 |
|
09-06-2009, 08:30 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 3,469
Liked 23 Times on 15 Posts
|
Anyone ever use Whitelabs 051 California Ale V?
|
|
My buddy works at a LHBS that's not so local. It's about 50 miles away. He gets me 30% off so when he's coming to town he brings me supplies. I asked for a vial of WL 001 and he accidently brought me 051 (California V). I've never used the yeast but reading the bio it makes me wonder what's up with it.
Here's the page from White Labs.
"From Northern California. This strain is more fruity than WLP001, and slightly more flocculent. Attenuation is lower, resulting in a fuller bodied beer than with WLP001."
Anyone had success or have notes about this yeast?

__________________
play the bass, brew the beer
What's tappening? :D
|
|
|
09-06-2009, 09:07 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 1,634
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
I used this yeast in an MO/Amarillo SMaSH. Note that it was an old vial, so I made a starter from it. Didn't attenuate well, I think it stopped at 1.021 or somewhere close and had this god awful taste to it. With this beer being a SMaSH the only thing I could come up with was the yeast. I read reviews were people said it put off a lot of sulfur, I would definately have to agree. The beer was undrinkable and I had to dump it.
This is just my experience with it.
__________________
staygoldBREWING
Primary: RIS, Flanders Red, Berliner Weisse
On Tap: Brown Ale, American Stout, Pumpkin Porter, Pale Ale, Uncle Muscle's IPA, Rowsdower Canadian Dry Stout
Bottled: Berliner Weisse
I think you are confuisng circle k with a reach around. - Denny's Evil Concoctions
|
|
|
09-06-2009, 09:17 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 3,469
Liked 23 Times on 15 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chefchris
I used this yeast in an MO/Amarillo SMaSH. Note that it was an old vial, so I made a starter from it. Didn't attenuate well, I think it stopped at 1.021 or somewhere close and had this god awful taste to it. With this beer being a SMaSH the only thing I could come up with was the yeast. I read reviews were people said it put off a lot of sulfur, I would definately have to agree. The beer was undrinkable and I had to dump it.
This is just my experience with it.
|
I just put the starter in the fridge and it smelled really sulfury. Starters always smell funky and you can't really trust the smell test with starters but I think I'm doing an IPA with it tomorrow and hopefully it'll be great.
__________________
play the bass, brew the beer
What's tappening? :D
|
|
|
09-06-2009, 10:10 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 892
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts
|
Never used it, but i have heard it gives off fruity tones.
__________________
"Retail is for suckers."
|
|
|
09-07-2009, 02:07 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Willamina & Oak Grove, Oregon, USA
Posts: 25,618
Liked 108 Times on 103 Posts
|
I've done IPAs with it and liked the results. The fruity notes go well with PNW hopping.
__________________
Remember one unassailable statistic, as explained by the late, great George Carlin: "Just think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of them are even stupider!"
"I would like to die on Mars, just not on impact." Elon Musk
|
|
|
09-07-2009, 03:06 PM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 389
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
|
It's the strain Anchor uses for Liberty, their IPA, so I would expect great things if it's handled well. I have a vial in my refridgerator that I'm planning to use for an Amber ale.
|
|
|
09-07-2009, 03:43 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 64
|
I used it in a batch of Centennial Blonde, my first all-grain. It REEKED during fermentation though. My sisters' text to me at the time: "Your beer is making the closet smell like rotting eggs." But it turned out plenty tasty.
|
|
|
09-07-2009, 04:48 PM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: KY
Posts: 2,613
Liked 8 Times on 6 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
There's speculation that Bell's ale yeast is Wyeast 1272 / WLP051. I don't know for sure that that's true, but I suspect it is.
I've been using cultured Bell's ale yeast for my past several IPAs and it does impart a little bit of a fruity flavor that I like in IPAs. Haven't noticed any sulfur during fermentation.
Anyway, my point in posting this is that if WLP051 / Wy1272 is in fact the same yeast as Bell's ale yeast, I wouldn't hesitate to use it (if you like a fruity note in whatever it is you're brewing).
Last edited by Rick500; 09-07-2009 at 04:50 PM.
|
|
|
09-08-2009, 05:11 PM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 23
|
I use it for my APAs. I like it, it produces a fuller body than 001, but without the amount of esters you would expect from english or other strains with lesser attenuation. It is a good idea to let it ferment in a location far from your daily whereabouts, though, as it can throw off a lot of sulphuric smells (think the day after binge drinking hefes). I have never had any problems with sulphur after finished fermentation
|
|
|
09-10-2009, 06:20 PM
|
#10
|
|
Be good to your yeast...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pflugerville, Texas
Posts: 5,431
Liked 33 Times on 29 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
This strain I have used for APA, Blonde, Irish Red, and Cream Ale. It's fairly clean at 66*F, and a lot more flocculant than WLP001. A good general purpose clean ale yeast.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|