Quote:
Originally Posted by sundowner
I don't mean this to be disrespectful in any way, but find another recipe. I have a wonderful smoked porter designed along the lines of Alaskan Smoked Porter.
You'll find that it's much easier to add something to a recipe than to take a bad ingredient out.
I wouldn't even consider using 3lbs of peated malt. I don't use it at all. I suppose it falls under the category of 'different strokes for different folks'
Good luck
|
Agreed, way too much going on. Peat smoked malt can yield very tasty results when used right (Hair of the Dog Adam, Stone Smoked Porter etc…) but when you use too much the descriptors range from acrid to creosote. I just did a 3.5 gallon batch with .5 lbs of peat smoked malt, it was a big beer and I am planning on letting it age for at least 6 months, but at the moment it is still too smoky for me.
I would just go for 2-3 lbs of Weyermann’s rauchmalt, it gives more of a campfire/sausage sort of smoke, much more mellow.
If you are married to the mole idea, I’ll offer a few suggestions. I have had the best luck getting chocolate with cocoa powder, it has had most of the fat removed so there is less chance of an oil slick killing your head retention (I like to mix it with some hot water and then add it to the secondary).
I have not used chiles, but I would lower the amount (a couple dried specimines should be plenty), you can always add more if you need more heat.
I would drop the raisons, it takes a lot to get a flavor impact (even 1 lb in 10 gallons didn’t give us any recognizable flavor), and you have plenty going on already. Same goes for the honey, after it ferments out you just won’t notice that small amount in such a complex beer.
I tend to opt for clean yeasts when I do complex/weird ingredient additions, so I would go for 1056/001, but that’s just me.
Hope that helps good luck.