Advertise Here
Main · BrewSpace · Recipes · Wiki · Groups · Clubs · Gallery · Reviews · Video · Blogs · Store

Memorial Day False Bottom Free ShippingUltra Portable Kits - $74.95, Kegconnection.com$69.99 Brand new 2.5 Gallon Keg Pre-Order
Go Back   Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Brew Science



Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-03-2012, 04:58 PM   #241
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Carmel, IN
Posts: 1,066
Default

I was formerly a consultant to AB's Jacksonville brewery and the American Lager profile is from that brewery. They use a nanofiltration process (essentially a coarse RO system) to process their relatively minerallized groundwater for their brewing uses. I was very surprised to see that this was the water they brew with, but they apparently don't add any additional calcium to the water for brewing since I would have detected it in the wastewater.

There are impacts from brewing with a water with low calcium, some good and some bad. Clearly, we know that Pilsen brewers use a low calcium water successfully and I know that AB does too. There are flavor benefits from the reduced mineralization in that there are fewer ions to color the beer flavor.

But, there is one aspect that can be troublesome to anyone without great cleaning practices...beerstone. The low calcium level does not provide the best opportunity to precipitate calcium oxalate during the mash. Therefore, the potential for beerstone formation is increased. I would have to say that AB probably has excellent clean-in-place machinery and procedures, so the opportunity for beerstone formation is significantly reduced. For homebrewers, that might not be the case. Thus the reason I recommend a minimum of 40 ppm Ca to help avoid beerstone formation in the first place.

The other reason to have a more elevated Ca content is to promote yeast health and flocculation. Considering that these major lager breweries are certainly pitching large yeast amounts so yeast health and yeast multiplication during the ferment may not be such an issue for them. These breweries also have sometimes elaborate fining methods and filtering, that solves the flocculation problem.

I can't say that I recommend either the Pilsen or American Lager water profiles, but I can't argue with the success of those beers and their fine and delicate flavor. I included the AB profile only because I had it and knew it was factual. If a brewer can deal with the potential limitations from brewing with low Ca water, then it should produce a more delicate flavored beer. Do be careful with taking this to the extreme since I have had beers made with straight RO or distilled water and I was not impressed with the lack of flavor.

Enjoy!


__________________
Martin Brungard, P.E. D.WRE
Carmel, IN
BJCP National
Foam Blowers of Indiana (FBI)
Brewing Water Information at:
https://sites.google.com/site/brunwater/
mabrungard is offline Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 05:43 PM   #242
Junior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6
Default

Thanks Martin.

I have said many times that us homebrewers are lucky because our "rock stars" are very accessible. I've been lucky enough to have conversations with Greg Noonan, Chris White, Chris Colby, John Palmer, Tess Szamatulski, Ray Daniels and others and I'm always impressed that they can respond to all of the correspondence they receive. I would put AJ and Martin in that group of "Accessible Rock Stars" to the homebrewing world. Thanks again for the insight.
kenlenard is offline Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2012, 06:20 PM   #243
Senior Member
 
Grinder12000's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Columbus WI
Posts: 2,879
Default

OK - I gotta say - I'm on page 5 and LOVING this whole topic!!! Could be worth a lifetime membership! Wait - I just paid for a year!! dang it!
__________________
Grinders Island Brewery - Pipeline (Batch #)

Secondary Kentucky Common(83)
Primary #1 Scottish Ale 70(84)
Primary #2 The Black Pearl Porter(85)
Grinder12000 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 01:05 PM   #244
Senior Member
 
Grinder12000's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Columbus WI
Posts: 2,879
Default

Define "British beers" and minerally beers. Where do Pale Ales and IPA's come into play???
__________________
Grinders Island Brewery - Pipeline (Batch #)

Secondary Kentucky Common(83)
Primary #1 Scottish Ale 70(84)
Primary #2 The Black Pearl Porter(85)
Grinder12000 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 01:25 PM   #245
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: .
Posts: 472
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grinder12000 View Post
Define "British beers" and minerally beers. Where do Pale Ales and IPA's come into play???
Post 156 hits on those.
__________________
I like a little more beer in my beer.
carrotmalt is offline Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 03:13 PM   #246
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: McLean/Ogden, Virginia/Quebec
Posts: 2,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grinder12000 View Post
Define "British beers"
Beers where the style originated in Great Britain, such as Pale Ales and IPAs but also Bitter, Mild, Burton Ales, Stout, Porter, Scottish Ales...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grinder12000 View Post
and minerally beers.
Beers where a high mineral content is part of the traditional profile i.e. where you taste the mineral quality in the finished beer. Export, Gose and Burton ales come to mind.
ajdelange is offline Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2012, 12:18 AM   #247
Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: missouri
Posts: 76
Default

On a 5 gallon 1.050 beer what would the equivilent of 3% acid malt be in 88% lactic acid?
bassmaster911 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2012, 03:49 AM   #248
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: McLean/Ogden, Virginia/Quebec
Posts: 2,287
Default

It's 3% of the grist weight so if you mashed 25 kg of malt 3% would be 750 grams of sauermalz. Sauermalz is generally considered to contain 2% lactic acid by weight so that 750 grams sauermalz would contain 15 grams of lactic acid. Lactic acid is generally sold as a solution which is 88% by weight so that 15/.88 = 17 grams of that solution would be needed. The density of an 88% solution is about 1.2 grams/cc so the 17 grams corresponds to 17/1.2 = 14.2 mL. Thus it looks like 14.2/25 = 0.568 mL per kg grist which is 0.258 mL per pound.
ajdelange is offline Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2012, 12:48 PM   #249
Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: missouri
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajdelange View Post
It's 3% of the grist weight so if you mashed 25 kg of malt 3% would be 750 grams of sauermalz. Sauermalz is generally considered to contain 2% lactic acid by weight so that 750 grams sauermalz would contain 15 grams of lactic acid. Lactic acid is generally sold as a solution which is 88% by weight so that 15/.88 = 17 grams of that solution would be needed. The density of an 88% solution is about 1.2 grams/cc so the 17 grams corresponds to 17/1.2 = 14.2 mL. Thus it looks like 14.2/25 = 0.568 mL per kg grist which is 0.258 mL per pound.
Thanks for the detailed explanation! Just to make sure I understand it equals about 1 ml per 4 pounds of grain.
bassmaster911 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2012, 12:59 PM   #250
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: McLean/Ogden, Virginia/Quebec
Posts: 2,287
Default

Yes.


ajdelange is offline Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question on Water Chemistry meschaefer Brew Science 7 11-02-2010 09:39 PM
My Water Chemistry Gremlyn Brew Science 18 02-17-2010 08:12 PM
Help: Water Chemistry - ppm vs mg/L carp Brew Science 2 10-10-2009 06:54 PM
water chemistry - adjust top-up water? JLem Brew Science 12 09-23-2009 12:11 AM
Water chemistry noob Yooper Brew Science 48 09-03-2009 07:21 PM





Contact Us - Top - Privacy - All times are GMT. The time now is 11:10 PM.
Copyright © Group Builder, Inc - All Rights Reserved
Craft Beer & Brewery Forum