 |
|
01-11-2012, 10:48 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 242
|
Berlinner weisse question
|
|
I am planning on putting together a Berliner weisse for this summer, and had a few quick questions about techniques for this brew... I am not planning on doing a sour mash, but rather fermenting the wort for about a week, then transferring it into a secondary with some lactobacillus to begin the souring. Since traditionally this is a no-boil type brew when doing a sour mash, is it really necessary to perform a boil with my wort?
Would it be possible/safe to simply go straight from the mash run (through my chiller) into a sanitized carboy? My thoughts are that this could make for a rather simple no sparge, no boil, quick brew day with a little mash hopping and simple lautering. Do I need to boil this brew or can I just mash, RDWHAHB, and let the beer happen?
|
|
|
01-12-2012, 12:55 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 63
|
You don't need to boil, but from my understanding you do want to bring it up close to boiling to sanitize. Also, it's fairly common to perform a decoction mash.
I'd also consider pitching lacto sooner rather than later. In fact, I'd give it a few days head start over the regular yeast.
|
|
|
01-12-2012, 02:36 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 242
|
Hmmm, I will take that into consideration. Thanks for that input!
However, one afterthought that I had, what about DMS? Should I worry about not boiling off any of the DMS by skipping the boil?
|
|
|
01-12-2012, 02:52 AM
|
#4
|
|
← Huge Member →
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: ☼ Clearwater, FL ☼
Posts: 9,692
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HollisBT
Hmmm, I will take that into consideration. Thanks for that input!
However, one afterthought that I had, what about DMS? Should I worry about not boiling off any of the DMS by skipping the boil?
|
DMS is produced during the boil. It is also removed during the boil. So if you don't boil, ...
But if you're going to add your own lacto culture (which I think is a good idea) you probably should raise the temp and kill off everything. Get it above 160 for 5 minutes and you are golden.

__________________
Nag Champa FTW. Mmmm.
|
|
|
01-12-2012, 05:14 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 242
|
So couldn't I theoretically do that with a mash out? If I mash out at 168 in my tun for about 15 minutes I should be good?
Also, what exactly is the mind-set behind pitching the lacto first? Just to let it establish itself? Should I pitch lacto and wait to see activity from it before pitching the yeast? And if that is the case, should I worry about oxygenation from mixing/swirling the wort once I pitch the yeast?
Also, since the yeast and bugs will be co-fermenting, do I need to worry about autoalysis (sp?) of any kind from being in the fermenter and on the trub for 5-6 months?
|
|
|
01-12-2012, 12:40 PM
|
#6
|
|
← Huge Member →
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: ☼ Clearwater, FL ☼
Posts: 9,692
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HollisBT
So couldn't I theoretically do that with a mash out? If I mash out at 168 in my tun for about 15 minutes I should be good?
Also, what exactly is the mind-set behind pitching the lacto first? Just to let it establish itself? Should I pitch lacto and wait to see activity from it before pitching the yeast? And if that is the case, should I worry about oxygenation from mixing/swirling the wort once I pitch the yeast?
Also, since the yeast and bugs will be co-fermenting, do I need to worry about autoalysis (sp?) of any kind from being in the fermenter and on the trub for 5-6 months?
|
Not really. You'll notice that that graph refers to "highest concentrations found in filtered beer". Your mash has an abundance of bacteria that would require a much longer period to kill to safe levels. I'm not a microbiologist so that's about the extent of my knowledge. Good luck!
__________________
Nag Champa FTW. Mmmm.
|
|
|
01-12-2012, 02:22 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 199
|
I boiled mine for 15 minutes. I also added the lacto 2 days before the sacc and it isn't sour at all now. Next time I'm going to do 3 or 4 days before the sacc.
|
|
|
01-12-2012, 02:43 PM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 969
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fritobandito
I boiled mine for 15 minutes. I also added the lacto 2 days before the sacc and it isn't sour at all now. Next time I'm going to do 3 or 4 days before the sacc.
|
When did you brew it?
__________________
Now here's a little something that you might not like. My DJ's name is Mix Master Mike.
|
|
|
01-12-2012, 03:35 PM
|
#9
|
|
← Huge Member →
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: ☼ Clearwater, FL ☼
Posts: 9,692
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fritobandito
I boiled mine for 15 minutes. I also added the lacto 2 days before the sacc and it isn't sour at all now. Next time I'm going to do 3 or 4 days before the sacc.
|
I have made 2 BW batches, and this was my experience both times. I think I'm done with the style - it beat me 
__________________
Nag Champa FTW. Mmmm.
|
|
|
01-12-2012, 03:50 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 346
|
Is it commonly understood that a Berliner Weisse must remain in primary for multiple months? I recently listened to a Basic Brewing podcast with Michael Tonsmire, and I think his beer was in primary for at least 2 months, and in this thread I'm seeing 5-6 months. Yet in Brewing Classic Styles, Jamil makes NO mention of an extended fermentation.
What's the scoop with souring? Should I brew a Berliner Weisse now if I want to drink it in the summer?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|