 |
|
06-06-2008, 01:02 AM
|
#1
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bee Cave, Texas
Posts: 11,971
|
Simpson's Peat Malt - anyone use it?
|
|
Would you call this Light Peated Malt or regular?
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 08:22 PM
|
#2
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bee Cave, Texas
Posts: 11,971
|
Bump........
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 08:24 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 11,900
|
I don't know it...I've only tried whatever peated malt AHS sells. JZ and JP have nothing but bad, bad things to say about peated malt in general, but I've had good results with the stuff I have.
__________________
MOSS HOLLOW BREWING CO.
Aristocratic Ales, Lascivious Lagers
.planned:
•Scottish 80/- •Sweet Stout •Roggenbier
.primary | bright:
98: Moss Hollow Soured '09 72: Oude Kriek 99: B-Weisse 102: Brett'd BDSA 104: Feat of Strength Helles Bock 105: Merkin Brown
.on tap | kegged:
XX: Moss Hollow Springs Sparkling Water 95: Gott Mit Uns German Pils 91b: Brown Willie's Oaked Abbey Ale 103: Merkin Stout
98: Yorkshire Special 100: Maple Porter 89: Cidre Saison 101: Steffiweizen '09 (#3)
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 09:18 PM
|
#4
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bee Cave, Texas
Posts: 11,971
|
I have a couple pounds and will use it to make a Stone Smoked Porter clone. Just looking for any feedback on it. I guess I'll go light. Stone only uses about 3% LPM (Lightly Peated Malt) but I think they use Baird's.
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 10:59 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sunny Southern Vermont
Posts: 2,403
|
I have been doing extensive research in formulating a recipe for a strong Scottish Ale. What I have found out is that a little peated malt goes a long way. 1% should be enough. 3% may be over the top. Like with any of specialty grain there can be a very delicate balance between what works, and what doesn't.
I was going to use it in my Strong Scottish Ale but decided to go with Weyermann's Rauch Malt instead. Seems it's a little bit more forgiving. Whatever you do have fun with it. Worst case it may need to age for awhile. 
Last edited by Glibbidy; 06-09-2008 at 11:01 PM.
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 11:03 PM
|
#6
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bee Cave, Texas
Posts: 11,971
|
Yep. The brewer said to be careful with it. They use 3% as theirs is "Lightly" peated. I think I'll drop mine down to 1.5% and give it a try.
I find that Rauch malt tends to have the aroma of BBQ while the peated reminds me of a wee scooter of a fine Islay scotch.
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 11:21 PM
|
#7
|
|
Burrowing Owl Brewery
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cape Coral Florida
Posts: 2,246
|
Ed, the smokey "wee scooter of a fine Islay scotch" taste comes from the yeast in a Scottish Ale. I'll send you one of my Smoked Porter( bottled yesterday, yummmy) to compare along with the Scottish for our RyePA swap.
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 01:29 AM
|
#8
|
|
Ichthyophagous Maximus
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Eagle, Idaho
Posts: 1,267
|
I recently had a problem with an AG brew kit (BTW, the person is a stand up business owner and sent replacement grains!), where the recipe called for 1/2 oz of peated malt, yet I was given 1/2 pound! The secondary tasted like sucking on silicone band-aids. I could not swallow the hydro sample.
I had an experienced brewmaster from a local brewhouse taste it and identified it as peated malt, and not an infection or chlorine.
Be very careful! Use it sparingly! This stuff is strong... ruined the beer!
Eric
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 01:58 AM
|
#9
|
|
Mmm...beer.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Southwest
Posts: 12,350
|
No surprise that your beer was ruined when you used 1,600% more of a strongly flavored ingredient than intended.
Though Scottish Ale depends on yeast (rather than peat) for some of its depth of flavor, Stone Smoked Porter does indeed use a small amount peated malt in the grain bill. Since that is the exact flavor that Ed is after, and since the amount is fairly well documented, the only question that remains is how this particular maltster's peated malt compares to the variety used by Stone. All other points are fairly moot.
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 02:10 AM
|
#10
|
|
Burrowing Owl Brewery
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cape Coral Florida
Posts: 2,246
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuri_Rage
No surprise that your beer was ruined when you used 1,600% more of a strongly flavored ingredient than intended.
Though Scottish Ale depends on yeast (rather than peat) for some of its depth of flavor, Stone Smoked Porter does indeed use a small amount peated malt in the grain bill. Since that is the exact flavor that Ed is after, and since the amount is fairly well documented, the only question that remains is how this particular maltster's peated malt compares to the variety used by Stone. All other points are fairly moot.
|
Well because Stone doesn't ship to Florida I don't know what their smoked porter tastes like, so that explains my error.
But if you do make it Ed save mine and compare head to head and let me know.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|