 |
|
08-07-2009, 02:37 PM
|
#321
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 60
|
The only problem I see w/ either of those recipes is the amount of sugar. I think that needs to be scalable too so people aren't putting 3# in a 2.5gal batch. Or at least state what size batch 3# is for.
__________________
KegCapTap.com The perfect tap handle for every keg
|
|
|
08-07-2009, 02:47 PM
|
#322
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,815
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpanishCastleAle
Everybody keeps asking for a definitive, 'final' recipe. So I think we need to state one and then if anyone has any problems with it, speak up now or forever hold your peace.
The latest 'BGSA' recipe was:
94% Pils
3% Munich
3% Wheat malt
approx. 3# cane sugar
1.100 OG
1.010 FG
50 IBU with a decent amount of flavor/aroma hops.
predicted SRM = ~5
The latest 'Belgian Specialty Ale' recipe was:
73% Pils
13.5% Munich
13.5% Wheat malt
approx. 3# cane sugar
1.100 OG
1.010 FG
52 IBU with some flavor/aroma hops
predicted SRM = ~8.75
Is there a preference between these two?
I slightly prefer the 'BGSA' recipe just because I keep reading that these brews are all about Pils/yeast. However, we are already out of the style guideline so I can understand the desire to further deviate.
|
I also prefer the BGSA.
|
|
|
08-07-2009, 03:03 PM
|
#323
|
|
Poser
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 15,154
|
I'm for either, really, but partial to the Golden Strong Ale.
Depending on which we go with, I may partigyle a Specialty Ale off of the BGSA's grist and include that in my packages as well. 
__________________
White Dog Aleworks and Drafthouse
|
|
|
08-07-2009, 03:07 PM
|
#324
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,815
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hodor_Baggins
The only problem I see w/ either of those recipes is the amount of sugar. I think that needs to be scalable too so people aren't putting 3# in a 2.5gal batch. Or at least state what size batch 3# is for.
|
Yeah, would probably be better to state the sugar as a percentage also.
I think the BGSA would then become something like:
80.5% Pilsner
3% Munich
3% Wheat
13.5% sugar.
Which for my 10 gallon calculations works out to:
Code:
StrangeBrew J v.2.0.1 recipe text output
Details:
Name: 10-10-10 Belgian Golden Strong
Brewer: Chris Miller
Size: 10.0 gallons US
Style: Belgian Golden Strong Ale
OG: 1.100, FG:1.010, Alc:12.0, IBU:36.3
(Alc method: by Volume; IBU method: Tinseth)
Yeast: Wyeast 3739-PC Flanders Golden Ale
Fermentables:
Name amount units pppg lov %
Munich Light 1.12 lb 1.033 8.0 3.0%
Pils 2-Row 30.00 lb 1.035 1.2 80.5%
Wheat Malt 1.12 lb 1.039 1.7 3.0%
White Cane Sugar (Gran) 5.00 lb 1.042 0.0 13.4%
plus clearly there is a rounding error showing up in my software since that only adds up to 99.9%.
|
|
|
08-07-2009, 03:18 PM
|
#325
|
|
Poser
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 15,154
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by camiller
plus clearly there is a rounding error showing up in my software since that only adds up to 99.9%.
|
The last 10th is an offering to the Beer gods to petition for a good outcome. Something like the "angel's share" in ages past.

__________________
White Dog Aleworks and Drafthouse
|
|
|
08-07-2009, 04:05 PM
|
#326
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,184
|
I vote BGSA with a % put on the sugar, especially since I've never added any to the brew. Does that go in to the boil or fermentor?
__________________
Barefoot Brewery
Primary: German Alt
Bottled: Kolch, German Hefeweizen
On tap: 60/- Light Scottish Ale
|
|
|
08-07-2009, 04:10 PM
|
#327
|
|
Beer is Good. And stuff!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 723
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacksonbrown
I vote BGSA with a % put on the sugar, especially since I've never added any to the brew. Does that go in to the boil or fermentor?
|
I've put it in the boil in the past, but I am planning to add the sugar to the fermenter for this one. I'm planning to wait until high krausen and then add some or all of the sugar. I haven't decided whether I will do it incrementally or all at once.
I'm going to brew this on Sunday since I need to rack my Belgian Pale Ale off the yeast cake.
__________________
Uff Da Picobrewery
Primary:
Secondary:
Kegged: Jarl Pils (Noble Pils Clone), Erik the Red Ale, Yuletide CarØl, West Coast Red, Saison Dans L'Abime (Black Saison), Belgian Blonde
Bottled: Yule Gruit, Unhallowed BGSA (10-10-10), Nymphetamine Barleywine (999)
|
|
|
08-07-2009, 05:37 PM
|
#328
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 3,280
|
I'll be adding sugar to the primary at the peak of fermentation too, in hopes the lower OG the yeast are pitched into, and letting them reproduce and eat a bunch of the complex sugars before being exposed to the simple sugar lets them attenuate the full 90%.
__________________
I'm too lazy and have too many beers going to keep updating this!
|
|
|
08-07-2009, 07:12 PM
|
#329
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,815
|
Any thoughts on water chemistry for this masterpiece? I know my local tap water is not really suited for paler colored beers so I'm looking at diluting tap water with distilled water(50/50) then adding back 6 grams of Calcium Chloride and 6 grams gypsum. That would give me a RA of -25 and a Chloride/Sulfate ratio of 98/151. That puts me in the appropriate color range (3-8 SRM) and the Chloride/Sulfate ratio is appropriate for a moderately bitter beer.
Any other thoughts?
|
|
|
08-07-2009, 07:54 PM
|
#330
|
|
Poser
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 15,154
|
You'll want a fairly soft water profile for this beer. Not necessarily Pilsen soft but soft.
Beer Smith lists Antwerp, Belgium for the Belgian water profile style with the following numbers...
Calcium: 90.0 ppm
Sulfate: 84.0 ppm
Magnesium: 11.0 ppm
Chloride: 57.0 ppm
Sodium: 37.0 ppm
Bicarbonate: 76.0 ppm
PH: 8.0
__________________
White Dog Aleworks and Drafthouse
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|