Advertise Here
Main · BrewSpace · Recipes · Wiki · Groups · Clubs · Gallery · Reviews · Video · Blogs

Some FREE Pumps to give away.17.99 Portable kegging faucet!$10.99 and $13.99 Ball Valve sale from Nor Cal Brewing Sol
Go Back   Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Recipes/Ingredients



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2009, 08:23 PM   #1
Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 36
Default Pitchable tube Vs Activator

The tube from white labs costs more. I'm assuming it's generally better. In your personal experience, which would you recommend?
Cheesepolp is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 08:29 PM   #2
More Humann than human
 
humann_brewing's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: the sun
Posts: 14,931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheesepolp View Post
The tube from white labs costs more. I'm assuming it's generally better. In your personal experience, which would you recommend?
Neither are suggested by most on here as directly pitchable unless you are doing like a 2.5 gallon batchs.

Check out the following link to get an idea of the count you will need.

Mr Malty Pitching Rate Calculator

As for a choice between the 2, well that is up to you to test out. I prefer WL but that is just me and also more accessible to me.
__________________
Fermenting: #54 Flanders Red 1.059 16 IBUS 12/22/11
#53 First sour 1.054 ~8 IBUs 12/15/11

Tapped: #47 RIS 1.088 7/10/11
#51 Mr Smokey Porter 1.063 11/2/11


aging: RIS 1.095 2/7/09, Imperial Porter 1.120 11/15/09, several meads, #47 RIS 1.088 7/10/11, #51 Mr Smokey Porter 1.063 11/2/11
humann_brewing is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 09:15 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
McGarnigle's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NYS
Posts: 1,538
Default

I like White Labs, but I wouldn't assume it's better just because it costs a bit more. I'm not even sure it costs more at all retailers.
McGarnigle is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 10:26 PM   #4
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 274
Default

I have been using white labs for my liquid yeast up until now. I have a wyeast pacman in a starter that I will be pitching on friday. This will be my first use of the smack pac. I have used dry yeast on my last two batches and am starting to like the cost/ease of use/good results so far. All of this means that to me it just a personal choice. All of them will make fine beer if your provide it a proper enviroment to do so. Get what you think is best for you beer and drive on!
__________________
Chisholm Trail Brewery
Thumper is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 10:36 PM   #5
Junior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10
Default

I used to use white labs tubes and I started to transition to the Wyeast smack packs. With the white labs you have to create a starter which requires forward thinking. The smack pack is your starter. I can wake up in the morning, smack the pack and by the time I am ready to pitch the pack is ready.

I haven't used a starter for the Wyeast pack and it has worked for me everytime.
weem25 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 10:50 PM   #6
More Humann than human
 
humann_brewing's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: the sun
Posts: 14,931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by weem25 View Post
I used to use white labs tubes and I started to transition to the Wyeast smack packs. With the white labs you have to create a starter which requires forward thinking. The smack pack is your starter. I can wake up in the morning, smack the pack and by the time I am ready to pitch the pack is ready.

I haven't used a starter for the Wyeast pack and it has worked for me everytime.
I use to do this until I got on this forum. There are plenty of threads out there on the subject, but here is one: The wyeast smack pack should not be considered a starter.

http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f39/first-brew-wyest-activator-starter-only-lme-best-option-122449/#post1363801

Though you may be getting good results with your method now, you could be getting Great results giving your wort the proper amount of yeast.
__________________
Fermenting: #54 Flanders Red 1.059 16 IBUS 12/22/11
#53 First sour 1.054 ~8 IBUs 12/15/11

Tapped: #47 RIS 1.088 7/10/11
#51 Mr Smokey Porter 1.063 11/2/11


aging: RIS 1.095 2/7/09, Imperial Porter 1.120 11/15/09, several meads, #47 RIS 1.088 7/10/11, #51 Mr Smokey Porter 1.063 11/2/11
humann_brewing is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 11:50 PM   #7
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Roseville, MI
Posts: 209
Default

This may seem sacrilegious, but I've found that the White Labs tubes are pitcahable in 5g of wort, and I've pitched smack packs right into 5g of wort too and they both attenuated just fine.

I honestly prefer dry yeast and only use liquid if I really need to tweak a beer with a liquid strain. In this brewers opinion, unless you're doing more than 5 gallons at a time or making some higher gravity beers, I can't think of a reason to make a starter if you stick with liquid... To answer your question, in my experience, both White labs and Wyeast have yield quality results, get the one best suits your brewing needs. If you find two similar strains, go with the cheaper one I like Whitelabs though, dont have to worry about "smacking the pack", just let it warm up, shake and then pour it into your wort. Viola! You made beer.

Not to hi-jack, but a local 7bbl microbrewery uses Safale dry yeast exclusively and the brewer pitches at most 2 packets directly into the wort... no re hydrating/proofing, certainly no starters. Lets not forget that yeast is a living thing and given favorable conditions, it will reproduce as needed.
__________________

Primary: Empty :(
Secondary: (I don't believe in secondaries)
Keg #1: The Pilsen Ale!
Keg #2: Sherwood Brewing Co. Irish Stout
On Deck: American Brown
hoplobster is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 12:26 AM   #8
Moderator
 
EdWort's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bee Cave, Texas
Posts: 11,937
Blog Entries: 2
Default

I like both and make starters for both.
EdWort is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 12:40 AM   #9
Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elk Grove Ca.
Posts: 69
Default

White Labs is clearly better.

Read this
KevinP is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 12:43 AM   #10
Doe Re Mi Beer
 
schweaty's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Glass City
Posts: 1,950
Default

I started using Wyeast but have since switched to White Labs. They both have the same types of yeasts under a different name. Below is a link to a good resource comparing the two and telling you which are used in commercial beers.

Yeast Strains
schweaty is offline Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yeast ..... smack pack vs pitchable tube? Trooper-Orange Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 22 08-08-2009 05:27 PM
HELP! first time using white labs pitchable liquid yeast! underagebrewmeister54 General Beer Discussion 5 06-29-2009 11:52 PM
Directly pitchable yeast. lowend Extract Brewing 25 02-19-2009 10:06 AM
pitchable yeast Mapleroots Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 5 12-11-2008 08:57 PM
SS braid, copper tube, bazooka tube??? Joetuo Equipment/Sanitation 12 10-26-2007 02:58 AM





Contact Us - Top - Privacy - All times are GMT. The time now is 03:34 PM.
Copyright © Group Builder, Inc - All Rights Reserved