 |
|
07-11-2008, 12:06 AM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 233
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Is a wide stainless pot not suitable for brewing?
|
|
Hello all,
My dad just found a good deal on a 10-gal stockpot @ a restraunt supply store...it is less tall and alot wider than alot of pots sold for brewing. Is this going to present a problem for brewing with the pot? With my MLT built I am eager to begin my first AG brew but I can wait if this pot may not work.
best,
RJ
|
|
|
07-11-2008, 12:14 AM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lesotho
Posts: 4,777
Liked 15 Times on 14 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
If you can fit it on a stove top, itll be fine. You will get some extra loss to evaporation since there is going to be a larger surface area, but you can compensate for that in your recipe.
|
|
|
07-11-2008, 12:40 AM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 233
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
I have an outdoor propane cooker, so the stove top is not a problem.
|
|
|
07-11-2008, 06:34 AM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 3,544
Liked 13 Times on 12 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
eh, IME, SS is slow as **** to bring the wort to a boil. I got rid of my keggle because it was a slow piece of ****. But hey if it's cheap go for it.
|
|
|
07-11-2008, 06:56 AM
|
#5
|
|
control freak
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 175
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
It's a common misconception that brewpots need to be tall and skinny. I think it mostly just comes from looking at other peoples brew systems, and/or the shape of a keggle. But if you look at any large liquid vessels for boiling in industry (industrial and/or restaurants), you'll find them not tall and skinny, rather short and wide. This is for good reason, namely heat efficiency. Plus, if it's too tall and skinny, you may not even be able to get a boil going, see this Thead
In my book, for homebrewing, wider means that you boil off more, which means you can sparge more, which = better efficiency.
Of course if we're talking MLT, you could argue tall and skinny may be better.
|
|
|
07-11-2008, 06:58 AM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Grand Ledge, Mich
Posts: 2,539
Liked 6 Times on 5 Posts
|
I would rather have a shorter fatter pot, It gives you more room to stir your IC around with.
__________________
OUTLAW ALES
Kegged/Bottled: Boston Lager Clone, Crimson Ale, Guiness Draught Clone, Kilt Warmer Scotch Ale, BBB Blonde Ale, Oberon Clone Pt. 1,000
Do I Look Like A Man.....With A Plan??
Local Home Brew Store
www.theredsalamander.com
|
|
|
07-11-2008, 01:58 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 4,564
Liked 30 Times on 30 Posts
|
The only reason a lot of people use tall skinny pots is because thats what is sold with the burner as a "turkey fryer" setup. Ideally I would use shorter and fatter. You have less chance of a boil over.
|
|
|
07-11-2008, 04:50 PM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Newnan, Georgia
Posts: 1,925
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by z987k
eh, IME, SS is slow as **** to bring the wort to a boil. I got rid of my keggle because it was a slow piece of ****. But hey if it's cheap go for it.
|
Most good quality pots will have an aluminum clad bottom to spread the heat more evenly and reduce hotspots. But since Keggles were never meant for or as a cooking vessel they don't. The bottom of the keggle is rounded slightly which may also contribute to a loss of effeciency. Also rather than the bottom sitting flat on the burner a keggle is raised by the sides of the barrel. Keggles aren't good pots they are just cheap.
If you found a good deal on a good SS pot grab it fast. The wider the better.

__________________
Do what you like!
Brew what you like!
|
|
|
07-11-2008, 04:57 PM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 116
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
|
Wider is better. You can fit a bigger burner under them, more even heat distribution, more stable, less chance of boil over.
|
|
|
07-11-2008, 09:36 PM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 428
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul_h
Wider is better. You can fit a bigger burner under them, more even heat distribution, more stable, less chance of boil over.
|
+1 to this.
Also, the wider a cooking vessel, the more efficient your heating element is going to be intially. If you take a very narrow, very tall pot for example, and put it over a full flame burner, and the burner flames lick significantly around your pot, you're loosing heat. Even with a normal sized pot, when you turn on the flame, you'll feel a wave of high heat work it's way around the pot. With a particularly wide pot, especially in the beginning, you'll have far cooler air moving up the sides of the pot. This means that more BTUs are being absorbed into the pot, which leads to faster heat transfer into the water.
However, this can work against you. Too wide, and the outside edges of your pot don't get heated. You loose heat here later on. I think with a propane burner you'll be alright though.
__________________
I never did like to do anything simple when I could do it ass-backwards...
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|