 |
|
06-26-2011, 09:00 PM
|
#21
|
|
Me likes me beer
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melrose, MA
Posts: 1,429
Liked 18 Times on 16 Posts Likes Given: 23
|
When I'm at my computer later tonight I'll shoot it over.
|
|
|
06-27-2011, 12:18 AM
|
#23
|
|
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: "Detroitish" Michigan
Posts: 40,525
Liked 2349 Times on 1440 Posts Likes Given: 3170
|
Every year or so someone starts a thread like this, and it never seems to pan out. So I hope you are more successful. But you might want to read through some of the other threads, there were some ideas about the bottom valve issue.
__________________
Like my snazzy new avatar? Get Sons of Zymurgy swag, here, and brew with the best.
Revvy's one of the cool reverends. He has a Harley and a t-shirt that says on the back "If you can read this, the bitch was Raptured. - Madman
I gotta tell ya, just between us girls, that Revvy is HOT. Very tall, gorgeous grey hair and a terrific smile. He's very good looking in person, with a charismatic personality... he drives like a ****ing maniac! - YooperBrew
|
|
|
06-27-2011, 12:36 AM
|
#24
|
|
AHA Member
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 11,952
Liked 433 Times on 391 Posts Likes Given: 266
|
Any suggestions on what to search under? Don't see anything in the bottom links. If someone else has done some of the design work already, if might make it easier.
I'm not one to give up easily. It might come down to finding the right place to make the first few and then go from there.
__________________
My RocketHub Project
Hopping Tango Brewery
跟猴子比丟屎 ・ Gun HOE-tze bee DIO-se
On Tap: Caramel Ale, Mocha Porter II, MO SMaSH IPA
Waiting/Carbonating: 12.5% Wee Honey II, 8.9% Old Ale, English Brown Ale, Lickah ESB, Mocha Porter II
Fermenting
K1: MO SMaSH IPA
K2:
K3: TripSix
On Deck: Caramel Ale
Aging:mead
Mead [bottled]:Oaked Wildflower Traditional, Mocha Madness, Blackberry Melomel, maple wine
...the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
|
|
|
06-27-2011, 12:45 AM
|
#25
|
|
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: "Detroitish" Michigan
Posts: 40,525
Liked 2349 Times on 1440 Posts Likes Given: 3170
|
You didn't try searching for threads titled Stainless Steel Auto Siphon ?
Or this one?
The first one has some good info. The second one has a couple pics by swagman of an actual build of one he did.
__________________
Like my snazzy new avatar? Get Sons of Zymurgy swag, here, and brew with the best.
Revvy's one of the cool reverends. He has a Harley and a t-shirt that says on the back "If you can read this, the bitch was Raptured. - Madman
I gotta tell ya, just between us girls, that Revvy is HOT. Very tall, gorgeous grey hair and a terrific smile. He's very good looking in person, with a charismatic personality... he drives like a ****ing maniac! - YooperBrew
|
|
|
06-27-2011, 04:29 AM
|
#26
|
|
Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Plainfield, IL
Posts: 84
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DakotaRules
I would like to see a 1/2" version and like everyone else said a silicone tubing and seals would be great. I use 1/2" silicone for everything.
|
This and the other concerns everyone has expressed in the thread. I love my auto-siphon, but man, you drop that thing a foot and it cracks. I typically go through about two a year for this reason. Would love to see a stainless version available.
__________________
Primary 1: EdWort's Apfelwine
Primary 2: Yooper's Fizzy Yellow Beer
Primary 3: Surly Cynic
Bottled/Kegged: EdWort's Apfelwein, DC's BVIP, DFH 120 Minute Clone, Gratetful Dead Guy
|
|
|
06-27-2011, 04:51 AM
|
#27
|
|
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,527
Liked 333 Times on 273 Posts Likes Given: 25
|
You know they have a patent on the design of the autosiphon, right?
That is why there isn't a SS one available commercially. Or a competitor to the existing one, even.
|
|
|
06-27-2011, 05:17 AM
|
#28
|
|
Señor Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 10,708
Liked 2370 Times on 2320 Posts Likes Given: 15
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by weirdboy
You know they have a patent on the design of the autosiphon, right?
That is why there isn't a SS one available commercially. Or a competitor to the existing one, even.
|
Not according to the US patent office. There is a similar patent from 1977 (expired), but nothing for that design. This has already been discussed in the threads Revvy linked above.
|
|
|
06-27-2011, 06:09 AM
|
#29
|
|
Lorem Ipsum Dolor Sit Amet
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,439
Liked 1494 Times on 1411 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by orangehero
|
Definitely, but durability is only a small point for some of us - although I'm sure with the rate people seem to have to replace them, it would likely pay for itself *eventually*for many, if not most people.
But mostly, I've gone to significant costs to making sure the only materials touching my wort/beer are stainless steel, silicone, and glass (the ONLY exceptions, out of necessity, being autosiphons, my pump, and a sintered stone for dissolving O2 into my wort.) But the O2 stone can be boiled, and I sanitize my pump by recirculating boiling wort before cooling/transferring it into my fermenter, and recirculating a boiling oxyclean solution afterwards.
So the autosiphon is quite literally my most vulnerable piece of equipment by far, with regards to infections and spreading them. The durability would help with this somewhat, by not allowing small cracks and scratches to easily form and harbor bacteria, but stainless and silicone also have some other properties making them much more sanitary. The lack of porosity makes it incredibly difficult to harbor bacteria, much easier to clean *perfectly*, and a breeze to sanitize. The ability to even boil the thing in a large enough pot (you'd really only need boiling water to cover half of it, and just flip it upside down to get the other half) would also be fantastic.
You see, some people say that if you brew sours, you should really have two sets of all the plastic equipment - one for normal beers, one for beers with bugs - in order to help prevent infections due to cross-contamination. Even I have often said it, but I still don't find it ideal. For instance, I have a Lambic and a Berliner Weisse in fermentors right now. In case you're unaware, Berliner Weisse uses ONLY brewer's yeast and lactobacillus, while Lambic uses pretty much everything. Having only one autosiphon for sours means risking the contamination of a beer like a Berliner Weisse with, as I said, pretty much everything. Why does it deserve being exposed any more than my non-lacto beers? I've also recently acquired an oak barrel in which I'll be using for Flanders Reds, and picked up all 3 White Labs May/June platinum collection yeasts, which in addition to Belgian Wit 2, includes the Orval strain (which I'll be using to make an Orval clone) and the new American Farmhouse Blend. That's 3 more beers with bugs, and so pretty soon I'll have a total of 5 such beers all going at (or around) the same time, not to mention I'll obviously be brewing others in the future as well.
Again, current practice is to share one autosiphon between all these brews, even though they can still infect each other the same way they can infect "normal beers". Granted, the high acidity many of these develop can make them more resilient, especially as the beers continue to acidify over time, but they are by no means infection-proof, not to mention that, although I generally stick to primaries only, many of these beers require quite a long time to ferment and thus should be secondaried, whick requires racking (and thus exposing) them fairly young - the big exception being lambic, which specifically should not be secondaried even if fermenting/bulk conditioning for 3 years or longer. Although as mentioned before, lambic is inoculated with pretty much everything, so that one is mainly problematic as a large source of possible infections.
But despite the fact that sours don't deserve unintended infections any more than normal beers IMO, it's unreasonable to own an autosiphon for normal beers, and then one for every single sour I brew. Right now I'd be looking at having to own six, and buying even more every time I decide to brew a new kind. And that's not even taking into account how often these need to be replaced.
But just because I stick with just a couple autosiphons right now doesn't mean I find it to be anywhere near ideal. I would pay a fair chunk of change to have a high quality, durable, and sanitary autosiphon made of stainless and silicone in a heartbeat. If you compare it to buying so many autosiphons as I outlined, just a single one would still be the more sanitary solution, AND wouldn't take long to be the cheaper solution too. In fact, unless you abuse the heck out of the thing, it should be sufficiently durable that, given enough time, it ought to be cheaper than buying - and inevitably replacing, repeatedly - even just 1 or 2 plastic ones.
So yeah... I would much rather own one of these, even at a significantly higher cost, than going with your brilliant idea, TYVM.
|
|
|
06-27-2011, 06:40 AM
|
#30
|
|
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,527
Liked 333 Times on 273 Posts Likes Given: 25
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuanMoore
Not according to the US patent office. There is a similar patent from 1977 (expired), but nothing for that design. This has already been discussed in the threads Revvy linked above.
|
That's because the company that designed the autosiphon is a Canadian company. The patents are registered in Canada, and the US and Canada share IP rights across the border thanks to NAFTA, among other agreements.
They print the respective patent numbers on the package, even. Or, at least they used to when I got mine.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|