 |
|
07-31-2012, 08:54 PM
|
#11
|
|
Formerly discnjh
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Prairieville, LA
Posts: 2,579
Liked 207 Times on 174 Posts Likes Given: 91
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GotPushrods
As usual he is right on.
I guess I was just implying that when the K value (the equilibrium constant) is soooo small or large (in this case large for the simplified, overall reaction) under mash conditions.... you can essentially "round off" LeChatelier for practical purposes.
There is still some cool chemistry going on, but as a homebrewer it will be very difficult to actually take advantage of the fact that it's in equilibrium.
If that makes sense...
|
And it would appear we are indeed all on the exact same page. 
__________________
Fake it til you make it.
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 10:30 PM
|
#12
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: welligton, nzl
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrewKnurd
Le chateliers principle applies only to equilibrium situations. Starches being broken down into sugars in a mash is a one way process. Nothing is putting the sugars back together to make starches.
|
Ah, yes, that makes sense. I wondered that it didn't apply.
|
|
|
08-01-2012, 03:18 PM
|
#13
|
|
Look under the recliner
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: State College, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,038
Liked 87 Times on 81 Posts Likes Given: 10
|
Equilibrium is a weird word. It has a common definition and technical definition that is the same - forward and reverse reactions at the same rate resulting in no net change (of whatever). However "commonly" people think of this in the realm of whole numbers (i.e. 50/50, even 95/5) yet technically, something can be at equilibrium at ratios like 1 million to 1
__________________
On Tap: CAP, Saison, Kolsch
Kegged and Aging/Lagering: Imperial Alt, CAP, GDR pils, Kolsch, OKZ (std Amer. lager), CZ pils
Secondary:
Primary: Saison, Session IPA
Brewing soon: IPA, light beer - yes, light beer
Recently kicked : ( Bock, Baltic Porter, Ger. Pils, Lite IPA,
Pilsner Urquell Master Homebrewer (1st NYC 2011, 2nd NYC 2012)
P U crowns winners in its inaugural master HB competition
|
|
|
08-01-2012, 04:33 PM
|
#14
|
|
Formerly discnjh
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Prairieville, LA
Posts: 2,579
Liked 207 Times on 174 Posts Likes Given: 91
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pjj2ba
Equilibrium is a weird word. It has a common definition and technical definition that is the same - forward and reverse reactions at the same rate resulting in no net change (of whatever). However "commonly" people think of this in the realm of whole numbers (i.e. 50/50, even 95/5) yet technically, something can be at equilibrium at ratios like 1 million to 1
|
Absolutely. And even taken to the extreme of a hypothetical reaction that was absolutely one way, with no way for the reverse reaction to occur, it would still meet the defintion of equilibrium once the reaction was complete, as the forward and reverse reactions would both be happening at the same rate, that being not at all.
__________________
Fake it til you make it.
|
|
|
08-01-2012, 04:38 PM
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: McLean/Ogden, Virginia/Quebec
Posts: 3,884
Liked 223 Times on 187 Posts Likes Given: 7
|
I guess a formal definition would say that all derivatives of the state variables are 0 meaning that if the system is not disturbed nothing will change no matter how long you wait.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|