 |
|
08-09-2010, 01:54 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: england
Posts: 6
|
At what strength (% by vol) does a drink become flammable
|
|
ie Brandy at 35% is, wine at 12% isn't.
|
|
|
08-09-2010, 01:57 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 5,809
Liked 134 Times on 117 Posts Likes Given: 23
|
Brandy at 35% is, really? I don't think I was ever able to get an 80 proof alcohol to catch flame (at least more than just a split-second flash.) I think the ability to make flaming shots begins at 100 proof.
__________________
Primary: Sahti, Strawberry Banana Blonde, Caramel Quad
Kegged: Cascadian Dark Ale -- Punkin' Ale -- "Bitter and Rye" American-style Bitter
Bottled: English Barleywine (brewed 9/26/09 -- bottled 5/5/10)
LET'S GO LA!
LA CAMPIONE!
PLAY FOR GLORY, THE GLORY LA!
|
|
|
08-09-2010, 02:11 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 3,655
Liked 32 Times on 31 Posts
|
I believe brandy is not flammable but if you heat it, it will produce flammable vapor (eg flambe).
|
|
|
08-09-2010, 02:34 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Willamina & Oak Grove, Oregon, USA
Posts: 25,616
Liked 108 Times on 103 Posts
|
Oddly enough, 100 proof is the standard. Before there were good methods for determining ABV, flammability was proof of the strength.
|
|
|
08-09-2010, 02:44 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 82
|
proof is a throwback to when they would proof by gunpowder. the higher the proof, the larger the flame, and the faster the gunpowder lit. i think that 80 proof is minimum to light. According to wikipedia (and most people that I have talked to about this), it is 100 proof, but I did see an Episode of Good Eats (yesterday) where AB lit an 80 proof liquor in a tray of gunpowder.
__________________
Hmmm...out of beer. How the heck did that happen?!
|
|
|
08-09-2010, 03:23 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: McLean/Ogden, Virginia/Quebec
Posts: 3,803
Liked 203 Times on 172 Posts Likes Given: 7
|
In the old days proof spirits were spirits that would ignite alone (in some cases) or when poured over gun powder (in other jurisdictions). In any case, 100 proof is roughly the concentration at which you should be able to sustain a flame but certainly flambee'd desserts are made with spirits at lower proof. In those heat seems to be used to drive the vapors out of solution and it is the vapors that are ignited. That also seems to be the case with, for example, sambucca (84 proof) which is often served flaming.
|
|
|
08-09-2010, 05:08 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 4,384
Liked 26 Times on 26 Posts
|
You guys are all wrong. Flaming Moes light up just fine and are made with cough syrup.
__________________
Early brewers were primarily women, mostly because it was deemed a woman's job. Mesopotamian men, of some 3,800 years ago, were obviously complete assclowns and had yet to realize the pleasure of brewing beer.- Beer Advocate
|
|
|
08-09-2010, 05:23 PM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 1,187
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts Likes Given: 8
|
mmmmm Flaming Moe! (drool)
|
|
|
08-09-2010, 05:25 PM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: denver
Posts: 131
|
You can also proof by the bubble retention and size.
100 proof is theoretical. If you aspirate/mist wine, you can light the alcohol in it.
|
|
|
08-09-2010, 05:29 PM
|
#10
|
|
Where is my screw on thumb???
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: louisville
Posts: 9,197
Liked 631 Times on 525 Posts Likes Given: 853
|
Which all begs the question........
WHY?
__________________
justwhatthehellareYOUlookingat?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|