Ss Brewing Technologies Giveaway!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Techniques > Anyone ever heard of this???
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-06-2006, 06:18 PM   #1
kfgolfer
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 128
Default Anyone ever heard of this???

has anyone ever added 1-2 oz. of priming sugar to your beer as you are racking to the secondary fermenter??? I hear it's supposed to add alcohol to your beer and also reduce oxidation??

__________________
kfgolfer is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-06-2006, 06:25 PM   #2
BeanPot Brewery
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 66
Default

I'm sure someone around here can answer this better than I, but I've never heard of it. In theory, it should add alcohol bc you're adding sugar and increasing fermentation...it would also reduce oxidition since the act of fermentation releases CO2, which pushes out oxygen.
I have reservations about this, though. Primarily why you would want to add sugar and not add more DME, if getting more alcohol is the end goal.
Also, I would be careful if you are going to bottle condition to get carbonation, adding too much sugar may not leave enough hungry yeasties to do the job properly.

__________________
BeanPot Brewery is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-06-2006, 06:25 PM   #3
the_bird
10th-Level Beer Nerd
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
the_bird's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Adams, MA
Posts: 20,499
Liked 371 Times on 306 Posts
Likes Given: 98

Default

I don't know about the oxidation, but if you add a fermentable sugar you're bound to increase the alcohol content. Why not just add it to the boil, though?

Theoretically, I suppose re-starting fermentation would do a better job of creating a CO2 "blanket", so it might not be a bad idea.

One or two ounces in a five gallon batch isn't going to do jack for the alcohol content, though.

__________________
Come join Yankee Ingenuity!

"I'm kind of toasted. But I looked at my watch and it's only 6:30 so I can't stop drinking yet." - Yooper's Bob
"Brown eye finally recovered after the abuse it endured in Ptown last weekend, but it took almost a full week." - Paulie
"no, he just doesn't speak 'stupid'. i, however, am fluent...." - motobrewer
"... I'll go both ways." - Melana

That'll do, Pigley. That'll do.
the_bird is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-07-2006, 01:57 AM   #4
feedthebear
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 697
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts

Default

I added 2 Tbsp. of sugar to my Peach Cream Ale when i racked to the tertiary. I was really paranoid that the yeast had either died off or settled out. But as fermentation started up within 15 minutes of transfering, I really didn't have anything to worry about.

__________________
Planning: Agave Witbock, Raisin Beer
Primary: GF Hazelnut Stout
Tertiary: Cranberry-Pom pLambic (est. bottle date: 03/01/08)
Drinking: Cab.Sav/Merlot Wine, Grand Cru, Hazelnut Stout #3, Ordinary Bitter
feedthebear is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-07-2006, 02:23 AM   #5
Sir Humpsalot
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sir Humpsalot's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Liked 81 Times on 65 Posts
Likes Given: 22

Default

My purely academic viewpoint: From all that I've read, the act of racking to a secondary, by itself, is going to reinvigorate the yeast and upturn enough fermentable sugars to get some airlock activity. So I don't see how adding a little sugar is going to hurt anything, although I also don't think it's really necessary.

__________________
Sir Humpsalot is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-07-2006, 02:27 AM   #6
Kaiser
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Kaiser's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pepperell, MA
Posts: 3,904
Liked 114 Times on 71 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

I can see oxidation being prevented (somewhat at least) by reactivating the yeast with the sugar. The now active yeast is able to absorb oxygen that has been picked up during racking.

I started racking my beers when they are almost but not completely done. At this point most of the reast settled, but the yeast remaining in suspension should be active enough to absorb O2 that had been added as well as produce enough CO2 to purge the head space. I'll see if that makes a difference or not.

Kai

Kaiser is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-07-2006, 09:27 AM   #7
dantodd
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dantodd's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Carlos, CA
Posts: 1,155
Liked 9 Times on 8 Posts

Default

I doubt it will make a discernible difference. The act of racking itself will mix up the beer enough to release some of the CO2 that is in solution. This will likely release more CO2 than a tablespoon of sugar will and it will be done at the time of racking and not after a couple hours of fermentation.

__________________
dantodd is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-07-2006, 10:36 AM   #8
boo boo
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hearts's Delight, Newfoundland
Posts: 4,171
Liked 30 Times on 26 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

By starting fermentation again you are defeating the purpose of secondary fermentation which is to let the yeast settle and clean up the products it produced in the initial fermentation.

The act of racking will bring out of suspension enough co2 to blanket the wort and protect it from oxyidation as long as you rack without splashing or otherwise aerating your wort.

__________________

How do you BBQ an elephant....first you get your elephant....

boo boo is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-07-2006, 12:36 PM   #9
Desert_Sky
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Desert_Sky's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 4,090
Liked 35 Times on 32 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

most of the time simply racking to the secondary is going to stir up the yeast and release enough CO2 to form a nice blanket to prevent oxidation anyways.

__________________
Desert Sky Brewing Co.
Sierra Vista, AZ
Desert_Sky is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-07-2006, 12:48 PM   #10
Ol' Grog
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chickasha, OK.
Posts: 1,037
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

My observations have been that with Chimone. After racking and the air lock is put on, there is usually some bubbler activity, not a lot, but enough to leave a good blanket of CO2 on top of the brew. I've read that that is why it's good to only use a 5.5 gallon secondary, less air in there versus a 6.5 gallon one.

__________________
Ol' Grog is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply



Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Never heard of this?! ctbrewer227 Recipes/Ingredients 1 01-08-2009 02:19 PM
Has anyone ever heard of this? magno General Techniques 7 01-04-2007 03:01 PM
Have you heard this? God Emporer BillyBrew General Chit Chat 2 11-15-2005 06:24 PM
ever heard of... drengel Commercial Brew Discussion 1 10-26-2005 06:11 PM