Advertise Here
Main · BrewSpace · Recipes · Wiki · Groups · Clubs · Gallery · Reviews · Video · Blogs · Store

Storewide Sale! - Kegconnection.comMemorial Day Sale KegCoMemorial Day False Bottom Free Shipping
Go Back   Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Equipment/Sanitation



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-02-2011, 05:12 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Celticway's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lawrenceville, GA, GA
Posts: 340
Default

My addition to my problem also is I am cooling 20 gallons. Looking for a quick drop.


Celticway is offline Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2011, 05:58 PM   #12
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 313
Default

Some things to keep in mind: Just because something is really cold, it doesn't mean that it has a lot of capacity to cool.

[specific] Heat capacity, heat of fusion (energy required to melt/freeze), heat of sublimation (energy required to go from solid to gas for dry ice) and heat of vaporization (liquid to gas for liquid nitrogen) are the factors that affect how much cooling you get.

Water has a high heat capacity, and takes a fair bit of energy to change it's temperature.

What you end up with is a pound of ice provides much greater cooling capacity than a pound of dry ice or pound of liquid nitrogen.

Dry ice is great and used often because it can cool far below freezing, and when used up doesn't leave anything behind...so it's great for food. Liquid nitrogen is used when extremely low temps are required.

Since with beer, neither of those two items are needed, dry ice and liquid nitrogen don't really provide a benefit.

Now that said, if you can get dry ice for nearly free or much less than ice (figure 1/4 to 1/2 the cost per pound) then you may have an advantage in your specific situation.

As for freezing in the prechiller...if it sits stagnant you'd have a risk, but under flow you should be fine. I'd actually still have it in a water bath to get better heat transfer...as the dry ice sublimiates, you'll only have gas next to the coils otherwise with a very low heat transfer rate.
Shockerengr is offline Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2011, 06:07 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Celticway's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lawrenceville, GA, GA
Posts: 340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shockerengr
Some things to keep in mind: Just because something is really cold, it doesn't mean that it has a lot of capacity to cool.

[specific] Heat capacity, heat of fusion (energy required to melt/freeze), heat of sublimation (energy required to go from solid to gas for dry ice) and heat of vaporization (liquid to gas for liquid nitrogen) are the factors that affect how much cooling you get.

Water has a high heat capacity, and takes a fair bit of energy to change it's temperature.

What you end up with is a pound of ice provides much greater cooling capacity than a pound of dry ice or pound of liquid nitrogen.

Dry ice is great and used often because it can cool far below freezing, and when used up doesn't leave anything behind...so it's great for food. Liquid nitrogen is used when extremely low temps are required.

Since with beer, neither of those two items are needed, dry ice and liquid nitrogen don't really provide a benefit.

Now that said, if you can get dry ice for nearly free or much less than ice (figure 1/4 to 1/2 the cost per pound) then you may have an advantage in your specific situation.

As for freezing in the prechiller...if it sits stagnant you'd have a risk, but under flow you should be fine. I'd actually still have it in a water bath to get better heat transfer...as the dry ice sublimiates, you'll only have gas next to the coils otherwise with a very low heat transfer rate.
Makes sense to me. Thanks.
Celticway is offline Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2011, 06:11 PM   #14
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Celticway View Post
Makes sense to me. Thanks.
I do have to make a correction (should have double checked numbers earlier)

it takes water 334kJ/kg to melt, and it takes CO2 572kJ/kg to sublimate.
so from that standpoint, you'll get more cooling from the co2. (which is great for a fridge or cooler)

In practice tho for prechilling water, once co2 sublimates, you get no further cooling (the gas escapes) when ice melts, you have 32F water, that still has a lot of cooling capacity.
Shockerengr is offline Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2011, 08:05 PM   #15
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 237
Default

Regarding Celticway's point, if you do get ice buildup on the outside of the prechiller, it would provide thermal insulation, so the advantage of using the dry ice would diminish.
A trick that some people use in laboratory environments for cooling biological samples is to use a dry ice, alcohol bath. If you used 100% alcohol, rather than a solution of it in water then you could eliminate any ice buildup on the prechiller surface.
Sardoman is offline Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2011, 02:18 AM   #16
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 144
Default

The laws of thermoconductivity dictate that a liquid has more ability to dissipate heat than a solid or a gas. Of all liquids to be considered, pure water is the best. It has many unique molecular properties, one of which is that is has the ability to absorb more energy per mL than any other liquid. The point is stick to cold water, and it doesn't have to be borderline freezing. If you're worried about excessive water usage, recirculate the cold water from a vessel such as a HLT. Even though the water will rise in temp from starting cold temp, it will still have an amazing amount of ability to absorb heat energy.


__________________
Talisman Ale Co.
Find your inspiration...
millaj92 is offline Reply With Quote


Contact Us - Top - Privacy - All times are GMT. The time now is 03:05 AM.
Copyright © Group Builder, Inc - All Rights Reserved
Craft Beer & Brewery Forum