 |
|
03-30-2009, 08:54 AM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Poland, EU
Posts: 463
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
|
EBC -> SRM formula; Weyermann malts have wrong colors?
|
|
While trying to find substitute for Crystal 60 amongst Wyeyermann caramel malts, and I've noticed something strange: EBC values given for those malts don't match SRM/Lovibond values!
example: for Caramunich III , 160 EBC they give 60 Lovibond
http://www.browamator.pl/zdjecia/3/9/9/7198_Weyermann_Caramunich_III.pdf
While it should be (SRM=EBC*0.508) around 80 Lov
I contacted Weyermann via my LHBS, and I got the answer:
Andreas Richter, Weyermann quality director explains, that they use formula published by Sibel Institute,
Lovibond = EBC x 0,375 + 0,56
I see this formula here and there in the net, sometimes they explain that this is formula for old EBC norm, abandoned in 1991 and should not be used any more.
Can somebody back me up with some knowledge, which formula is correct, so that I could continue the discussion with Weyermann.
Last edited by Piotr; 03-30-2009 at 09:00 AM.
|
|
|
03-30-2009, 11:37 AM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 3,655
Liked 32 Times on 31 Posts
|
Lovibond is not the same as SRM.
SRM was designed to match lovibond well at lower numbers but there is no linear relationship between them.
EBC does related to SRM linearly and, ergo not to lovibond linearly.
|
|
|
03-30-2009, 12:30 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 4,564
Liked 30 Times on 30 Posts
|
I've never looked into it that much, but this is my understanding:
Lovibond is the degree to which malt is roasted
SRM is a measure of how dark or light a beer is (does not indicate color)
|
|
|
03-30-2009, 05:16 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,278
Liked 21 Times on 19 Posts
|
Noonan gives this formula: [EBC = (°L X 2.65) - 1.2] and states:
Quote:
|
In the United States, color is expressed in terms of the Standard Research Method (SRM) values set by the ASBC or in °Lovibond, an older method of visual measurement upon which SRM is based (the two measurements are essentially equivalent).
|
__________________
END TRANSMISSION
|
|
|
03-30-2009, 05:45 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 3,655
Liked 32 Times on 31 Posts
|
The Noonan relationship and the Siebel relationship are nearly identical.
Rearrange Noonan
Lov = .377EBC + .45
Compared to Siebel (via Weyermann)
Lov = .375EBC + .56
I would guess they are based on the same data and the Siebel formula was designed to be used by hand, using 3/8 as a convenient multiple.
|
|
|
03-31-2009, 08:59 AM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Poland, EU
Posts: 463
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
|
I've found some sort of explanation of the phenomenon:
EBC controversy
"However many maltsters and brewers still, especially in the US, use and reference to the older SRM-EBC conversion. So for convenience and to avoid some problems the older EBC values were used – hard to break old habits"
Does it mean, that in USA you use differnent EBC's than in Europe?
|
|
|
07-07-2010, 07:59 PM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1
|
You all seem to be ignoring the only answer that was right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by remilard
Lovibond is not the same as SRM.
SRM was designed to match lovibond well at lower numbers but there is no linear relationship between them.
EBC does related to SRM linearly and, ergo not to lovibond linearly.
|
The Lovibond system was designed before the spectrometer was invented. To use it, one had to compare a vial of beer to a colored glass slide (with the naked eye).
SRM is ALMOST identical because they chose to measure SRM at a 420nm wavelength.
SRM=1.3546 x Lovibond - 0.76
EBC=SRM x 1.97 (or SRM=EBC x 0.508)
Therefor:
EBC = 1.97(1.3546 x Lovibond -0.76)
or
EBC = 2.66 x Lovibond - 1.5
And
Lovibond = EBC x 1/2.66 + 1.5/2.66
or
Lovibond = EBC x 0.375 + 0.56
Exactly what Weyermann said!
|
|
|
07-07-2010, 08:35 PM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alexandria, VA, USA
Posts: 2,058
Liked 20 Times on 19 Posts Likes Given: 5
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotr
I've found some sort of explanation of the phenomenon:
EBC controversy
"However many maltsters and brewers still, especially in the US, use and reference to the older SRM-EBC conversion. So for convenience and to avoid some problems the older EBC values were used – hard to break old habits"
Does it mean, that in USA you use differnent EBC's than in Europe?
|
The USA doesn't use EBC, we use SRM/Lovibond.
Europe has historically used 2 different EBC scales (IIRC, the newer one came about around 1991). You need to know which one is being used in order to know how to convert it.
__________________
On deck: Little Bo Pils, Bretta Off Dead (Brett pale)
Secondary: Oude Bruin, Red Sky at Morning (Sour brown ale)
On tap: Saison Duphunk (sour), Amarillo Slim (IPA), Earl White (ginger/bergamot wit)
Bottled: Number 8 (Belgian Strong Dark Ale), Eternale (Barleywine), Ancho Villa (Ancho/pasilla/chocolate/cinnamon RIS), Oak smoked porter (1/2 maple bourbon oaked, 1/2 apple brandy oaked)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|