boil all the time, but if you do a 90 min boil and add the first hops at 60 min, you'll get better hop utilization. The reason is that hot-break proteins coagulate with hop α-acids and drop them out of solution.
__________________
END TRANSMISSION
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 12:53 AM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Armpit of Dallas (Irving), TX
Posts: 2,213
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mew
For beers with pilsner or other undermodified malts, a 90 min. boil is said to be necessary to drive off DMS precursors. Some people do a 90 min. boil on all their beers because it gives them a cleaner taste. Also, the evaporation reason that someone mentioned.
I am skeptical of both of the above reasons to do a 90 min. boil. Basic Brewing Radio or Video interviewed someone a while ago who said that after some study, they found that a 45 min. boil is all that is necessary given a good rolling boil.
|
FYI, it's not undermodified malts, its low kilned malts that have the precursor to DMS (SMM) in them. The higher kilning given to most other malts drives off the majority of the SMM. If you have ever brewed a beer with a lot of pils malt, you know why you want to boil it all off, it smells like corn tortillas. It is present in all base malts, but only in high quantities in low kilned malts. I don't have any scientific instruments to detect SMM, so I boil for 90min to make sure it has all dissapated.
I boil all my beers for 90 minutes to get better effeciency and to get more maillard reactions in the beer, giving it a maltier flavor. If I am using pilsner malts, it helps out there as well. I have never heard the "cleaner" flavor argument before.
__________________
Fermenting: Nada
On Tap:Cran Wit, Dr Pepper Dubbel, Cascadian Pale Ale, Dark Chocolate Stout, Imperial Stout, Brown Mild, Schwarzbier
On Board: IIPA
www.franconiabrewing.com
Last edited by BarleyWater; 11-04-2008 at 07:10 AM.
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 01:23 AM
|
#7
|
|
Beer Herder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Elizabeth, CO
Posts: 2,067
|
+1 BarleyWater. My beers have improved significantly since moving to 90 minute boils.
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 12:47 PM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 693
|
"I boiled 15 minutes longer to make sure I got the right color"
-Dude
__________________
__________________________________________________
Primary: empty
Secondary: DogFish 60 Clone
Up next: The Bestist Bitter
Bottled: Blackout IPA
"Ooo Pretzels and Bier!"-Heidi Klum
Last edited by TeleTwanger; 11-04-2008 at 12:49 PM.
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 12:52 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atkinson (near the Quad Cities), IL
Posts: 17,955
|
The reason for the longer boils is for water volume to evaporate, not hop bitterness extraction... 
__________________
HB Bill
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 01:17 PM
|
#10
|
|
Tactical Prattlarian
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oblivion
Posts: 38,056
|
- Boil Off
- To breakdown DMS pre-cusors
- To form and skim hot break prior to 60 minute bittering additions
- To "slightly" increase hop utilization (See Fix, Principles or any brewing software)
- To facilitate melanoidin creation
- To better improve hot break coagulation
- To better accomodate consequtive batching.
- To allow more time for drinkin' while brewin'.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|