 |
|
09-30-2011, 05:02 PM
|
#101
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Carmel, IN
Posts: 1,843
Liked 72 Times on 62 Posts Likes Given: 13
|
There hasn't been a shift in the actual pH. I think the difference is that other resources were reporting mash pH's at mash temperature instead of mash pH after the sample is cooled to room temperature. That is roughly a 0.2 to 0.3 difference (room temp pH is higher than at mash temp).
|
|
|
09-30-2011, 05:38 PM
|
#102
|
|
Vendor
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 1,839
Liked 36 Times on 32 Posts Likes Given: 7
|
Nice, I like the new workbook.
I will brew tomorrow so I will have a chance to review this soon.
Are you planning on a sparge acidification sheet anytime soon?
|
|
|
10-02-2011, 07:37 AM
|
#103
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Last Station
Posts: 606
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
I'm using this Calculator for the first time and as I put my water profile and the amount of grain in , it gave me 11 as the Residual Alkalinity .
Since I'm using only 2-row pale malt , I'd like to know if I can really get the SRM related to this RA ?!
Hector
|
|
|
10-02-2011, 01:25 PM
|
#104
|
|
Frau Administrator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upper Michigan
Posts: 51,609
Liked 1933 Times on 1486 Posts Likes Given: 87
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hector
I'm using this Calculator for the first time and as I put my water profile and the amount of grain in , it gave me 11 as the Residual Alkalinity .
Since I'm using only 2-row pale malt , I'd like to know if I can really get the SRM related to this RA ?!
Hector
|
Of course you can. It depends on the water you start with. But don't consider SRM, because the actual color of the beer doesn't matter.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006
|
|
|
10-02-2011, 01:54 PM
|
#105
|
|
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Thiensville, Wisconsin
Posts: 5,995
Liked 148 Times on 135 Posts Likes Given: 268
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mabrungard
There hasn't been a shift in the actual pH. I think the difference is that other resources were reporting mash pH's at mash temperature instead of mash pH after the sample is cooled to room temperature. That is roughly a 0.2 to 0.3 difference (room temp pH is higher than at mash temp).
|
ah, ok. so, it's 5.4-5.6 at room temp, and 5.2-5.4 at mash temp?
__________________
Quote:
The man who intoxicates himself on bad whisky is sometimes moved to kill his wife and set his house on fire, but the victim of applejack is capable of blowing up a whole town with dynamite and of reciting original poetry to every surviving inhabitant.
– "A Wicked Beverage," New York Times, April 10, 1894
|
"srsly, not intended to threadjack (big hairy)"
|
|
|
10-02-2011, 02:22 PM
|
#106
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,565
Liked 78 Times on 61 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
I'm brewing a darker american style hoppy beer (Janet's Brown Ale at 18 SRM, 1.066 OG, 63 IBU).
Normally for hoppy american style beers (IIPAs, IPAs, APAs) I target Randy Mosher's ideal Pale Ale numbers (Ca=110, Mg=18, Na=17, Cl=50, S04=350) to bring out some of the hop brightness and never have issues. Salts get added to both the Mash and Boil as expected.
For my water and volumes this would be the following for this beer:
Add to mash: 10.8g CaSO4, 2.9g CaCl2, 5.3g MgSO4
Add to boil: 12.1g CaSO4, 3.2g CaCl2, 5.9g MgSO4
However, because of the darkness of this beer I hit the proper pH range in the mash *without* adding any mash salts. So I left them out.
I'll still add the boil salts to the boil but I'm wondering how much of the mash salts (if any) I should I also add to the boil?
My understanding is that when sparging, 100% of the mash salts don't make it over so I don't want to simply dump *all* the salts in the boil. Problem is I don't know how much does or what I should do to compensate. Any hints? Just add the boil salts? Add the boil salts plus 50% of the mash salts? Something else?
Kal
|
|
|
10-02-2011, 03:53 PM
|
#107
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,565
Liked 78 Times on 61 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kal
I'm brewing a darker american style hoppy beer (Janet's Brown Ale at 18 SRM, 1.066 OG, 63 IBU).
Normally for hoppy american style beers (IIPAs, IPAs, APAs) I target Randy Mosher's ideal Pale Ale numbers (Ca=110, Mg=18, Na=17, Cl=50, S04=350) to bring out some of the hop brightness and never have issues. Salts get added to both the Mash and Boil as expected.
For my water and volumes this would be the following for this beer:
Add to mash: 10.8g CaSO4, 2.9g CaCl2, 5.3g MgSO4
Add to boil: 12.1g CaSO4, 3.2g CaCl2, 5.9g MgSO4
However, because of the darkness of this beer I hit the proper pH range in the mash *without* adding any mash salts. So I left them out.
I'll still add the boil salts to the boil but I'm wondering how much of the mash salts (if any) I should I also add to the boil?
My understanding is that when sparging, 100% of the mash salts don't make it over so I don't want to simply dump *all* the salts in the boil. Problem is I don't know how much does or what I should do to compensate. Any hints? Just add the boil salts? Add the boil salts plus 50% of the mash salts? Something else?
|
For anyone's who's curious: I ended up throwin in the mash salts anyway and the mash pH only dropped an extra 0.01 - 0.02, likely due to the excellent buffering capacity of this mash. So all is good. I'll have the flavour profile that I like/expect.
Kal
|
|
|
10-02-2011, 04:25 PM
|
#108
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Western Chicago Burbs, IL
Posts: 1,489
Liked 45 Times on 39 Posts Likes Given: 44
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by motobrewer
ah, ok. so, it's 5.4-5.6 at room temp, and 5.2-5.4 at mash temp?
|
After much reading on this topic, that is my understanding.
__________________
"If you're here for the premature ejaculators meeting, you've come too soon."
|
|
|
10-03-2011, 12:58 PM
|
#109
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: fairmont, wv
Posts: 8
|
I am glad I came across this thread, I used EZ several times and was still trying to wrap my head around why it did not seem to agree with palmers SRM nomograph. Thanks
|
|
|
10-04-2011, 12:28 AM
|
#110
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tahoe
Posts: 697
Liked 9 Times on 9 Posts Likes Given: 8
|
OK, having not used this since, probably 1.0, I like it better because it has pH. HOWEVER, I am confused and wonder if there is problems in the pH calculation.
Let me explain. I have very low mineral content water. It is:
(Ca ppm) (Mg ppm) (Na ppm) (Cl ppm) (SO4 ppm)Alkalinity (CaCO3 ppm)
16 1 8 0.5 0.5 59
I've been adjusting it to:
96 11 8 77 131 59
The last time I checked pH during a mash (with a good meter, .05 accuracy), it was about 5.2-5.3 with a light colored (6-7 SRM) beer. Your 3.0 spreadsheet shows my pH would be 5.65.
I thought this may be because I was using a thinner mash than I used to. But changing the quantity of mash water vs. sparge makes no difference in the pH in the spreadsheet. Is that right? Seems like it would change. Also, I cannot really change the effective mash pH in the program without using acidulated malt, or adding about 10-20 times the amount of pH down (gypsum, calcium chloride, and epsom salt) I currently use!
Just asking. I haven't played with the new spreadsheet much yet, and I haven't located the exact recipe I used when I checked the pH (although it was the same SRM). Next beer I'll check pH again, but I'm getting great efficiency and no astrigency with a similar recipe, so I'm not thinking my pH is suddenly higher....
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|