HBT 2015 Big Giveaway - Enter Now

Huge Supporting Membership Discounts - 20% Off

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Brew Science > Lesser of two weevils.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2010, 02:15 PM   #1
GilaMinumBeer
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
GilaMinumBeer's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 50,517
Liked 5428 Times on 4821 Posts
Likes Given: 66

Default Lesser of two weevils.

I am curtious to hear, umm read, thoughts/speculations from the panel on the microscopic (enzymatic, protenatious, acidification, etc...)impact between two popular methods of mashing.

The first (derived by Conrad and Fix) employs a cold dough-in, recirculation, and direct heat to the target rest temperature. Essentially involving a drive by scenario through all the subsequent rest stages up to the target for an indeterminate amount of time (dependent on the heating efficiency of the system and the btu's applied).

The second involves Infusion of a large mass of water at temps above the threshold of denaturization with the result of heating loss in the mass of grain to the target rest temp.

No doubt there is some level of chemical reaction and enzymatic response, perhaps insignifigant in the big picture, but what is that level and what is likely occuring within the two methods?

__________________
GilaMinumBeer is online now
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-24-2010, 04:54 PM   #2
ColoradoXJ13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Somerville, MA
Posts: 1,274
Liked 17 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

From what I have read and learned from breweries, the first scenario is more important for poorly modified malts, and some particular beer styles. The latter (which is used by me and most brewers I have spoken with) works just fine for highly modified (modern) malts.

__________________
ColoradoXJ13 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-25-2010, 12:25 AM   #3
AiredAle
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 474
Liked 17 Times on 13 Posts

Default

I doubt there is any denaturation taking place in the hot water/cold grain infusion procedure for two reasons. First, it takes some time at temperature to denature an enzyme, and the time it takes for the hot water and cold grain to equilibrate and drop the overall temp below the denaturation temp of the amylase enzymes isn't long enough to do any harm. Two, the enzymes are less susceptible to denaturation in their dry state than when they are hydrated and dissolved, so even if they experience denaturation temps when in the dry state, they are safe.

__________________
AiredAle is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply



Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid Weevils Grain is for Beer... s1080 All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 8 08-16-2009 04:09 PM
Filthy Weevils in my grain, meet my foodsaver! TheDom Equipment/Sanitation 29 05-31-2008 09:24 AM
Could I have a poll about weevils please? Poindexter Recipes/Ingredients 17 12-02-2007 11:56 AM
Priming - Lesser of 2 evils Fenster Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 5 09-20-2007 10:57 PM



Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS