Happy HolidaySs Giveaway - Winners Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-Drawn - 24 hours to Claim!

Get your HBT Growlers, Shirts and Membership before the Rush!


Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Techniques > Alcohol free attempt fail...
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-20-2011, 03:38 PM   #1
Docthorjp
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Trois-Rivières, Québec
Posts: 15
Default Alcohol free attempt fail...

Hi,
I tried to produce an alcohol free beer for my step-sister who is pregnant. It didn't work and I don't really understand why. I need your suggestions. There are the processes I used :

1) Canadian 2 row malt + carafoam = OG: 1.042
2) Mash at 83°C (181°F) for more body and less fermentable sugars
3) Only primary (wyeast Abbey ale) for 7 days = FG: 1.011
4) Final alcohol supposed to be 4.1%ABV
5) Heat primary to 80°C (176°F) for 1h30 to evaporate ethanol and mixing 4-5 times
6) Bottling with dextrose and adding fresh yeast
7) After 3 weeks, samples were tested on a GCMS (gas chromatography - mass spec) by a specialized company
8) Result : 5.1%!!

So, I don't really know what happened. There is more alcohol than it suppose to be. The only mistake I have done, I think, it's that I didn't stir continuously when I heated it to evaporate alcohol...

__________________
Docthorjp is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-20-2011, 04:06 PM   #2
wilserbrewer
Sponsor
HBT_SPONSOR.png
Vendor Ads 
Feedback Score: 9 reviews
 
wilserbrewer's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Jersey Shore, Jersey
Posts: 7,276
Liked 573 Times on 468 Posts
Likes Given: 11

Default

I would guess that you didnt get hot enough to drive off the ethyl. 176 is only 3 degrees above boiling, so if you had any error, the alchohol remained. I would bring it up to 185 - 190 to be certain.

wilserbrewer is online now
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-20-2011, 07:10 PM   #3
audger
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: ., Connecticut
Posts: 1,497
Liked 40 Times on 40 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

mashing at 181F is how you extract tannins from the grain and immediately denature all your enzymes. there would have been no starch or long chain sugar conversion at all in that mash. at that point you were really just steeping the grain in hot water, not 'mashing'.

and when you are distilling off the alcohol, instead of heating the beer to 176F or higher, normally you pull a vaccuum on the container to lower the boiling point enough so that you dont change the flavor of the beer. heating it again after fermentation can add considerable amounts of negative flavors. normally you pull enough of a vacuum on it so that the boiling point of ethanol is lower than 120-140F.

from those gravities, you only had about 60% attenuation, which is low for that yeast. which is probably explained by lack of available sugars for it to eat. you should also have 4% ABV, which means that either your annalysis company was wrong, or your measured OG and FG numbers arent accurate (more likely).
pint.com.au - Brewing Calculator - Alcohol and Attenuation

if you are really going non-alcoholic for someone pregnant, you should force carbonate, as bottle conditioning will add even more alcohol (albeit a small amount).

__________________
audger is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-20-2011, 08:05 PM   #4
Denny
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eugene OR
Posts: 4,318
Liked 440 Times on 332 Posts
Likes Given: 545

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by audger View Post
mashing at 181F is how you extract tannins from the grain and immediately denature all your enzymes.
Denature enzymes, yes. Tannin extraction is much more dependent on pH than temp, though. If it wasn't, you couldn't do decoctions. In a decoction mash, you boil the grain, yet you don't get excessive tannins from it.
__________________

Life begins at 60....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

http://www.experimentalbrew.com - the website for the book "Experimental Homebrewing"...coming Nov. 2014

Denny is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-20-2011, 08:10 PM   #5
Yuri_Rage
Gritty.
HBT_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Yuri_Rage's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Southwest
Posts: 13,995
Liked 631 Times on 394 Posts
Likes Given: 58

Default

Post your exact recipe as well as mash and boil volumes. Your stated measurements seem a bit off.

__________________
Homebrewed Blog..........YouTube Channel .......... Shirts, posters, etc
Yuri_Rage is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-20-2011, 08:21 PM   #6
dcp27
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 4,095
Liked 121 Times on 117 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

sounds like broken thermometer was the problem. a 181F mash would never get close to 74% attenuation.

__________________
dcp27 is offline
malkore Likes This 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-20-2011, 09:07 PM   #7
Misplaced_Canuck
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Misplaced_Canuck's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NE Columbia SC - Formerly, Montreal Canada
Posts: 2,782
Liked 138 Times on 112 Posts
Likes Given: 42

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Docthorjp View Post
2) Mash at 83°C (181°F) for more body and less fermentable sugars
That's a double mistake. 1) 181F is too high and won't have any enzymatic activity. 2) While you want residual sugars, mashing soooo high will create too much of it.

If you mash at normal temperatures (say 153F), and evaporate the alcohol, the body will increase. Alcohol is, by nature, "thinner" than the normal body of a beer.

I might actually consider mashing LOWER to prevent too much residual sweetness, say 150-151F.

M_C
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Misplaced_Canuck
Carbonic bite? Is that like the bubonic plague?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebstauffer
Needless to say after more than a few drams my mental efficiency matched my mashing efficiency.
Misplaced_Canuck is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-20-2011, 09:40 PM   #8
Lennie
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hannibal, MO
Posts: 555
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

I don't think you can effectively remove ethanol from a water solution by heating it to the BP of ethanol. Or at least it would take a lot longer than 1.5hrs.

You might be better off doing something like steeping some specialty grains, crystal and a generous amount of dextrine malt, then boiling that for a bit with some hops to approximate a beer without fermentation.

__________________
Lennie is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-20-2011, 09:56 PM   #9
BrewKnurd
Formerly discnjh
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BrewKnurd's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Prairieville, LA
Posts: 2,757
Liked 240 Times on 199 Posts
Likes Given: 112

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lennie View Post
I don't think you can effectively remove ethanol from a water solution by heating it to the BP of ethanol. Or at least it would take a lot longer than 1.5hrs.
This. I mean, it sounds simple, but if you're not boiling, you're not boiling. You're just doing hot evaporation. And while that is faster than a cool evaporation, I don't think you can expect to drive of a significant amount of ethanol in a reltively short period of time without boiling it.

I don't know what the actual boiling point of a 5-6% ethanol solution is, but its probably up around 205 deg F.
__________________

Fake it til you make it.

BrewKnurd is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-20-2011, 10:03 PM   #10
Lennie
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hannibal, MO
Posts: 555
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Plus when you do boil, the steam coming off is the same ratio as the solution at first, and only ratchets towards the 95% ethanol (the azeotrope) as the distilation progresses.

__________________
Lennie is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply



Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First Filter was a Fail Stevorino General Techniques 9 05-26-2010 08:39 PM
Alcohol-Free Beer Recipe??? bckyrdkid420 General Techniques 21 03-28-2010 08:14 PM
Mini Sparge in Strainer -- Fail Musketear General Techniques 3 11-03-2009 03:34 AM
Starter = Fail FishinDave07 General Techniques 12 07-25-2008 03:02 AM
too much alcohol? Radler General Techniques 1 02-27-2006 11:22 AM



Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS