Quote:
Originally Posted by bootney
I then just switched to calcium chloride and started to get better results. With an IPA I hit 5.17, and ever since that batch my last 3 have had a pH between 5.35 and 5.45. I did a darker Scottish ale compared to the Belgians and IPA's that I usually brew and did add some chalk to the brew and hit 5.4.
So all in all I'm pleased with the results. I brew the same IPA recipe every other month so I'm looking forward to comparing the 5.17 to the other batches. The non carbonated 5.17 had less of a tartness to it compared to my previous attempts. Not sure if that would be something to expect.
Here are a few new questions. I have always used 1/4 tsp of wyeast nutrient for my starters, 1/2 tsp for the boil, and 1/4 tsp a day after high Kräusen. My question does this nutrient impact flavor of the beer?
Second question would be with a pumpkin ale I plan to brew next month, and does pumpkin have any effect on mash pH one way or the other?
|
I don't think that you'll see much of a difference in between a 5.17 pH mash porter vs 5.4 pH mash porter. The difference is not hugely significant.
I don't believe that a small amount of yeast nutrient would directly affect the beer, but if your pitching rates are changed (if this case, positively/higher), then yes, you would get a change in your beer. Generally speaking, you'd get a better beer and mellower flavors, and possibly a slightly lower finishing gravity.
M_C