Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Equipment/Sanitation > Rubbermaid Cooler Materials ID solved!!!




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2010, 10:42 PM   #1
I say, lookey here son...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
brewtus_'s Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 159
Liked 11 Times on 7 Posts
Likes Given: 7

Default Rubbermaid Cooler Materials ID solved!!!

This new thread is in response to the "Rubbemaid No" thread posted by Hex (http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f11/rubbermaid-says-no-203227/. I thought it made sense to start a new thread in case anyone is interesed in this info and didn't plan on returning to the old thread.

So last night after my "chemistry lesson" on plastics, everyone still had some questions regarding the materials making the mash tun. Is it HDPE, LDPE, PP, LLDPE or MDPE? Turns out it's none of them!!!!

My mash tun sacrificed some small shavings from itself in the name of science to identify it's composition. I took the samples into the lab for chemical analysis. My cooler is a Rubbermaid 1655, 7 gallon, manufactured September 2007. Here are the results:

>Lid: HDPE

>Orange plastic on outside: HDPE

>White plastic on inside: Modified polypropylene copolymer (i.e. Dow Engage 8450, 8540 or similar resin). The melting point is somewhere between 100 and 110 deg C, which would make it fine for mashing, just don't pour boiling water (100C) in it or it may deform. This type of material is often used in car panels or bumpers where you need a rigid plastic but also need it to "give" some so that it does not shatter when banged into, especially at low temperatures.

Wait, there's a "7" on the bottom of the cooler! It can't be HDPE! Yes it can. There's a "7" on the bottom because the cooler istelf is composed of at least three layers of different polymers - the HDPE orange part, the PP copolymer and the insulating layer inside (urethane? foamed styrene? not sure since I don't feel like destroying the cooler to find out). The recycling number "7" is applied when the finished good has multiple layers and/or multiple blends of different polymers in it's composition. When discarded, the entire cooler is considered for recycling, not each of its individual parts. Number 7's are often thrown out at the recycling center since they are not "pure" materials.

Warning: Science below!

This is concerning the white portion only. It would have been ideal situation to determine melting points and glass transition temperatures to get a better ID, but a differential scanning calorimeter is required for that, and mine happens to be broken. So I just used infrared spectroscopy to ID the plastic. I needed to get the plastic into a thin film for analysis, so that required melting it and pressing it out. I started at 100C, and it softened but did not melt all the way. Mission accomplished at 110C. If this were PP, it would have melted at 160C (or perhaps 130C if it were syndiotactic). So I knew it wasn't PP. Then I actually took the sample to the spectrometer, and the results showed a infrared spectrum matching PP. But wait, there was also the indication of some PE present. I then realized that this had to be a PE modified PP copolymer. This makes sense since the PE portion lowers the crystallinity of the PP giving better low temperature properties (this is supposed to be a cooler after all). HDPE would not be ideal at below freezing temps, and LDPE is too elastomeric. A modified PP copolymer gives a rigid material with better low temp properties.

I have the FTIR data saved as a picture, but have no way of posting it. Can someone give me a hand with it?

The lid and orange parts were easily ID'd by the same methods. There is the indication that there may be some UV stabilizers in the orange portion.

I would have like to have done more, but I only had an extremely small sample size (only a few milligrams) and didn't want to kill my mash tun completely.

Cheers!


brewtus_ is offline
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-04-2010, 10:46 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9,101
Liked 145 Times on 139 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

And I already threw mine out.


wildwest450 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-04-2010, 10:50 PM   #3
DINAB
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
arturo7's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 8,770
Liked 65 Times on 58 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

excellent work, brewtus
__________________
Hey, knock that shvt off. We're drinkin' here.
arturo7 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-04-2010, 10:53 PM   #4
Hex
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ruhstaller Beer Sacramento
Posts: 1,012
Liked 11 Times on 11 Posts
Likes Given: 20

Default

Good job, but your only half way finished with your part of the experiment (if you choose to accept the mission).

And someone else here may be able to help to keep your costs down.

Get two samples of water, one taken from 170f water before, and one sample of 170f water after one hour in water cooler.

Post results of your findings in Parts Per (?) here on this thread.

Cheers.
Hex is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-04-2010, 10:53 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 239
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Brewtus...

YOU FREAKIN' ROCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I owe you a homebrew or 6.
Thanks so much for taking the time & effort to do this.
tunoffun is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-04-2010, 10:57 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 2,089
Liked 25 Times on 25 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

That's great but just because it won't melt doesn't mean it won't leach. We already knew it wouldn't melt. I don't mean to disturb the sh!t on this again but we were arguing about negative health effects, not whether it would melt. Thanks for determining the type of plastic though. At least we know that. Good work!
JonK331 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-04-2010, 10:59 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 239
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hex View Post
Good job, but your only half way finished with your part of the experiment (if you choose to accept the mission).

And someone else here may be able to help to keep your costs down.

Get two samples of water, one taken from 170f water before, and one sample of 170f water after one hour in water cooler.

Post results of your findings in Parts Per (?) here on this thread.

Cheers.
Damn man... kind of an unappreciative attitude considering the trouble he went through to answer your question when everyone else was chucking stones at you.

BTW - Ever stop to think that maybe water (oh - and should that be tap, deionized, or distilled?) might not be a good indicator of what might happen when an acidic wort is used in its stead?

And PPM of what? What exactly should he be looking for?

I don't think you have the background to be suggesting test methods.
tunoffun is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-04-2010, 11:14 PM   #8
I say, lookey here son...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
brewtus_'s Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 159
Liked 11 Times on 7 Posts
Likes Given: 7

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hex View Post
Good job, but your only half way finished with your part of the experiment (if you choose to accept the mission).

And someone else here may be able to help to keep your costs down.

Get two samples of water, one taken from 170f water before, and one sample of 170f water after one hour in water cooler.

Post results of your findings in Parts Per (?) here on this thread.

Cheers.
What analytes would you be interested in? Heavy metals (Pb, Hg, Cd, etc.), polyaromatic hydrocarbons, halogens, phthalates, BPA or some other boogie man chemicals that everyone seems to be scared of? And at what sensitivity (pph, ppm, ppb)? What exactly are we afraid of leaching out of the plastic and into our beer?

It would make more sense to first see if any of the analytes of interest are even in the plastic first before determining if they would even leach out.

Look at the report from the water company and see what's in your water, because you're adding that to your beer as well. Even distilled water from the store has non desireable stuff in it at the ppm level. Unless you're willing to pay $$$$$, you're not getting "pure" water.
brewtus_ is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-04-2010, 11:18 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 2,089
Liked 25 Times on 25 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

Why not just say "I don't want to know if anything leaches from the plastic that could have negative health effects because I like using a cooler and I'm not going to change anyway."
JonK331 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-04-2010, 11:23 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 239
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonK331 View Post
Why not just say "I don't want to know if anything leaches from the plastic that could have negative health effects because I like using a cooler and I'm not going to change anyway."
Who are you addressing?


tunoffun is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Breqmeter in a Rubbermaid cooler Arkador Equipment/Sanitation 0 04-02-2010 06:20 PM
Warped Rubbermaid Cooler Lukus Equipment/Sanitation 14 12-25-2008 05:47 PM
Looking for a 10 gallon rubbermaid cooler gxm Equipment/Sanitation 6 11-29-2008 04:47 PM
Rubbermaid Cooler film bluelou6 Equipment/Sanitation 2 01-08-2008 01:37 AM
Rubbermaid cooler question gnets99 Equipment/Sanitation 4 07-05-2007 02:16 AM



FOLLOW US ON