|
View Poll Results: Which cleaning agent kills more bacteria!
|
|
Star San
|
  
|
59 |
62.77% |
|
Iodophor
|
  
|
35 |
37.23% |
 |
|
04-16-2010, 12:34 AM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: West Hartford
Posts: 350
|
Poll, who will kill more bacteria!
|
|
For all who are interested:
In my microbiology class we were asked to bring in samples of "cleaners" from home (Lysol, bleach...). We will be placing them on plates with "lawns" of bacteria to see the effectiveness of random cleaning agents.
My plan is to bring in Star San and Iodophor... if they let me I will take pictures for everyone to see and post the results. This will be in about a week or so.
So to the vote... what will be more effective?
Star San or Iodophor?
Just a few notes on the experiment:
We will be doing a filter paper method to determine effectiveness. We soak a paper disk in the sanitizer and then add the disk to the bacterial plate. The greater the area of "clearing" the more effective the cleaning agent is against the type of bacteria. In this case is either B. subtilis or S. aureus.
Just a simple way to determine effectiveness and more interesting that scientific. As some agents may just travel father on the plate that others.
UPDATE 4/20/2010
The bacteria I was given is S. aureus... We inoculated each plate with our bacteria, then soaked a paper disc in the following.
4 plates total: 1 Star San, 1 Iodophor, 1 Phenol, and 1 is straight bleach. Results will be next week.
RESULTS 4/27/2010
There really is no winner in the end... I am going with inconclusive results because Iodophor really did nothing at all. This could be because the Iodophor evaporated off the disc, did not diffuse across the plate, or my concentration was low. Who knows, but it was fun any way. Just in case I am sticking with Star San!
Note the cleared area around each white disk showing no bacterial growth. Pictures were taken with my cell phone so are not the best.
Last edited by optimatored; 04-28-2010 at 11:06 PM.
Reason: RESULTS ARE IN
|
|
|
04-16-2010, 12:36 AM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 675
|
they both work 100% if used correctly...i vote both (I was a microbiology major and recommend changing majors unless you plan on being a doctor or teacher)
cheers 
__________________
You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline - it helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer.
----Frank Zappa
Last edited by goose1873; 04-16-2010 at 12:38 AM.
|
|
|
04-16-2010, 12:39 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: West Hartford
Posts: 350
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by goose1873
they both work 100% if used correctly...i vote both (I was a microbiology major and recommend changing majors unless you plan on being a doctor or teacher)
cheers 
|
Just need it for nursing.
|
|
|
04-16-2010, 01:06 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: East Dundee, Illinois
Posts: 4,961
|
I'm saying star-san. It claims to "go after" bacteria even when sugar or other carbohydrates are present, unlike something like bleach that is in-discriminatory.
__________________
"People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people." - V
Primary: Nothin
Secondary: Shady Lord RIS, Water to Barleywine, Pumpkin wine, burnt mead
Kegged: Crappy infected mild
Bottles: Apfelwein, 999 Barleywine, Oatmeal Stout, Robust Porter, Robust smoked porter, Simcoe Smash
|
|
|
04-16-2010, 02:02 PM
|
#5
|
|
Look under the recliner
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 2,570
|
I vote for Iodophor working better. I think the pH of the starsan may be adversely affected by the ingredients in the media, which might raise the pH above that recommended for Starsan. Both will be diluted, but I don't recall iodophor having pH issues
__________________
On Tap: Ger Pils, Pale Ale, Bitters, Session IPA
Kegged and Aging/Lagering: Imperial Alt, Belgian dark strong, Orange Kitty Zoom (std. Amer. Lager) Czech Pilsner II, CAP, Kolsch, Rye lager, CZ pils, Lite lager, Alt
Secondary:
Primary:CZ pils, OKZ
Brewing soon:,IPA
Recently kicked : ( : Porter, Saison, Belg. IPA
Pilsner Urquell Master Homebrewer (NYC 2011)
P U crowns winners in its inaugural master HB competition
|
|
|
04-16-2010, 06:08 PM
|
#6
|
|
Pissing in Post Toasties
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Shady Shores, TX
Posts: 9,515
|
Iodophor all the way.
__________________
If I have to bend over to start the job, so does she. - JohnnyO
Nothing to worry about, but really hard to get enough for a whole bowl of cereal. - bull8042
|
|
|
04-16-2010, 06:23 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,063
|
No idea but anxious to see the results.
Would be really interesting to see this over time...
1 second, 30 second, 1 minute contact, etc...
|
|
|
04-16-2010, 06:26 PM
|
#8
|
|
PKU
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Cold Part of AZ
Posts: 26,126
|
|
|
|
04-16-2010, 06:29 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kanatenah
Posts: 1,334
|
Don't really care. Both are obviously affective enough for home brewers.
|
|
|
04-16-2010, 06:40 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Norwalk, Ohio
Posts: 10,273
|
I voted "Elephant" because I am uneducated and I know a gerbil with a lisp.
Looking forward to the results. Thread duly prosted.
Edit. This thread could be even more interesting than it first appears if we get to see the data that compares these sanitizers to common household cleaners. I, for one, when disposing of my old starsan do so creatively. I put some in the dishwasher, some down the waste disposal, some in the whirlpool bath (Real bacteria traps) It would be nice to see if i'm wasting my time or not. 
__________________
Why do they never tell you they are a guy until AFTER you put your hand up their skirt?
Last edited by Laughing_Gnome_Invisible; 04-16-2010 at 06:46 PM.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|