Kegconnection Complete Starter Kit and More Giveaway!


Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Equipment/Sanitation > Crankandstein 3 roller concept

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-12-2009, 12:05 AM   #1
kingoslo
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 194
Default Crankandstein 3 roller concept

Hello my friends,

I was looking at malt mills from Crankandstein.

I was wondering what they are saying about the 3rd roller concept is anything to invest money in. This is what they are saying:

Quote:
The third roller is smoother to reduce husk damage. The triangular configuration of the rollers forms two gap. The first fixed at .070" softens the grain interior and speeds up throughput. The adjustable second gap can then more readily open the husk and separate it from the starch. This promotes easier sparging and higher brewhouse efficiency.
Source: http://www.crankandstein.net/index.p...products_id=14

I thought this sounded like bollox, but I had to ask you experts to be sure!

Also, do you think that there is a point in getting stainless steel rollers rather than standard steel rollers?

Thank you for your time

Kind regards,
Marius
__________________

Last edited by kingoslo; 11-12-2009 at 01:36 AM.
kingoslo is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-12-2009, 02:20 PM   #2
pjj2ba
Look under the recliner
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
pjj2ba's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: State College, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,427
Liked 192 Times on 158 Posts
Likes Given: 22

Default

It is not bullocks. Because the first gap gives a light crush, it allows you to set the second gap tighter and not have the rollers bind up like the same gap setting would with just a pair of rollers. Now if you've got a motor with a large amount of torque, this would be less of an issue - or if you have gorilla arms

__________________
On Tap: Ger. Pils, OKZ (std Amer. lager), CZ Pils, Maibock,
Kegged and Aging/Lagering:CAP, CAP II, Wheat lager, Imperial Pilsner, Ger. Pils, OKZ (std Amer. lager), OKZ II (for base malt comparison), light beer - yes, light beer, Belgian IPA, IPA,
Secondary:
Primary: Pale Ale
Brewing soon: Saison
Recently kicked : ( IPA, Bock, Saison,
Pilsner Urquell Master Homebrewer
(1st NYC 2011, 2nd NYC 2012)
P U crowns winners in its inaugural master HB competition
pjj2ba is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-12-2009, 02:23 PM   #3
Brewers Hardware
Vendor
HBT_SPONSOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 455
Liked 6 Times on 5 Posts

Default

I have one and I like it. I don't have anything to comapre it too though. I do know a lot of people will mill their grain twice, the second time at a narrower setting, I think this just accomplishes that in a single pass.

I do get a very smooth consistent crush.

Brewers Hardware is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-12-2009, 02:58 PM   #4
MultumInParvo
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 791
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts

Default

I would be interested to see a direct comparison. Anyone have both a 2 roller and a three roller and be willing to make the exact same batch twice to see if there is a substantial gain?

I think I am asking too much...

I too have been curious about 3 roller mills though. Just not sure I can justify it to myself.

__________________
MultumInParvo is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-12-2009, 06:05 PM   #5
JKoravos
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chelmsford, MA
Posts: 964
Liked 18 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

The goal of milling is to separate the endosperm from the husk without damaging the husk. The 3-roller design supposedly does a better job at that. I haven't done a direct comparison, but the concept certainly makes sense.

__________________
JKoravos is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-12-2009, 06:42 PM   #6
kingoslo
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 194
Default

I have seen ppl on this forum talk about 10-15% efficiency gain. That sounds crazy. Or do think otherwise?

I'll hear you final comments and then I decide M

__________________
kingoslo is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-12-2009, 07:00 PM   #7
JKoravos
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chelmsford, MA
Posts: 964
Liked 18 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

10-15% efficiency gain going from 2-roller to 3-roller? Definitely not. It likely doesn't affect your efficiency at all.

__________________
JKoravos is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Near-New Crankandstein 3D (3 roller) Mill w/ Hopper & Stainless Rollers Pelikan For Sale 5 08-06-2009 12:59 PM
Concept for HERMS hayabusa DIY Projects 3 04-13-2009 03:44 AM
Concept for a fermenter Griffsta Equipment/Sanitation 8 03-03-2009 11:23 PM
CFC concept Matovichi DIY Projects 20 08-06-2008 12:31 PM
Crankandstein 2 or 3 roller mr x All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 7 07-06-2007 12:19 AM