 |
|
12-10-2012, 03:21 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 87
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
first wort hopping
|
|
I'm making a sierra Nevada pale ale partial mash clone today and would like to try first wort hopping, but the recipe doesn't call for it.
The hop schedule is as follow:
.5 oz perle at 90 min
1 oz cascade at 45 min
1.5 oz cascade at flameout
My question is, how do I adjust for FWH? I assumed I just make my flameout addition my FWH addition instead, but I wanted to be sure. Happy brew day!
|
|
|
12-10-2012, 03:37 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 302
Liked 21 Times on 13 Posts
|
No, you would make the pearle your FWH, I usually FWH when I've collected all my wort and I start bring it to a boil, keep your flameout additions that is all your flavor/aroma
|
|
|
12-10-2012, 03:45 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Glenview, IL
Posts: 3,914
Liked 235 Times on 218 Posts Likes Given: 86
|
Exactly, take the 90 minute addition and make it the FWH and then proceed with the rest as scheduled. I AG brew and place my FWH addition in the kettle and then begin to collect my runnings. This allows the wort to begin steeping with the hops during the entire process of wort collection.
If you BIAB, it is my understanding most people add the FWH once they have collected their wort as they begin to bring up to boil.
__________________
Nothing Left to do but smile and drink beer.....
The Commune Brewing Company-Perfecting the "art" of beer since 2010
|
|
|
12-10-2012, 04:26 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 87
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
I thought the main benefit of FWH was getting flavor and aroma from the hops as well as bittering. Which is why I thought you add the flameout addition, but I'll go with the perle. Since I'm doing a partial mash I'll add them to my brew kettle as I begin collecting my wort
|
|
|
12-10-2012, 04:50 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Glenview, IL
Posts: 3,914
Liked 235 Times on 218 Posts Likes Given: 86
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhinoceroceros
I thought the main benefit of FWH was getting flavor and aroma from the hops as well as bittering. Which is why I thought you add the flameout addition, but I'll go with the perle. Since I'm doing a partial mash I'll add them to my brew kettle as I begin collecting my wort
|
The science is a little vague but with FWH you still get the bittering addition although it is slightly more mellow and for some reason there is still a retention of some flavor and aroma although it is subdued.
__________________
Nothing Left to do but smile and drink beer.....
The Commune Brewing Company-Perfecting the "art" of beer since 2010
|
|
|
12-10-2012, 07:27 PM
|
#6
|
|
Yeast Welfare Technician
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,243
Liked 177 Times on 151 Posts Likes Given: 189
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhinoceroceros
I thought the main benefit of FWH was getting flavor and aroma from the hops as well as bittering. Which is why I thought you add the flameout addition, but I'll go with the perle. Since I'm doing a partial mash I'll add them to my brew kettle as I begin collecting my wort
|
I don't buy the flavor/aroma aspect of FWH, but I have noticed a mellower bitterness which compensates for the few extra IBU you get. That's reason enough for me. I would never use FWH for flavor/aroma.
__________________
Holy cow- you guys did it. The Kickstarter was successfully funded! Now the real work begins!
twitter.com/twokidsbrewing .. facebook.com/twokidsbrewing .. twokidsbrewing.com
Bottled:Monticello Barleywine, Red Nosed Tripel
Kegs:Cali Common, Imperial Common, Sunshine Belgian Rye, Sticke Note Alt
Secondary:Cherry Blackberry melomel
Primary: Honey Blonde
On Deck: Belma Pale Ale, Cluster Fug IIPA, American IIPA v1.0, rauchbier, roggenbier
|
|
|
12-10-2012, 07:40 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Glenview, IL
Posts: 3,914
Liked 235 Times on 218 Posts Likes Given: 86
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by daksin
I don't buy the flavor/aroma aspect of FWH, but I have noticed a mellower bitterness which compensates for the few extra IBU you get. That's reason enough for me. I would never use FWH for flavor/aroma.
|
To an extent I agree with you however awhile back I was doing some small test batches and did a SMaSH with 99% MO, 1%Crystal 40 and a 1.5oz FWH of cascade as the only hop addition and believe it or not there was an element of flavor and aroma in the finished product using a 60 minute boil and two weeks primary with WY1056 fermented at 64F, finished at 1.010.
__________________
Nothing Left to do but smile and drink beer.....
The Commune Brewing Company-Perfecting the "art" of beer since 2010
|
|
|
12-10-2012, 11:09 PM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Fraser, MI
Posts: 531
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Gordon Strong in Brewing Better Beer mentions that he feels that FWH adds nothing to the aroma profile, but adds significantly to the flavor profile.
He considers FWH as providing as much as 50% more flavor than the same amount of 20 minute hops.
As an example he mentions that if he wanted a flavor addition of 1.5oz @ 20 min, he would substitute 1oz @ FWH.
Bitterness would be calculated as @ 60 minutes, but may be perceived to be lower because of the smoothness.
|
|
|
12-10-2012, 11:12 PM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mccordsville, Indiana
Posts: 731
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts
|
FWH seems to be one of those brewing ideas that some swear by while others scoff at; I tried it a half dozen times and tasted zero difference and sensed no added aromas. I am not going to say it is a myth or anything but I have not seen any added benefit. Frankly to get a real opinion you'd need to brew two batches one with a FWH and one without and have a third party (or six) taste for any differences.
__________________
Insert catchy signature here....
|
|
|
12-10-2012, 11:13 PM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 334
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts Likes Given: 3
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by duboman
To an extent I agree with you however awhile back I was doing some small test batches and did a SMaSH with 99% MO, 1%Crystal 40 and a 1.5oz FWH of cascade as the only hop addition and believe it or not there was an element of flavor and aroma in the finished product using a 60 minute boil and two weeks primary with WY1056 fermented at 64F, finished at 1.010.
|
I always thought only one grain was used for smash? No?
__________________
MOD EDIT: cussing and joke in poor taste removed
Primary=
Secondary=Bohemian Pils
Kegged = Forbidden Fruit Saison
Bottled= Belgian special dark -6/12/11
On Deck= Abita Strawberry Harvest
Blonde Ale
Hefewiesen
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|