 |
|
01-25-2013, 04:12 PM
|
#11
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pepperell, MA
Posts: 3,905
Liked 88 Times on 59 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
There is a correlation between beer color and necessary water RA to get the mash pH into a desirable range. But the correlation that John found was not correct. I did some work on that and found that roasted malts don't contribute as much acidity per unit of color as crystal malts do. And because most really dark beers get most of their color from roasted malts they don't need nearly as much RA as one may think. Here is something I published based on research I did in 2009 : http://braukaiser.com/wiki/index.php?title=Beer_color,_alkalinity_and_mash_pH
There are a few tables at the bottom that show RA for color and the percentage of color that comes from roasted malts.
As A.J pointed out until recently the primary additive for increasing RA was calcium carbonate. But I noticed that calcium carbonate is not as effective at raising mash pH as one would think. What happened is that brewers added lots of chalk thinking it would get them the high RA that was needed. Fortunately chalk is not able to raise the mash pH all that much and the beers turned out fine. In many cases they turned out better than w/o the chalk since they needed some increased RA. Because of that John's spreadsheet was not questioned.
Kai
|
|
|
01-25-2013, 04:31 PM
|
#12
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 921
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
AJ, that is what I was thinking about the buffers. I am not one to trust much a single ingredient to do such things, as there are way too many variables from brew to brew.
Kaiser, thanks for the info on that all. I will give the spreadsheet a look over as well as the site (took a glance, will read in detail later). Thanks for all the info!
What I am getting from this is really to only worry if my pH is out of range, and not worry if I hit a good pH even if the RA seems off.
|
|
|
01-25-2013, 04:40 PM
|
#13
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pepperell, MA
Posts: 3,905
Liked 88 Times on 59 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall_Yotie
What I am getting from this is really to only worry if my pH is out of range, and not worry if I hit a good pH even if the RA seems off.
|
"RA being off" depends on how RA is calculated. If the necessary RA is calculated correctly it won't be "off".
Kai
|
|
|
01-25-2013, 04:51 PM
|
#14
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 921
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
Well Kaiser, according you your spreadsheet (with me sitting at 87% roasted as it is VERY heavy handed), without any additions I am sitting at an estimated (I understand the term estimated) mash pH of 5.42, which means I am just going to brew with my water straight and see what the pH comes out to, and fly from there.
edit: If I plan to add the Roasted grains at the end of the mash, will that change this? Would you aim a water profile for the without roasted or the with roasted?
|
|
|
01-25-2013, 05:02 PM
|
#15
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pepperell, MA
Posts: 3,905
Liked 88 Times on 59 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
Stone Brewing brews its RIS with San Diego water that has an even lower RA than your. So yes, you'll be fine w/o any additional alkalinity.
Kai
|
|
|
01-26-2013, 07:45 PM
|
#16
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 921
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
Well. Just mashed, used a pH strip, and with adding 0.3 I got 4.7-4.9 (hard yo tell exactly). So, seems I am a bit low! This is my control batch, will do this one again with adjusted water and see this difference. The beer is my best one, so no such thing as too much!
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 05:30 PM
|
#17
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 921
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
OK, I used the "EZ Water Calculator", which estimated my pH to be 5.6; the "Kaiser Water Calculator" says 5.3 (87% roast); however, my mash says 4.7! That is with pulling a few drops off after the mash went for about 15 minutes, let them cool for a short bit, and used a pH strip (adding 0.3 to the value). I got a 63% efficiency, on my smaller / lighter colored ales I tend to hit my 75%.
This is with no water adjustments.
To get the calculated mash pH that low I have to do some REALLY weird stuff to my starting values.
Sooooo.... where is the most likely place I could be going wrong?
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 05:42 PM
|
#18
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pepperell, MA
Posts: 3,905
Liked 88 Times on 59 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
so what was the grist for this?
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 05:44 PM
|
#19
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 921
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
15lb base malt
1lb victory
1lb roasted barley
0.5lb black patent
0.5lb Crystal 60
0.5lb Crystal 60
0.5lb carapils
Mashed at 1qt/lb
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 10:08 PM
|
#20
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Carmel, IN
Posts: 1,843
Liked 72 Times on 62 Posts Likes Given: 13
|
Why such a thick mash at 1 qt/lb? With Kai's findings, I've moved to 1.5 qt/lb as my typical. Is your mash tun too small?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|