*Ss Brewing Technologies Giveaway - Enter Now!*

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Techniques > Bulk Condition Or Bottle Condition
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-29-2007, 01:13 PM   #1
BNVince
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Linwood, NJ
Posts: 283
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default Bulk Condition Or Bottle Condition

I just racked a big stout I did after 7 days in the primary. It had an O.G. of 1.082 and after 2 hellish days of cleaning out the airlock it had dropped to 1.020.

I was reading some other threads here and saw that some people bulk conditioned their stouts anywhere from 1-3 months. The issue for them was that they had to add more yeast when bottling since most of the yeast became inactive during the bulk conditioning.

Since I don't want to add more yeast, I was planning on bulk conditioning for 2-4 weeks and then bottling with priming sugar as usual. So basically my question is, are there any advantages to bulk conditioning over bottle conditioning?

__________________
BNVince is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-29-2007, 01:53 PM   #2
Funkenjaeger
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Funkenjaeger's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 1,637
Liked 8 Times on 7 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BNVince
I just racked a big stout I did after 7 days in the primary. It had an O.G. of 1.082 and after 2 hellish days of cleaning out the airlock it had dropped to 1.020.
I think it's safe to say that for a 1.082 OG beer, you should definitely have been using a blowoff tube until it calmed down enough for an airlock.

With that said, I don't have an answer for your actual question, but I've been wondering the same thing, so I'm gonna go ahead and subscribe
__________________
Funkenjaeger is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-29-2007, 03:09 PM   #3
landhoney
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
landhoney's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Palm, FL
Posts: 1,359
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts

Default

I'd like to do a side by side test soon, not sure if anyone has done one. Basically, bottle half the batch, wait one month then bottle the rest, wait another month and then compare the two bottles( both same age, one in bottle 1 month and the other in bottle 2 months).

So far I have not noticed a difference, except that the bulk aged seem to carb slower(expected). I like bottle aging because it seems to carb quicker(maybe better) which makes me feel better and while carboy space is not a problem its easier for me to put bottles away and 'forget' about them for a while to age properly.

__________________
landhoney is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-29-2007, 03:42 PM   #4
beerdad
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 143
Default

I would think bulk would be better because when everything settles you can rack and leave the gunk behind. If you condition in bottles it will still be in the bottom of the bottle. Just a newb opinion I'm not sure how accurate that is.

__________________

Primary #1 Panty Dropper Cider
Primary #2 Honey Brown Ale
Primary #3 Scottish Ale
Secondary #1 Empty
Secondary #2 Panty Dropper Cider
Secondary #3 Empty
Secondary #4 Empty
Bottled European Ale, Corona Clone, Raspberry White Zinfandel, Old English 800 Clone
Drinking Double IPA
More Double IPA it was great!

beerdad is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-29-2007, 03:52 PM   #5
BNVince
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Linwood, NJ
Posts: 283
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beerdad
I would think bulk would be better because when everything settles you can rack and leave the gunk behind. If you condition in bottles it will still be in the bottom of the bottle. Just a newb opinion I'm not sure how accurate that is.
I was thinking the same thing but when I made my American Pale Ale I thought differently.

After 8 days in the primary and 8 days in the secondary a lot of trub and yeast had fallen out to the bottom. The secondary had a good 1 inch of trub at the bottom. Once I bottled the beer and let it condition for 5 weeks, there was very little sediment in the bottom of the bottles.

So I think their comes a time when everything that is going to fall out of suspension has fallen out of suspension or at least the majority of it has. This is why I don't see any real value to bulk conditioning for a very long time. But of course, I could be wrong.
__________________
BNVince is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-29-2007, 06:25 PM   #6
FlyGuy
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
FlyGuy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 3,618
Liked 130 Times on 41 Posts
Likes Given: 7

Default

I now bulk condition any high gravity brews and/or dark ales (e.g., stouts, porters) for 2 - 6 months in the secondary. I have tried it both ways, and the beer matures faster and tastes better when left on the yeast in the secondary. I suspect that when you bottle condition, the beer doesn't clean up or mature as well because you have left most of the yeast behind in the secondary. I have really noticed the improvement in beers that didn't ferment well and developed off-flavours, like phenols or fusels -- a couple/few months of bulk conditioning cleaned them right up, whereas bottle conditioning didn't do as well.

The only disadvantage to bulk conditioning is that you may need to add a bit of yeast to the bottling bucket to ensure carbonation. Cheap, neutral dry yeast works well for this (just be sure to rehydrate first).

FlyGuy is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-29-2007, 07:46 PM   #7
BNVince
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Linwood, NJ
Posts: 283
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyGuy
The only disadvantage to bulk conditioning is that you may need to add a bit of yeast to the bottling bucket to ensure carbonation. Cheap, neutral dry yeast works well for this (just be sure to rehydrate first).
Interesting. Well I was hoping to have a few of my brews around Christmas so that would give me around 2 months of conditioning. I may try and go one month bulk one month bottle. What is a good neutral yeast to use in the bottling bucket?

Also, and this may be a dumb question, what about siphoning off a tiny bit of the yeast that is left over in the secondary to go in to the bottling bucket? Isn't that what you would essentially have in the bottles if you didn't bulk condition for such a long time?
__________________
BNVince is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-29-2007, 08:29 PM   #8
FlyGuy
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
FlyGuy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 3,618
Liked 130 Times on 41 Posts
Likes Given: 7

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BNVince
Interesting. Well I was hoping to have a few of my brews around Christmas so that would give me around 2 months of conditioning. I may try and go one month bulk one month bottle. What is a good neutral yeast to use in the bottling bucket?
I recommend Nottingham, Safale US-05, and Coopers dry yeast. But almost any dry yeast will work fine.

Quote:
Also, and this may be a dumb question, what about siphoning off a tiny bit of the yeast that is left over in the secondary to go in to the bottling bucket? Isn't that what you would essentially have in the bottles if you didn't bulk condition for such a long time?
Not a dumb question at all -- this idea has actually generated some debate in past threads. Some people swear it works, but I haven't been so lucky. It may be recipe dependent - the higher the gravity the poorer condition those yeast will be in, particularly if you have been aging for a long time. If the yeast isn't up to the task, you can transfer a considerable amount into the bottling bucket, but still not see proper carbonation. So while this may work for some, your own mileage may vary with this method.
__________________
Cheap 10 gal cooler MLT$3 AutosiphonAluminum Pot FAQEasy Steam Injection Mash SystemMake a Frozen Yeast Bank
Improving Stovetop Boiling Improving AG Efficiency
FlyGuy is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-29-2007, 09:59 PM   #9
landhoney
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
landhoney's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Palm, FL
Posts: 1,359
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyGuy
I now bulk condition any high gravity brews and/or dark ales (e.g., stouts, porters) for 2 - 6 months in the secondary. I have tried it both ways, and the beer matures faster and tastes better when left on the yeast in the secondary. I suspect that when you bottle condition, the beer doesn't clean up or mature as well because you have left most of the yeast behind in the secondary. I have really noticed the improvement in beers that didn't ferment well and developed off-flavours, like phenols or fusels -- a couple/few months of bulk conditioning cleaned them right up, whereas bottle conditioning didn't do as well.
I think ~2 months is my minimum for my 'robust' beers. Well, assuming its cleaned up and you don't have any flaws in the beer, do you still think it matures faster in bulk?
__________________
landhoney is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-29-2007, 10:23 PM   #10
El_Borracho
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 261
Default

Damn, I love stouts and porters... I think I'm going to need to make a **** load of Wheat/Hefe's so I can wait all that time for my beer to get good...

__________________

5 gallon [US, liquid] = 640 ounce [US, liquid]

El_Borracho is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply



Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Bulk Condition? captianoats Wine Making Forum 3 06-17-2009 09:55 PM
How long do you condition in kegs? ANd do you condition under pressure? fat x nub Bottling/Kegging 7 08-09-2008 12:33 AM
bottle condition or bulk condition for big belgians? SenorWanderer Bottling/Kegging 3 04-04-2008 06:34 PM
Bottle or Bulk Condition While Away? Neomich General Techniques 3 12-21-2007 04:14 PM
bottle condition from AG simonj All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 5 07-04-2006 02:05 PM